评估ImageTrend协作作为国家EMS数据集:与国家EMS信息系统的横断面比较。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alexander J Ulintz, Christopher B Gage, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Rebecca E Cash, Henry E Wang, Ashish R Panchal
{"title":"评估ImageTrend协作作为国家EMS数据集:与国家EMS信息系统的横断面比较。","authors":"Alexander J Ulintz, Christopher B Gage, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Rebecca E Cash, Henry E Wang, Ashish R Panchal","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2526160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ImageTrend Collaborate (ITC) is a new dataset of emergency medical services (EMS) patient care events. While offering a new option for prehospital research, it is unclear if ITC data accurately reflects EMS event characteristics across the United States. Our objective was to assess the national representativeness of the ITC dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the 2022 ITC with the 2022 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) research dataset, a federally funded national EMS data repository. We compared 9-1-1 EMS activations across call (e.g., agency level of service, urbanicity, census region), patient (e.g., age category, sex, dispatch complaint, response time, primary symptom, primary impression), and intervention (e.g., procedures) characteristics. We quantified absolute proportional differences (PD, ITC% - NEMSIS%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardized mean differences (SMD) to evaluate the effect size of observed differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 9,592,122 EMS events in ITC and 41,997,730 in NEMSIS. ImageTrend Collaborate included a higher proportion of fire-based agencies (PD 8.2, SMD 0.16) and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians (PD 2.1, SMD 0.12) and lower proportion of volunteer agencies (PD -1.4, SMD -0.12). Census Region differences included West (PD 13.9, SMD 0.31), Northeast (PD -11.0, SMD -0.33), and Midwest (PD -5.2, SMD -0.14). Age, sex, dispatch complaint, and primary impression had absolute proportional differences less than 1.0% with SMD less than 0.10 (i.e., negligible) except for \"sick person\" dispatch (PD -3.0, SMD -0.08) and \"other general\" primary symptom (PD -1.5, SMD -0.11). Median response times were identical in both databases. The most common procedures were similar between the datasets, but differed in proportion, including: catheterization of vein (PD -4.8, SMD -0.12), 12 lead electrocardiogram (PD -7.9, SMD -0.22), and evaluation procedure (PD -3.8, SMD -0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ImageTrend Collaborate reflects most national EMS call, patient, and intervention characteristics. Notable and expected differences between ITC and NEMSIS include fire-based agency and census region representation, likely due to self-selection; however, differences in procedures may reflect tradeoffs between granularity of a single vendor dataset versus an aggregated national dataset. Prehospital researchers should understand the characteristics of the ITC dataset to ensure proper use and analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating ImageTrend Collaborate as a National EMS Dataset: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with the National EMS Information System.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander J Ulintz, Christopher B Gage, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Rebecca E Cash, Henry E Wang, Ashish R Panchal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2526160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ImageTrend Collaborate (ITC) is a new dataset of emergency medical services (EMS) patient care events. While offering a new option for prehospital research, it is unclear if ITC data accurately reflects EMS event characteristics across the United States. Our objective was to assess the national representativeness of the ITC dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the 2022 ITC with the 2022 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) research dataset, a federally funded national EMS data repository. We compared 9-1-1 EMS activations across call (e.g., agency level of service, urbanicity, census region), patient (e.g., age category, sex, dispatch complaint, response time, primary symptom, primary impression), and intervention (e.g., procedures) characteristics. We quantified absolute proportional differences (PD, ITC% - NEMSIS%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardized mean differences (SMD) to evaluate the effect size of observed differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 9,592,122 EMS events in ITC and 41,997,730 in NEMSIS. ImageTrend Collaborate included a higher proportion of fire-based agencies (PD 8.2, SMD 0.16) and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians (PD 2.1, SMD 0.12) and lower proportion of volunteer agencies (PD -1.4, SMD -0.12). Census Region differences included West (PD 13.9, SMD 0.31), Northeast (PD -11.0, SMD -0.33), and Midwest (PD -5.2, SMD -0.14). Age, sex, dispatch complaint, and primary impression had absolute proportional differences less than 1.0% with SMD less than 0.10 (i.e., negligible) except for \\\"sick person\\\" dispatch (PD -3.0, SMD -0.08) and \\\"other general\\\" primary symptom (PD -1.5, SMD -0.11). Median response times were identical in both databases. The most common procedures were similar between the datasets, but differed in proportion, including: catheterization of vein (PD -4.8, SMD -0.12), 12 lead electrocardiogram (PD -7.9, SMD -0.22), and evaluation procedure (PD -3.8, SMD -0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ImageTrend Collaborate reflects most national EMS call, patient, and intervention characteristics. Notable and expected differences between ITC and NEMSIS include fire-based agency and census region representation, likely due to self-selection; however, differences in procedures may reflect tradeoffs between granularity of a single vendor dataset versus an aggregated national dataset. Prehospital researchers should understand the characteristics of the ITC dataset to ensure proper use and analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2526160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2526160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:imagettrend协作(ITC)是一个新的紧急医疗服务(EMS)患者护理事件数据集。虽然ITC数据为院前研究提供了一种新的选择,但尚不清楚ITC数据是否准确反映了美国各地EMS事件的特征。我们的目标是评估ITC数据集的国家代表性。方法:我们进行了一项横断面研究,将2022年ITC与2022年国家EMS信息系统(NEMSIS)研究数据集(一个联邦资助的国家EMS数据存储库)进行比较。我们比较了9-1-1 EMS在呼叫(例如,服务机构水平,城市,人口普查地区),患者(例如,年龄类别,性别,调度投诉,响应时间,主要症状,主要印象)和干预(例如,程序)特征中的激活情况。我们用95%置信区间(CI)和标准化平均差异(SMD)量化绝对比例差异(PD, ITC% - NEMSIS%),以评估观察到的差异的效应大小。结果:我们纳入了ITC的9,592,122例EMS事件和NEMSIS的41,997,730例。ImageTrend collaboration包括较高比例的消防机构(PD 8.2, SMD 0.16)和高级紧急医疗技术人员(PD 2.1, SMD 0.12),以及较低比例的志愿机构(PD -1.4, SMD -0.12)。人口普查地区差异包括西部(PD 13.9, SMD 0.31),东北部(PD -11.0, SMD -0.33)和中西部(PD -5.2, SMD -0.14)。年龄、性别、派遣主诉和最初印象的绝对比例差异小于1.0%,SMD小于0.10(即可以忽略不计),除了“病人”派遣(PD -3.0, SMD -0.08)和“其他一般”主要症状(PD -1.5, SMD -0.11)。两个数据库的中位数响应时间相同。数据集之间最常见的程序相似,但比例不同,包括:静脉置管(PD -4.8, SMD -0.12), 12导联心电图(PD -7.9, SMD -0.22)和评估程序(PD -3.8, SMD -0.15)。结论:imagettrend collaboration反映了大多数国家EMS呼叫、患者和干预的特点。ITC和NEMSIS之间值得注意和预期的差异包括基于火灾的机构和人口普查区域代表性,可能是由于自我选择;然而,过程中的差异可能反映了单个供应商数据集与聚合的国家数据集的粒度之间的权衡。院前研究人员应了解ITC数据集的特点,以确保正确使用和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating ImageTrend Collaborate as a National EMS Dataset: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with the National EMS Information System.

