Kristoffer Gustavsson, Andreas Fors, Cornelia van Diepen, Malin Axelsson, Monica Bertilsson, Angela Bångsbo, Gunnel Hensing, Qarin Lood
{"title":"以人为本的护理水平越高,医院和市政护理的良心压力水平越低:PCC@Work项目的横断面调查结果。","authors":"Kristoffer Gustavsson, Andreas Fors, Cornelia van Diepen, Malin Axelsson, Monica Bertilsson, Angela Bångsbo, Gunnel Hensing, Qarin Lood","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13077-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress of conscience is common in health and social care, being associated with adverse health consequences, staff turnover, and poor care quality. Person-centred care (PCC), an ethical approach to care with potential to reduce stress of conscience, has been little explored across healthcare settings. This study assesses the association between perceived PCC and stress of conscience among health and social care professionals in hospital and municipal care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web survey was sent to 11,554 health and social care professionals employed in hospital and municipal care settings in western Sweden. It yielded 2123 responses, and cross-sectional analyses were performed with data from 1671 professionals. The Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool was used to measure PCC, for both the full scale (P-CAT) and its subscales \"Extent of Personalising Care\" (EPC) and \"Organisational and Environmental Support\" (OES). The Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) was used to measure the outcome stress of conscience. Bivariate correlations and linear regressions were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bivariate correlations were significant and negative for P-CAT (r<sub>s</sub> = - 0.399, p < 0.01), EPC (r<sub>s</sub> = - 0.239, p < 0.01), and OES (r<sub>s</sub> = - 0.482, p < 0.01) with SCQ. When adjusted for covariates, multivariate linear regressions identified negative associations for P-CAT (B = - 1.16, 95% CI - 1.33, - 0.99, p < 0.001), EPC (B = - 0.8, 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.56, p < 0.001), and OES (B = - 3.14, 95% CI - 3.52, - 2.78, p < 0.001) with SCQ, indicating that as the scores of P-CAT and its subscales increase, the SCQ score decreases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings revealed that hospital and municipal health and social care professionals who perceived higher levels of PCC also perceived lower levels of stress of conscience. Considering the increased focus on PCC internationally, the results are relevant, as PCC might be one possible approach to mitigate stress of conscience. More knowledge of EPC and OES in relation to stress of conscience could be important for improved and better-targeted PCC implementation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"937"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher levels of person-centred care are associated with lower levels of stress of conscience in hospital and municipal care: cross-sectional findings from the PCC@Work project.\",\"authors\":\"Kristoffer Gustavsson, Andreas Fors, Cornelia van Diepen, Malin Axelsson, Monica Bertilsson, Angela Bångsbo, Gunnel Hensing, Qarin Lood\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13077-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress of conscience is common in health and social care, being associated with adverse health consequences, staff turnover, and poor care quality. Person-centred care (PCC), an ethical approach to care with potential to reduce stress of conscience, has been little explored across healthcare settings. This study assesses the association between perceived PCC and stress of conscience among health and social care professionals in hospital and municipal care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web survey was sent to 11,554 health and social care professionals employed in hospital and municipal care settings in western Sweden. It yielded 2123 responses, and cross-sectional analyses were performed with data from 1671 professionals. The Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool was used to measure PCC, for both the full scale (P-CAT) and its subscales \\\"Extent of Personalising Care\\\" (EPC) and \\\"Organisational and Environmental Support\\\" (OES). The Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) was used to measure the outcome stress of