[selinexor联合皮下地西他滨治疗venetoclax治疗后难治或复发的髓系恶性肿瘤的疗效]。

Q3 Medicine
R H Mi, L Wang, N Hu, C Li, L Chen, Y X Ma, X D Wei
{"title":"[selinexor联合皮下地西他滨治疗venetoclax治疗后难治或复发的髓系恶性肿瘤的疗效]。","authors":"R H Mi, L Wang, N Hu, C Li, L Chen, Y X Ma, X D Wei","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240920-00358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venetoclax (Ven) is now widely used for both acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), yet there is no consensus on salvage regimens after Ven failure. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine (DAC) in 10 patients with AML or MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB1/2) who had experienced prior Ven treatment failure. A literature review was also performed. Among the 7 patients with AML, 1 achieved complete remission (CR), 2 achieved CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 1 achieved partial remission (PR), 2 had no remission, and 1 experienced disease progression (PD). Among the 3 patients with MDS, 2 achieved marrow CR and 1 had stable disease (SD). The median duration of response among the 6 responding patients was 2 months (range, 0.5-6 months). All 10 patients experienced varying degrees of myelosuppression. Five patients had mild gastrointestinal reactions, all of which were manageable. The overall tolerability was good, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. These findings suggest that selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine offers a novel and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with myeloid malignancies who have previously failed venetoclax-based therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":"46 5","pages":"473-477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12268302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Efficacy of selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine in myeloid malignancies refractory to or relapsed after venetoclax therapy].\",\"authors\":\"R H Mi, L Wang, N Hu, C Li, L Chen, Y X Ma, X D Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240920-00358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Venetoclax (Ven) is now widely used for both acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), yet there is no consensus on salvage regimens after Ven failure. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine (DAC) in 10 patients with AML or MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB1/2) who had experienced prior Ven treatment failure. A literature review was also performed. Among the 7 patients with AML, 1 achieved complete remission (CR), 2 achieved CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 1 achieved partial remission (PR), 2 had no remission, and 1 experienced disease progression (PD). Among the 3 patients with MDS, 2 achieved marrow CR and 1 had stable disease (SD). The median duration of response among the 6 responding patients was 2 months (range, 0.5-6 months). All 10 patients experienced varying degrees of myelosuppression. Five patients had mild gastrointestinal reactions, all of which were manageable. The overall tolerability was good, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. These findings suggest that selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine offers a novel and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with myeloid malignancies who have previously failed venetoclax-based therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"473-477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12268302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240920-00358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240920-00358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Venetoclax (Ven)目前广泛用于急性髓性白血病(AML)和高风险骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS),但对于Ven失效后的挽救方案尚无共识。本研究回顾性评价了selinexor联合皮下地西他滨(DAC)治疗10例既往有Ven治疗失败的AML或MDS伴过量原细胞(MDS- eb1 /2)患者的疗效和安全性。并进行文献综述。7例AML患者中,1例达到完全缓解(CR), 2例达到CR伴不完全血液学恢复(CRi), 1例达到部分缓解(PR), 2例无缓解,1例出现疾病进展(PD)。3例MDS患者中2例达到骨髓CR, 1例病情稳定(SD)。6例有应答的患者中位应答持续时间为2个月(范围0.5-6个月)。10例患者均出现不同程度的骨髓抑制。5名患者有轻微的胃肠道反应,这些反应都是可控的。总体耐受性良好,无治疗相关死亡发生。这些研究结果表明,塞利那索联合皮下地西他滨为先前以venetoclaxs为基础的治疗失败的髓系恶性肿瘤患者提供了一种新的耐受性良好的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Efficacy of selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine in myeloid malignancies refractory to or relapsed after venetoclax therapy].

Venetoclax (Ven) is now widely used for both acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), yet there is no consensus on salvage regimens after Ven failure. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine (DAC) in 10 patients with AML or MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB1/2) who had experienced prior Ven treatment failure. A literature review was also performed. Among the 7 patients with AML, 1 achieved complete remission (CR), 2 achieved CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 1 achieved partial remission (PR), 2 had no remission, and 1 experienced disease progression (PD). Among the 3 patients with MDS, 2 achieved marrow CR and 1 had stable disease (SD). The median duration of response among the 6 responding patients was 2 months (range, 0.5-6 months). All 10 patients experienced varying degrees of myelosuppression. Five patients had mild gastrointestinal reactions, all of which were manageable. The overall tolerability was good, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. These findings suggest that selinexor combined with subcutaneous decitabine offers a novel and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with myeloid malignancies who have previously failed venetoclax-based therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信