低收入和中等收入亚洲国家癌症治疗患者经验:晚期癌症患者的横断面研究。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ellie Bostwick Andres, Louisa Poco, Ishwarya Balasubramanian, Isha Chaudry, Thushari Hapuarachchi, Sushma Bhatnagar, Anjum Khan Joad, Lubna Mariam, Rubayat Rahman, Maria Fidelis Manalo, Pham Nguyen Tuong, Gayatri Palat, Rudi Putranto, Hamzah Shatri, Wah Wah Myint Zu, Semra Ozdemir, Chetna Malhotra
{"title":"低收入和中等收入亚洲国家癌症治疗患者经验:晚期癌症患者的横断面研究。","authors":"Ellie Bostwick Andres, Louisa Poco, Ishwarya Balasubramanian, Isha Chaudry, Thushari Hapuarachchi, Sushma Bhatnagar, Anjum Khan Joad, Lubna Mariam, Rubayat Rahman, Maria Fidelis Manalo, Pham Nguyen Tuong, Gayatri Palat, Rudi Putranto, Hamzah Shatri, Wah Wah Myint Zu, Semra Ozdemir, Chetna Malhotra","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the disproportionate burden of cancer morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), little is known about patients' care experiences in these settings. This study assesses which aspects of physician communication and care coordination most influence patients' overall experience with care, and factors associated with patient experience ratings, to inform quality improvement and improve cancer care experiences in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study of 1933 patients with advanced cancer recruited at 10 major public hospitals in seven LMICs in Asia, patients rated their experience with physician communication, care coordination and overall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physician communication mattered most in patients' assessment of overall experience with care. Patient use of traditional medicine was associated with poorer physician communication ratings (β: -1.38, 95% CI: -2.11 to 0.65), while outpatient care (0.91, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.57) was associated with higher ratings. Patients who were unsure (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.10) of their cancer stage (relative to aware of late-stage), or indicated financial difficulty (sufficient money to cover their daily needs fairly well (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.50 to -0.04) or poorly (-1.20, 95% CI: -2.30 to -0.09) relative to very well) rated care coordination lower. Patient experience ratings differed by minority group status and cancer severity understanding. Respondents identifying as ethnic minorities who were unsure of their cancer stage rated physician communication significantly higher (1.64, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.58) than non-minorities aware of their advanced cancer. Non-minorities unsure of their cancer stage rated care coordination significantly lower (-1.00, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.36) than non-minority patients aware of their cancer stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new understanding of care priorities among patients with advanced cancer in LMICs. Our findings highlight the importance patients attribute to physician communication and considerations for improving patient-centred communication to support equitable and culturally appropriate care. This study also underscores the need for future work navigating prognostic discussions in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experience with cancer care in low- and middle-income Asian countries: a cross-sectional study of patients with advanced cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ellie Bostwick Andres, Louisa Poco, Ishwarya Balasubramanian, Isha Chaudry, Thushari Hapuarachchi, Sushma Bhatnagar, Anjum Khan Joad, Lubna Mariam, Rubayat Rahman, Maria Fidelis Manalo, Pham Nguyen Tuong, Gayatri Palat, Rudi Putranto, Hamzah Shatri, Wah Wah Myint Zu, Semra Ozdemir, Chetna Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the disproportionate burden of cancer morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), little is known about patients' care experiences in these settings. This study assesses which aspects of physician communication and care coordination most influence patients' overall experience with care, and factors associated with patient experience ratings, to inform quality improvement and improve cancer care experiences in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study of 1933 patients with advanced cancer recruited at 10 major public hospitals in seven LMICs in Asia, patients rated their experience with physician communication, care coordination and overall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physician communication mattered most in patients' assessment of overall experience with care. Patient use of traditional medicine was associated with poorer physician communication ratings (β: -1.38, 95% CI: -2.11 to 0.65), while outpatient care (0.91, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.57) was associated with higher ratings. Patients who were unsure (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.10) of their cancer stage (relative to aware of late-stage), or indicated financial difficulty (sufficient money to cover their daily needs fairly well (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.50 to -0.04) or poorly (-1.20, 95% CI: -2.30 to -0.09) relative to very well) rated care coordination lower. Patient experience ratings differed by minority group status and cancer severity understanding. Respondents identifying as ethnic minorities who were unsure of their cancer stage rated physician communication significantly higher (1.64, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.58) than non-minorities aware of their advanced cancer. Non-minorities unsure of their cancer stage rated care coordination significantly lower (-1.00, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.36) than non-minority patients aware of their cancer stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new understanding of care priorities among patients with advanced cancer in LMICs. Our findings highlight the importance patients attribute to physician communication and considerations for improving patient-centred communication to support equitable and culturally appropriate care. This study also underscores the need for future work navigating prognostic discussions in LMICs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232462/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017153\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管中低收入国家(LMICs)的癌症发病率和死亡率负担不成比例,但人们对这些环境中患者的护理经历知之甚少。本研究评估了医生沟通和护理协调的哪些方面最能影响患者的整体护理体验,以及与患者体验评级相关的因素,以告知质量改进和改善中低收入国家的癌症护理体验。方法:在一项横断面研究中,在亚洲7个低收入国家的10家主要公立医院招募了1933名晚期癌症患者,患者对他们在医生沟通、护理协调和整体方面的经历进行了评分。结果:医师沟通在患者对整体护理体验的评估中最重要。患者使用传统药物与较差的医生沟通评分相关(β: -1.38, 95% CI: -2.11至0.65),而门诊护理(0.91,95% CI: 0.24至1.57)与较高的评分相关。不确定(-0.77,95% CI: -1.43至-0.10)他们的癌症阶段(相对于意识到晚期),或表示经济困难(足够的钱来支付他们的日常需求相当好(-0.77,95% CI: -1.50至-0.04)或较差(-1.20,95% CI: -2.30至-0.09)相对于非常好)的患者对护理协调的评价较低。患者体验评分因少数群体状况和癌症严重程度的理解而异。不确定自己癌症分期的少数民族受访者对医生沟通的评价明显高于知道自己癌症晚期的非少数民族受访者(1.64,95% CI: 0.71至2.58)。不确定自己癌症分期的非少数患者对护理协调的评分明显低于知道自己癌症分期的非少数患者(-1.00,95% CI: -1.64至-0.36)。结论:本研究为中低收入国家晚期癌症患者的护理重点提供了新的认识。我们的研究结果强调了患者对医生沟通的重要性,以及改善以患者为中心的沟通以支持公平和文化上适当的护理的考虑。这项研究还强调了在中低收入国家开展预后讨论的未来工作的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient experience with cancer care in low- and middle-income Asian countries: a cross-sectional study of patients with advanced cancer.

