I期肺癌的手术治疗——大叶与叶下切除术。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sarah Rudasill, Farhood Farjah
{"title":"I期肺癌的手术治疗——大叶与叶下切除术。","authors":"Sarah Rudasill, Farhood Farjah","doi":"10.1055/a-2649-9277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but advances in screening and early detection have improved opportunities for curative treatment. Therapeutic intent surgical resection remains a cornerstone for managing clinical stage IA disease. However, the optimal extent of surgical resection in this population has been a subject of ongoing debate. This review, guided by an introductory case-based vignette, provides a primer on the technical aspects of resection, pretreatment patient-level factors underlying decision-making, and other determinants of outcomes that may influence decisions to pursue lobar versus sublobar resection. We then offer a critique of the evidence base, focusing on the results of four randomized controlled trials: the Lung Cancer Study Group, DRKS00004897, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, and CALGB140503. Following an interpretation of the available evidence, the review highlights contemporary practice patterns and the challenges of preference-based decisions. Finally, evidence gaps are highlighted as opportunities for future study to improve patient outcomes and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":21727,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical therapy for stage I lung cancer - lobar versus sublobar resection.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Rudasill, Farhood Farjah\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2649-9277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but advances in screening and early detection have improved opportunities for curative treatment. Therapeutic intent surgical resection remains a cornerstone for managing clinical stage IA disease. However, the optimal extent of surgical resection in this population has been a subject of ongoing debate. This review, guided by an introductory case-based vignette, provides a primer on the technical aspects of resection, pretreatment patient-level factors underlying decision-making, and other determinants of outcomes that may influence decisions to pursue lobar versus sublobar resection. We then offer a critique of the evidence base, focusing on the results of four randomized controlled trials: the Lung Cancer Study Group, DRKS00004897, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, and CALGB140503. Following an interpretation of the available evidence, the review highlights contemporary practice patterns and the challenges of preference-based decisions. Finally, evidence gaps are highlighted as opportunities for future study to improve patient outcomes and experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2649-9277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2649-9277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,但筛查和早期发现方面的进展改善了治愈性治疗的机会。治疗目的手术切除仍然是管理临床IA期疾病的基石。然而,在这一人群中手术切除的最佳范围一直是一个持续争论的主题。本综述以介绍性病例为基础,提供了切除术技术方面的基础,预处理患者层面的决策因素,以及可能影响决定进行大叶切除还是叶下切除的其他决定因素。然后,我们对证据基础进行了批评,重点关注四项随机对照试验的结果:肺癌研究组、DRKS00004897、JCOG0802/WJOG4607L和CALGB140503。在对现有证据进行解释之后,该综述强调了当代实践模式和基于偏好的决策的挑战。最后,证据差距被强调为未来研究的机会,以改善患者的结果和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical therapy for stage I lung cancer - lobar versus sublobar resection.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but advances in screening and early detection have improved opportunities for curative treatment. Therapeutic intent surgical resection remains a cornerstone for managing clinical stage IA disease. However, the optimal extent of surgical resection in this population has been a subject of ongoing debate. This review, guided by an introductory case-based vignette, provides a primer on the technical aspects of resection, pretreatment patient-level factors underlying decision-making, and other determinants of outcomes that may influence decisions to pursue lobar versus sublobar resection. We then offer a critique of the evidence base, focusing on the results of four randomized controlled trials: the Lung Cancer Study Group, DRKS00004897, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, and CALGB140503. Following an interpretation of the available evidence, the review highlights contemporary practice patterns and the challenges of preference-based decisions. Finally, evidence gaps are highlighted as opportunities for future study to improve patient outcomes and experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信