Objectives: ImageTrend Collaborate (ITC) is a new dataset of emergency medical services (EMS) patient care events. While offering a new option for prehospital research, it is unclear if ITC data accurately reflects EMS event characteristics across the United States. Our objective was to assess the national representativeness of the ITC dataset.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the 2022 ITC with the 2022 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) research dataset, a federally funded national EMS data repository. We compared 9-1-1 EMS activations across call (e.g., agency level of service, urbanicity, census region), patient (e.g., age category, sex, dispatch complaint, response time, primary symptom, primary impression), and intervention (e.g., procedures) characteristics. We quantified absolute proportional differences (PD, ITC% - NEMSIS%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardized mean differences (SMD) to evaluate the effect size of observed differences.

Results: We included 9,592,122 EMS events in ITC and 41,997,730 in NEMSIS. ImageTrend Collaborate included a higher proportion of fire-based agencies (PD 8.2, SMD 0.16) and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians (PD 2.1, SMD 0.12) and lower proportion of volunteer agencies (PD -1.4, SMD -0.12). Census Region differences included West (PD 13.9, SMD 0.31), Northeast (PD -11.0, SMD -0.33), and Midwest (PD -5.2, SMD -0.14). Age, sex, dispatch complaint, and primary impression had absolute proportional differences less than 1.0% with SMD less than 0.10 (i.e., negligible) except for "sick person" dispatch (PD -3.0, SMD -0.08) and "other general" primary symptom (PD -1.5, SMD -0.11). Median response times were identical in both databases. The most common procedures were similar between the datasets, but differed in proportion, including: catheterization of vein (PD -4.8, SMD -0.12), 12 lead electrocardiogram (PD -7.9, SMD -0.22), and evaluation procedure (PD -3.8, SMD -0.15).

Conclusions: ImageTrend Collaborate reflects most national EMS call, patient, and intervention characteristics. Notable and expected differences between ITC and NEMSIS include fire-based agency and census region representation, likely due to self-selection; however, differences in procedures may reflect tradeoffs between granularity of a single vendor dataset versus an aggregated national dataset. Prehospital researchers should understand the characteristics of the ITC dataset to ensure proper use and analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信