Introduction: Despite the disproportionate burden of cancer morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), little is known about patients' care experiences in these settings. This study assesses which aspects of physician communication and care coordination most influence patients' overall experience with care, and factors associated with patient experience ratings, to inform quality improvement and improve cancer care experiences in LMICs.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 1933 patients with advanced cancer recruited at 10 major public hospitals in seven LMICs in Asia, patients rated their experience with physician communication, care coordination and overall.

Results: Physician communication mattered most in patients' assessment of overall experience with care. Patient use of traditional medicine was associated with poorer physician communication ratings (β: -1.38, 95% CI: -2.11 to 0.65), while outpatient care (0.91, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.57) was associated with higher ratings. Patients who were unsure (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.10) of their cancer stage (relative to aware of late-stage), or indicated financial difficulty (sufficient money to cover their daily needs fairly well (-0.77, 95% CI: -1.50 to -0.04) or poorly (-1.20, 95% CI: -2.30 to -0.09) relative to very well) rated care coordination lower. Patient experience ratings differed by minority group status and cancer severity understanding. Respondents identifying as ethnic minorities who were unsure of their cancer stage rated physician communication significantly higher (1.64, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.58) than non-minorities aware of their advanced cancer. Non-minorities unsure of their cancer stage rated care coordination significantly lower (-1.00, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.36) than non-minority patients aware of their cancer stage.

Conclusions: This study provides new understanding of care priorities among patients with advanced cancer in LMICs. Our findings highlight the importance patients attribute to physician communication and considerations for improving patient-centred communication to support equitable and culturally appropriate care. This study also underscores the need for future work navigating prognostic discussions in LMICs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信