不同治疗方案治疗新诊断急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及安全性分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Di Zhang, Yongjian Li, Tingting Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Jingru Zhang
{"title":"不同治疗方案治疗新诊断急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及安全性分析。","authors":"Di Zhang, Yongjian Li, Tingting Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Jingru Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06495-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 151 newly diagnosed adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients during induction therapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University to compare the efficacy and complications of different treatment regimens in low-to-intermediate-risk (WBC < 10 × 10⁹/L) and high-risk (WBC ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L) patients. Low-to-intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups: ATRA + ATO dual induction (n = 18), ATRA + ATO + single-agent chemotherapy (n = 63), and ATRA + ATO + dual-agent chemotherapy (n = 18). High-risk patients were divided into two groups: ATRA + chemotherapy (n = 11) and ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy (n = 41). Results showed no significant differences in early mortality (0% vs. 3.17% vs. 5.56%), complete remission rates (94.44% vs. 96.83%), or molecular remission rates (94.44% vs. 100%) among low-to-intermediate-risk groups (P > 0.05). However, the dual induction group demonstrated superior relapse-free survival (100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%) and lower rates of infection (66.67%) and hepatic dysfunction (22.22%), whereas the dual-agent chemotherapy group exhibited the highest infection (100%) and liver injury rates (61.11%) (P < 0.05). In high-risk patients, the ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy group showed significantly lower relapse rates (4.88% vs. 27.27%, P = 0.025) and higher overall survival (87.80% vs. 81.81%) compared to the ATRA + chemotherapy group. Complications analysis revealed myelosuppression (78.81%) and infections (83.44%) as the most common adverse events in low-to-intermediate-risk patients, with infections reaching 95.12% in high-risk patients. The dual induction group had a higher incidence of differentiation syndrome (5.56%) but lower risks of severe bleeding and DIC. For low-to-intermediate-risk APL patients during induction therapy, ATRA + ATO dual induction reduces relapse and hepatic toxicity but requires vigilance for differentiation syndrome. High-risk patients benefit from ATRA + ATO combined with chemotherapy to improve survival. Treatment should be individualized to balance efficacy and complications, with supportive care critical for mitigating infections and bleeding. This study provides clinical evidence for optimizing APL regimens in the chemotherapy-free era.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment regimens in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Di Zhang, Yongjian Li, Tingting Liu, Xiaomin Liu, Jingru Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06495-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 151 newly diagnosed adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients during induction therapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University to compare the efficacy and complications of different treatment regimens in low-to-intermediate-risk (WBC < 10 × 10⁹/L) and high-risk (WBC ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L) patients. Low-to-intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups: ATRA + ATO dual induction (n = 18), ATRA + ATO + single-agent chemotherapy (n = 63), and ATRA + ATO + dual-agent chemotherapy (n = 18). High-risk patients were divided into two groups: ATRA + chemotherapy (n = 11) and ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy (n = 41). Results showed no significant differences in early mortality (0% vs. 3.17% vs. 5.56%), complete remission rates (94.44% vs. 96.83%), or molecular remission rates (94.44% vs. 100%) among low-to-intermediate-risk groups (P > 0.05). However, the dual induction group demonstrated superior relapse-free survival (100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%) and lower rates of infection (66.67%) and hepatic dysfunction (22.22%), whereas the dual-agent chemotherapy group exhibited the highest infection (100%) and liver injury rates (61.11%) (P < 0.05). In high-risk patients, the ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy group showed significantly lower relapse rates (4.88% vs. 27.27%, P = 0.025) and higher overall survival (87.80% vs. 81.81%) compared to the ATRA + chemotherapy group. Complications analysis revealed myelosuppression (78.81%) and infections (83.44%) as the most common adverse events in low-to-intermediate-risk patients, with infections reaching 95.12% in high-risk patients. The dual induction group had a higher incidence of differentiation syndrome (5.56%) but lower risks of severe bleeding and DIC. For low-to-intermediate-risk APL patients during induction therapy, ATRA + ATO dual induction reduces relapse and hepatic toxicity but requires vigilance for differentiation syndrome. High-risk patients benefit from ATRA + ATO combined with chemotherapy to improve survival. Treatment should be individualized to balance efficacy and complications, with supportive care critical for mitigating infections and bleeding. This study provides clinical evidence for optimizing APL regimens in the chemotherapy-free era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06495-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06495-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾性分析山东大学齐鲁医院151例初诊成人急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)患者在诱导治疗期间的临床资料,比较中低危(WBC 0.05)不同治疗方案的疗效及并发症。然而,双药诱导组表现出更高的无复发生存率(100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%),更低的感染率(66.67%)和肝功能障碍(22.22%),而双药化疗组表现出最高的感染(100%)和肝损伤率(61.11%)(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment regimens in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia.

This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 151 newly diagnosed adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients during induction therapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University to compare the efficacy and complications of different treatment regimens in low-to-intermediate-risk (WBC < 10 × 10⁹/L) and high-risk (WBC ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L) patients. Low-to-intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups: ATRA + ATO dual induction (n = 18), ATRA + ATO + single-agent chemotherapy (n = 63), and ATRA + ATO + dual-agent chemotherapy (n = 18). High-risk patients were divided into two groups: ATRA + chemotherapy (n = 11) and ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy (n = 41). Results showed no significant differences in early mortality (0% vs. 3.17% vs. 5.56%), complete remission rates (94.44% vs. 96.83%), or molecular remission rates (94.44% vs. 100%) among low-to-intermediate-risk groups (P > 0.05). However, the dual induction group demonstrated superior relapse-free survival (100% vs. 93.65% vs. 88.89%) and lower rates of infection (66.67%) and hepatic dysfunction (22.22%), whereas the dual-agent chemotherapy group exhibited the highest infection (100%) and liver injury rates (61.11%) (P < 0.05). In high-risk patients, the ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy group showed significantly lower relapse rates (4.88% vs. 27.27%, P = 0.025) and higher overall survival (87.80% vs. 81.81%) compared to the ATRA + chemotherapy group. Complications analysis revealed myelosuppression (78.81%) and infections (83.44%) as the most common adverse events in low-to-intermediate-risk patients, with infections reaching 95.12% in high-risk patients. The dual induction group had a higher incidence of differentiation syndrome (5.56%) but lower risks of severe bleeding and DIC. For low-to-intermediate-risk APL patients during induction therapy, ATRA + ATO dual induction reduces relapse and hepatic toxicity but requires vigilance for differentiation syndrome. High-risk patients benefit from ATRA + ATO combined with chemotherapy to improve survival. Treatment should be individualized to balance efficacy and complications, with supportive care critical for mitigating infections and bleeding. This study provides clinical evidence for optimizing APL regimens in the chemotherapy-free era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信