将诊断测试纳入肿瘤不可知论治疗的经济评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tamás Zelei, Gábor Kovács, Shirin Ashrafganjouei, Tamás Ágh
{"title":"将诊断测试纳入肿瘤不可知论治疗的经济评估。","authors":"Tamás Zelei, Gábor Kovács, Shirin Ashrafganjouei, Tamás Ágh","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2532023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tumor-agnostic treatments represent paradigm shift in oncology, targeting specific genetic mutations irrespective of the tumor's anatomical origin. This personalized approach relies on companion diagnostic testing to identify patients likely to respond to treatment. However, incorporating molecular diagnostics poses challenges to healthcare systems, particularly regarding costs and accessibility. This must be addressed in economic evaluations to guide health technology assessment and reimbursement decisions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This study reviewed economic evaluations of tumor-agnostic therapies, focusing on the role of diagnostic testing. A literature search identified 13 compounds targeting nine molecular alterations, with eight relevant publications analyzed. The review revealed heterogeneity in how diagnostic testing is incorporated into cost-effectiveness models. While some studies excluded the costs and consequences of diagnostic tests entirely, others included them partially or fully. Key findings underscore the substantial impact of testing, particularly for low-prevalence biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Integrating diagnostic testing into economic evaluations is essential for accurately assessing the health economic value of tumor-agnostic therapies. Economic models must account for test-treatment combinations and consider shifts in treatment pathways compared to routine practice. As the field evolves, the development of robust frameworks and clear guidance on the requirements are crucial to support sustainable and equitable healthcare decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating diagnostic testing into economic evaluations of tumour-agnostic therapies.\",\"authors\":\"Tamás Zelei, Gábor Kovács, Shirin Ashrafganjouei, Tamás Ágh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2532023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tumor-agnostic treatments represent paradigm shift in oncology, targeting specific genetic mutations irrespective of the tumor's anatomical origin. This personalized approach relies on companion diagnostic testing to identify patients likely to respond to treatment. However, incorporating molecular diagnostics poses challenges to healthcare systems, particularly regarding costs and accessibility. This must be addressed in economic evaluations to guide health technology assessment and reimbursement decisions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This study reviewed economic evaluations of tumor-agnostic therapies, focusing on the role of diagnostic testing. A literature search identified 13 compounds targeting nine molecular alterations, with eight relevant publications analyzed. The review revealed heterogeneity in how diagnostic testing is incorporated into cost-effectiveness models. While some studies excluded the costs and consequences of diagnostic tests entirely, others included them partially or fully. Key findings underscore the substantial impact of testing, particularly for low-prevalence biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Integrating diagnostic testing into economic evaluations is essential for accurately assessing the health economic value of tumor-agnostic therapies. Economic models must account for test-treatment combinations and consider shifts in treatment pathways compared to routine practice. As the field evolves, the development of robust frameworks and clear guidance on the requirements are crucial to support sustainable and equitable healthcare decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2532023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2532023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤不可知治疗代表了肿瘤学的范式转变,针对特定的基因突变,而不考虑肿瘤的解剖起源。这种个性化的方法依赖于伴随诊断测试来确定可能对治疗有反应的患者。然而,结合分子诊断给医疗保健系统带来了挑战,特别是在成本和可及性方面。必须在经济评价中解决这一问题,以指导卫生技术评估和报销决定。涵盖领域:本研究回顾了肿瘤不可知论治疗的经济评估,重点是诊断测试的作用。文献检索确定了13种化合物针对9个分子变化,并分析了8个相关出版物。该综述揭示了诊断测试如何纳入成本效益模型的异质性。虽然一些研究完全排除了诊断测试的费用和后果,但其他研究则部分或全部包括了这些费用和后果。关键发现强调了检测的重大影响,特别是对于低流行率的生物标志物。专家意见:将诊断测试纳入经济评估对于准确评估肿瘤不可知论疗法的健康经济价值至关重要。经济模型必须考虑试验-治疗组合,并考虑与常规做法相比治疗途径的转变。随着该领域的发展,制定强有力的框架和明确的要求指导对于支持可持续和公平的医疗保健决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating diagnostic testing into economic evaluations of tumour-agnostic therapies.

Introduction: Tumor-agnostic treatments represent paradigm shift in oncology, targeting specific genetic mutations irrespective of the tumor's anatomical origin. This personalized approach relies on companion diagnostic testing to identify patients likely to respond to treatment. However, incorporating molecular diagnostics poses challenges to healthcare systems, particularly regarding costs and accessibility. This must be addressed in economic evaluations to guide health technology assessment and reimbursement decisions.

Areas covered: This study reviewed economic evaluations of tumor-agnostic therapies, focusing on the role of diagnostic testing. A literature search identified 13 compounds targeting nine molecular alterations, with eight relevant publications analyzed. The review revealed heterogeneity in how diagnostic testing is incorporated into cost-effectiveness models. While some studies excluded the costs and consequences of diagnostic tests entirely, others included them partially or fully. Key findings underscore the substantial impact of testing, particularly for low-prevalence biomarkers.

Expert opinion: Integrating diagnostic testing into economic evaluations is essential for accurately assessing the health economic value of tumor-agnostic therapies. Economic models must account for test-treatment combinations and consider shifts in treatment pathways compared to routine practice. As the field evolves, the development of robust frameworks and clear guidance on the requirements are crucial to support sustainable and equitable healthcare decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信