conscience. Bivariate correlations and linear regressions were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bivariate correlations were significant and negative for P-CAT (r<sub>s</sub> = - 0.399, p < 0.01), EPC (r<sub>s</sub> = - 0.239, p < 0.01), and OES (r<sub>s</sub> = - 0.482, p < 0.01) with SCQ. When adjusted for covariates, multivariate linear regressions identified negative associations for P-CAT (B = - 1.16, 95% CI - 1.33, - 0.99, p < 0.001), EPC (B = - 0.8, 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.56, p < 0.001), and OES (B = - 3.14, 95% CI - 3.52, - 2.78, p < 0.001) with SCQ, indicating that as the scores of P-CAT and its subscales increase, the SCQ score decreases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings revealed that hospital and municipal health and social care professionals who perceived higher levels of PCC also perceived lower levels of stress of conscience. Considering the increased focus on PCC internationally, the results are relevant, as PCC might be one possible approach to mitigate stress of conscience. More knowledge of EPC and OES in relation to stress of conscience could be important for improved and better-targeted PCC implementation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13077-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13077-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:良心压力在卫生和社会护理中很常见,与不良健康后果、工作人员离职和护理质量差有关。以人为本的护理(PCC)是一种有可能减少良心压力的伦理护理方法,在整个医疗保健环境中很少被探索。本研究评估了医院和市政护理机构中卫生和社会护理专业人员感知的PCC与良心压力之间的关系。方法:对瑞典西部医院和市政护理机构的11554名卫生和社会护理专业人员进行网络调查。它得到了2123份回复,并对来自1671名专业人士的数据进行了横断面分析。以人为本的护理评估工具用于测量PCC,包括完整量表(P-CAT)及其子量表“个性化护理程度”(EPC)和“组织和环境支持”(OES)。采用良心压力问卷(SCQ)测量良心结果压力。采用双变量相关和线性回归分析数据。结果:p - cat的双变量相关性显著且呈负相关(rs = - 0.399, p s = - 0.239, p s = - 0.482, p)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,医院和市政卫生和社会护理专业人员的PCC水平较高,良心压力水平也较低。考虑到国际上对PCC的日益关注,结果是相关的,因为PCC可能是减轻良心压力的一种可能方法。更多地了解EPC和OES与良心压力的关系,对于改进和更有针对性地实施PCC工作可能很重要。
Higher levels of person-centred care are associated with lower levels of stress of conscience in hospital and municipal care: cross-sectional findings from the PCC@Work project.
Background: Stress of conscience is common in health and social care, being associated with adverse health consequences, staff turnover, and poor care quality. Person-centred care (PCC), an ethical approach to care with potential to reduce stress of conscience, has been little explored across healthcare settings. This study assesses the association between perceived PCC and stress of conscience among health and social care professionals in hospital and municipal care settings.
Methods: A web survey was sent to 11,554 health and social care professionals employed in hospital and municipal care settings in western Sweden. It yielded 2123 responses, and cross-sectional analyses were performed with data from 1671 professionals. The Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool was used to measure PCC, for both the full scale (P-CAT) and its subscales "Extent of Personalising Care" (EPC) and "Organisational and Environmental Support" (OES). The Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) was used to measure the outcome stress of conscience. Bivariate correlations and linear regressions were used to analyse the data.
Results: The bivariate correlations were significant and negative for P-CAT (rs = - 0.399, p < 0.01), EPC (rs = - 0.239, p < 0.01), and OES (rs = - 0.482, p < 0.01) with SCQ. When adjusted for covariates, multivariate linear regressions identified negative associations for P-CAT (B = - 1.16, 95% CI - 1.33, - 0.99, p < 0.001), EPC (B = - 0.8, 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.56, p < 0.001), and OES (B = - 3.14, 95% CI - 3.52, - 2.78, p < 0.001) with SCQ, indicating that as the scores of P-CAT and its subscales increase, the SCQ score decreases.
Conclusions: Our findings revealed that hospital and municipal health and social care professionals who perceived higher levels of PCC also perceived lower levels of stress of conscience. Considering the increased focus on PCC internationally, the results are relevant, as PCC might be one possible approach to mitigate stress of conscience. More knowledge of EPC and OES in relation to stress of conscience could be important for improved and better-targeted PCC implementation efforts.
期刊介绍:
BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.