Gabrielle Dagasso, Matthias Wilms, Raissa Souza, Nils D Forkert
{"title":"在基因组分析的深度学习模型中考虑种群结构。","authors":"Gabrielle Dagasso, Matthias Wilms, Raissa Souza, Nils D Forkert","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning methods are becoming increasingly popular for genotype analyses in recent years. In conventional genomic analyses, it is important to account for confounders to avoid biasing the results. Genetic relatedness is one of the most common confounders in conventional genomic analyses and there is a general consensus that it should be considered in the analysis to prevent distant levels of common ancestry from affecting the identification of causal variants. In contrast, genetic relatedness is not considered or ignored in many of the recently published deep learning models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates whether the omission of genetic relatedness in deep learning models, common in recent literature, introduces confounding effects similar to those observed in conventional genomic analyses, particularly due to ancestry-related variants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and used a deep learning model to perform classifications based on single nucleotide polymorphism data from simulated and real-world datasets to examine whether population structure is confounding the model and potentially causing shortcut learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study suggest that population structure may not significantly affect the performance of the deep learning model. However, explainable AI revealed notable differences in the focus between the confounded and unconfounded models when examining SNP feature importance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While population structure may not heavily affect model performance, it is important to reduce the models' capabilities of shortcut learning when designing deep learning models for analyzing genomic datasets, by using ancestry-related variants over potentially relevant biomarkers of the disease or disorder in question. The code used to perform these analyses can be found at: https://github.com/notTrivial/populationStructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"104873"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for population structure in deep learning models for genomic analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Dagasso, Matthias Wilms, Raissa Souza, Nils D Forkert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning methods are becoming increasingly popular for genotype analyses in recent years. In conventional genomic analyses, it is important to account for confounders to avoid biasing the results. Genetic relatedness is one of the most common confounders in conventional genomic analyses and there is a general consensus that it should be considered in the analysis to prevent distant levels of common ancestry from affecting the identification of causal variants. In contrast, genetic relatedness is not considered or ignored in many of the recently published deep learning models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates whether the omission of genetic relatedness in deep learning models, common in recent literature, introduces confounding effects similar to those observed in conventional genomic analyses, particularly due to ancestry-related variants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and used a deep learning model to perform classifications based on single nucleotide polymorphism data from simulated and real-world datasets to examine whether population structure is confounding the model and potentially causing shortcut learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study suggest that population structure may not significantly affect the performance of the deep learning model. However, explainable AI revealed notable differences in the focus between the confounded and unconfounded models when examining SNP feature importance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While population structure may not heavily affect model performance, it is important to reduce the models' capabilities of shortcut learning when designing deep learning models for analyzing genomic datasets, by using ancestry-related variants over potentially relevant biomarkers of the disease or disorder in question. The code used to perform these analyses can be found at: https://github.com/notTrivial/populationStructure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104873\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accounting for population structure in deep learning models for genomic analysis.
Background: Deep learning methods are becoming increasingly popular for genotype analyses in recent years. In conventional genomic analyses, it is important to account for confounders to avoid biasing the results. Genetic relatedness is one of the most common confounders in conventional genomic analyses and there is a general consensus that it should be considered in the analysis to prevent distant levels of common ancestry from affecting the identification of causal variants. In contrast, genetic relatedness is not considered or ignored in many of the recently published deep learning models.
Objective: This study investigates whether the omission of genetic relatedness in deep learning models, common in recent literature, introduces confounding effects similar to those observed in conventional genomic analyses, particularly due to ancestry-related variants.
Methods: We developed and used a deep learning model to perform classifications based on single nucleotide polymorphism data from simulated and real-world datasets to examine whether population structure is confounding the model and potentially causing shortcut learning.
Results: The results of this study suggest that population structure may not significantly affect the performance of the deep learning model. However, explainable AI revealed notable differences in the focus between the confounded and unconfounded models when examining SNP feature importance.
Conclusion: While population structure may not heavily affect model performance, it is important to reduce the models' capabilities of shortcut learning when designing deep learning models for analyzing genomic datasets, by using ancestry-related variants over potentially relevant biomarkers of the disease or disorder in question. The code used to perform these analyses can be found at: https://github.com/notTrivial/populationStructure.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.