{"title":"I期肺癌的手术治疗——大叶与叶下切除术。","authors":"Sarah Rudasill, Farhood Farjah","doi":"10.1055/a-2649-9277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but advances in screening and early detection have improved opportunities for curative treatment. Therapeutic intent surgical resection remains a cornerstone for managing clinical stage IA disease. However, the optimal extent of surgical resection in this population has been a subject of ongoing debate. This review, guided by an introductory case-based vignette, provides a primer on the technical aspects of resection, pretreatment patient-level factors underlying decision-making, and other determinants of outcomes that may influence decisions to pursue lobar versus sublobar resection. We then offer a critique of the evidence base, focusing on the results of four randomized controlled trials: the Lung Cancer Study Group, DRKS00004897, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, and CALGB140503. Following an interpretation of the available evidence, the review highlights contemporary practice patterns and the challenges of preference-based decisions. Finally, evidence gaps are highlighted as opportunities for future study to improve patient outcomes and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":21727,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical therapy for stage I lung cancer - lobar versus sublobar resection.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Rudasill, Farhood Farjah\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2649-9277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but advances in screening and early detection have improved opportunities for curative treatment. Therapeutic intent surgical resection remains a cornerstone for managing clinical stage IA disease. However, the optimal extent of surgical resection in this population has been a subject of ongoing debate. This review, guided by an introductory case-based vignette, provides a primer on the technical aspects of resection, pretreatment patient-level factors underlying decision-making, and other determinants of outcomes that may influence decisions to pursue lobar versus sublobar resection. We then offer a critique of the evidence base, focusing on the results of four randomized controlled trials: the Lung Cancer Study Group, DRKS00004897, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, and CALGB140503. Following an interpretation of the available evidence, the review highlights contemporary practice patterns and the challenges of preference-based decisions. Finally, evidence gaps are highlighted as opportunities for future study to improve patient outcomes and experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2649-9277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2649-9277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical therapy for stage I lung cancer - lobar versus sublobar resection.
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but advances in screening and early detection have improved opportunities for curative treatment. Therapeutic intent surgical resection remains a cornerstone for managing clinical stage IA disease. However, the optimal extent of surgical resection in this population has been a subject of ongoing debate. This review, guided by an introductory case-based vignette, provides a primer on the technical aspects of resection, pretreatment patient-level factors underlying decision-making, and other determinants of outcomes that may influence decisions to pursue lobar versus sublobar resection. We then offer a critique of the evidence base, focusing on the results of four randomized controlled trials: the Lung Cancer Study Group, DRKS00004897, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, and CALGB140503. Following an interpretation of the available evidence, the review highlights contemporary practice patterns and the challenges of preference-based decisions. Finally, evidence gaps are highlighted as opportunities for future study to improve patient outcomes and experiences.
期刊介绍:
The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.