职称的使用和性别代表在大查房和跨专业的特邀演讲。

Q2 Social Sciences
Alexandra Hernandez, Mollie C Marr, Alexandra Pincus, Karen J Brasel
{"title":"职称的使用和性别代表在大查房和跨专业的特邀演讲。","authors":"Alexandra Hernandez, Mollie C Marr, Alexandra Pincus, Karen J Brasel","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies show that women are underrepresented in grand rounds across academic specialties. When women are invited as speakers, they are less likely to be introduced by their professional title compared to men. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influenced the use of professional titles when introducing speakers at grand rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational study of grand rounds from October 2017 to March 2020 for the departments of internal medicine, neurology, OB/Gyn, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery at a large, academic medical center in the United States. Introductions were coded for the use of speakers' title, introducer and speaker gender, introducer and speaker training level, and speaker home institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 unique grand rounds and invited lectureships were reviewed for a total of 717 introductions. A greater number of men spoke at grand rounds across specialties and training (55%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 450.4, <i>P</i> < .01). Men represented a greater proportion of invited speakers (62%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 13.23, <i>P</i> < .01). Overall, men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency (49% women). Invited and endowed speakers were more likely to be introduced by their professional title (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.01; <i>P</i> = .01). Title use and representation varied by specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women remain underrepresented as grand rounds and invited speakers. Men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency. Differences between departments suggested that introduction protocols increased title use, and consideration of gender balance could be used to improve gender representation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Title Use and Gender Representation During Grand Rounds and Invited Lectureships Across Specialties.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Hernandez, Mollie C Marr, Alexandra Pincus, Karen J Brasel\",\"doi\":\"10.7812/TPP/25.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies show that women are underrepresented in grand rounds across academic specialties. When women are invited as speakers, they are less likely to be introduced by their professional title compared to men. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influenced the use of professional titles when introducing speakers at grand rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational study of grand rounds from October 2017 to March 2020 for the departments of internal medicine, neurology, OB/Gyn, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery at a large, academic medical center in the United States. Introductions were coded for the use of speakers' title, introducer and speaker gender, introducer and speaker training level, and speaker home institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 unique grand rounds and invited lectureships were reviewed for a total of 717 introductions. A greater number of men spoke at grand rounds across specialties and training (55%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 450.4, <i>P</i> < .01). Men represented a greater proportion of invited speakers (62%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 13.23, <i>P</i> < .01). Overall, men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency (49% women). Invited and endowed speakers were more likely to be introduced by their professional title (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.01; <i>P</i> = .01). Title use and representation varied by specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women remain underrepresented as grand rounds and invited speakers. Men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency. Differences between departments suggested that introduction protocols increased title use, and consideration of gender balance could be used to improve gender representation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,女性在学术专业的大查房中代表性不足。当女性被邀请作为演讲者时,与男性相比,她们不太可能被介绍自己的专业头衔。本研究的目的是确定在大型会议上介绍演讲者时影响专业头衔使用的因素。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,对2017年10月至2020年3月期间美国一家大型学术医疗中心的内科、神经内科、妇产科、儿科、精神病学和外科进行了大查房。根据演讲者的头衔、介绍人和演讲者的性别、介绍人和演讲者的培训水平以及演讲者所在的机构对介绍进行编码。结果:共有386个独特的大报告会和特邀讲师被审查,总共有717个介绍。在各专业和培训的大检查中,男性发言的人数较多(55%,χ2 = 450.4, P < 0.01)。男性在受邀演讲者中所占比例较大(62%,χ2 = 13.23, P < 0.01)。总体而言,男性和女性被介绍其专业头衔的频率相似(女性占49%)。受邀演讲者和捐赠演讲者更有可能通过他们的专业头衔被介绍(优势比,1.85;95%置信区间为1.14-3.01;P = 0.01)。职称的使用和表示因专业而异。结论:女性在圆桌会议和特邀演讲中所占的比例仍然不足。男性和女性被介绍其职业头衔的频率相似。部门之间的差异表明,引入议定书增加了职称的使用,考虑性别平衡可以用来改善性别代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professional Title Use and Gender Representation During Grand Rounds and Invited Lectureships Across Specialties.

Introduction: Studies show that women are underrepresented in grand rounds across academic specialties. When women are invited as speakers, they are less likely to be introduced by their professional title compared to men. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influenced the use of professional titles when introducing speakers at grand rounds.

Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of grand rounds from October 2017 to March 2020 for the departments of internal medicine, neurology, OB/Gyn, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery at a large, academic medical center in the United States. Introductions were coded for the use of speakers' title, introducer and speaker gender, introducer and speaker training level, and speaker home institution.

Results: A total of 386 unique grand rounds and invited lectureships were reviewed for a total of 717 introductions. A greater number of men spoke at grand rounds across specialties and training (55%, χ2 = 450.4, P < .01). Men represented a greater proportion of invited speakers (62%, χ2 = 13.23, P < .01). Overall, men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency (49% women). Invited and endowed speakers were more likely to be introduced by their professional title (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.01; P = .01). Title use and representation varied by specialty.

Conclusions: Women remain underrepresented as grand rounds and invited speakers. Men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency. Differences between departments suggested that introduction protocols increased title use, and consideration of gender balance could be used to improve gender representation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信