Gayathiri R R, Arya Bhardwaj, R Pradeep Kumar, Bala Chakravarthy Neelapu, Kunal Pal, J Sivaraman
{"title":"人工智能在低左心室射血分数诊断中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gayathiri R R, Arya Bhardwaj, R Pradeep Kumar, Bala Chakravarthy Neelapu, Kunal Pal, J Sivaraman","doi":"10.1007/s13534-025-00479-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) is crucial for counteracting heart failure progression. While Electrocardiograms (ECG) are widely used, their standalone diagnostic accuracy is insufficient. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with ECG analysis offers a promising approach to enhance precision. A systematic review was conducted to assess AI-enabled ECG for LVSD detection. Of 394 initial studies, 19 qualified for the systematic review, with 17 incorporated into meta-analysis. Study quality was gauged using QUADAS-2. Univariate meta-analysis, Spearman correlation, and bivariate meta-analyses were performed, along with publication bias assessment. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AI-enabled ECG models were 86.9% and 84.4%, respectively. Studies with an ejection fraction (EF) threshold of 35% had the highest sensitivity, while those with 50% showed lower sensitivity and specificity. A weak positive Spearman correlation was found across all studies (ρ = 0.374, <i>p</i> = 0.066). A strong positive correlation for externally validated studies (ρ = 0.696, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and a weak negative correlation for test-only studies, indicated a threshold effect. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed diagnostic robustness for studies with a 40% EF threshold; however, it showed a lack of real-world generalizability for test-only studies. AI-enabled ECG models show strong diagnostic potential for severe LVSD but remain limited for mild cases. External validation is essential for robustness and generalizability. Future research should enhance diagnostic accuracy for mild LVSD and address publication bias to optimize AI-based tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 4","pages":"661-676"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in ECG-based diagnosis of low left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gayathiri R R, Arya Bhardwaj, R Pradeep Kumar, Bala Chakravarthy Neelapu, Kunal Pal, J Sivaraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-025-00479-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Detecting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) is crucial for counteracting heart failure progression. While Electrocardiograms (ECG) are widely used, their standalone diagnostic accuracy is insufficient. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with ECG analysis offers a promising approach to enhance precision. A systematic review was conducted to assess AI-enabled ECG for LVSD detection. Of 394 initial studies, 19 qualified for the systematic review, with 17 incorporated into meta-analysis. Study quality was gauged using QUADAS-2. Univariate meta-analysis, Spearman correlation, and bivariate meta-analyses were performed, along with publication bias assessment. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AI-enabled ECG models were 86.9% and 84.4%, respectively. Studies with an ejection fraction (EF) threshold of 35% had the highest sensitivity, while those with 50% showed lower sensitivity and specificity. A weak positive Spearman correlation was found across all studies (ρ = 0.374, <i>p</i> = 0.066). A strong positive correlation for externally validated studies (ρ = 0.696, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and a weak negative correlation for test-only studies, indicated a threshold effect. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed diagnostic robustness for studies with a 40% EF threshold; however, it showed a lack of real-world generalizability for test-only studies. AI-enabled ECG models show strong diagnostic potential for severe LVSD but remain limited for mild cases. External validation is essential for robustness and generalizability. Future research should enhance diagnostic accuracy for mild LVSD and address publication bias to optimize AI-based tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"661-676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-025-00479-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-025-00479-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
检测左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)是对抗心力衰竭进展的关键。虽然心电图(ECG)被广泛使用,但其单独诊断的准确性不足。将人工智能(AI)与ECG分析相结合提供了一种很有前途的提高精度的方法。我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估人工智能心电图对LVSD的检测效果。在394项初始研究中,19项符合系统评价,17项纳入荟萃分析。使用QUADAS-2评估研究质量。进行单因素荟萃分析、Spearman相关分析和双因素荟萃分析,并进行发表偏倚评估。人工智能心电图模型的敏感性和特异性分别为86.9%和84.4%。射血分数(EF)阈值为35%的研究灵敏度最高,而阈值为50%的研究灵敏度和特异性较低。在所有研究中均发现微弱的正Spearman相关(ρ = 0.374, p = 0.066)。外部验证的研究有很强的正相关(ρ = 0.696, p = 0.008),仅测试的研究有弱的负相关,表明存在阈值效应。分级汇总受者工作特征曲线对具有40% EF阈值的研究具有诊断稳健性;然而,它显示出对仅限测试的研究缺乏现实世界的普遍性。人工智能支持的心电图模型显示出对严重LVSD的强大诊断潜力,但对轻度病例的诊断仍然有限。外部验证对于鲁棒性和泛化性至关重要。未来的研究应提高轻度LVSD的诊断准确性,解决发表偏倚问题,优化基于人工智能的工具。
Artificial intelligence in ECG-based diagnosis of low left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Detecting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) is crucial for counteracting heart failure progression. While Electrocardiograms (ECG) are widely used, their standalone diagnostic accuracy is insufficient. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with ECG analysis offers a promising approach to enhance precision. A systematic review was conducted to assess AI-enabled ECG for LVSD detection. Of 394 initial studies, 19 qualified for the systematic review, with 17 incorporated into meta-analysis. Study quality was gauged using QUADAS-2. Univariate meta-analysis, Spearman correlation, and bivariate meta-analyses were performed, along with publication bias assessment. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AI-enabled ECG models were 86.9% and 84.4%, respectively. Studies with an ejection fraction (EF) threshold of 35% had the highest sensitivity, while those with 50% showed lower sensitivity and specificity. A weak positive Spearman correlation was found across all studies (ρ = 0.374, p = 0.066). A strong positive correlation for externally validated studies (ρ = 0.696, p = 0.008), and a weak negative correlation for test-only studies, indicated a threshold effect. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed diagnostic robustness for studies with a 40% EF threshold; however, it showed a lack of real-world generalizability for test-only studies. AI-enabled ECG models show strong diagnostic potential for severe LVSD but remain limited for mild cases. External validation is essential for robustness and generalizability. Future research should enhance diagnostic accuracy for mild LVSD and address publication bias to optimize AI-based tools.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.