量化人为对CO₂和CH₄排放的影响:东非的统计见解和热点探测。

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Abraham Okrah, Genesis Magara, Caleb Mensah, Emmanuel Yeboah, Nana Agyemang Prempeh, Ignatius Senyo Yao Yawlui, Mathews Nyasulu, Vincent Antwi Asante, Innocent John Junior, Isaac Sarfo
{"title":"量化人为对CO₂和CH₄排放的影响:东非的统计见解和热点探测。","authors":"Abraham Okrah, Genesis Magara, Caleb Mensah, Emmanuel Yeboah, Nana Agyemang Prempeh, Ignatius Senyo Yao Yawlui, Mathews Nyasulu, Vincent Antwi Asante, Innocent John Junior, Isaac Sarfo","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14361-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>East Africa (EA) faces significant challenges related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄), largely driven by biomass burning (BB) from agricultural fires and wildfires. Despite their importance, the spatiotemporal variability of these emissions remains poorly understood. This study quantifies CO₂ and CH₄ emissions across EA (2001-2022), revealing significant CO₂ emission peaks in 2005 (32.5 million tonnes), 2016 (29.8 million tonnes), and 2020 (31.2 million tonnes), alongside an 18% increase in CH₄ emissions between 2015 and 2020. BB accounted for approximately 54% of total CO₂ emissions (~17 million tonnes) and 74% of CH₄ emissions (~16 million tonnes), with regional hotspots including Northern Uganda (NUG), Tanzania (TZ), and South Sudan (SS) exhibiting the highest intensities, especially during dry seasons where emissions surged by up to 40%. Analysis of regional trends reveals a significant decline in CO₂ emissions in the Western Transition (WTZ) (slope = -13.02, p = 0.0004), likely reflecting effective mitigation such as forest restoration and REDD+ programs, supported by satellite-observed greening. In contrast, SS, NUG, and the Southeastern Tanzania (SETZ) showed negative but statistically insignificant CO₂ trends, indicative of fluctuating land-use pressures rather than sustained mitigation. CH₄ emissions rose significantly in the WTZ (slope = 15.67, p = 0.0001), driven by agricultural intensification, with a marginal increase in NUG, while remaining stable in SS and the SETZ. Non-stationarity in emissions (ADF p > 0.05) across regions highlights the influence of dynamic socio-environmental factors such as land-use changes, policy shifts, and climate variability. These findings emphasize the urgent need for improved fire management, sustainable land practices, and integrated mitigation strategies to address EA's growing environmental threats and contribute to global climate goals under the Paris Agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 8","pages":"876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying anthropogenic impacts on CO₂ and CH₄ emissions: statistical insights and hotspot detection in East Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Okrah, Genesis Magara, Caleb Mensah, Emmanuel Yeboah, Nana Agyemang Prempeh, Ignatius Senyo Yao Yawlui, Mathews Nyasulu, Vincent Antwi Asante, Innocent John Junior, Isaac Sarfo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-025-14361-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>East Africa (EA) faces significant challenges related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄), largely driven by biomass burning (BB) from agricultural fires and wildfires. Despite their importance, the spatiotemporal variability of these emissions remains poorly understood. This study quantifies CO₂ and CH₄ emissions across EA (2001-2022), revealing significant CO₂ emission peaks in 2005 (32.5 million tonnes), 2016 (29.8 million tonnes), and 2020 (31.2 million tonnes), alongside an 18% increase in CH₄ emissions between 2015 and 2020. BB accounted for approximately 54% of total CO₂ emissions (~17 million tonnes) and 74% of CH₄ emissions (~16 million tonnes), with regional hotspots including Northern Uganda (NUG), Tanzania (TZ), and South Sudan (SS) exhibiting the highest intensities, especially during dry seasons where emissions surged by up to 40%. Analysis of regional trends reveals a significant decline in CO₂ emissions in the Western Transition (WTZ) (slope = -13.02, p = 0.0004), likely reflecting effective mitigation such as forest restoration and REDD+ programs, supported by satellite-observed greening. In contrast, SS, NUG, and the Southeastern Tanzania (SETZ) showed negative but statistically insignificant CO₂ trends, indicative of fluctuating land-use pressures rather than sustained mitigation. CH₄ emissions rose significantly in the WTZ (slope = 15.67, p = 0.0001), driven by agricultural intensification, with a marginal increase in NUG, while remaining stable in SS and the SETZ. Non-stationarity in emissions (ADF p > 0.05) across regions highlights the influence of dynamic socio-environmental factors such as land-use changes, policy shifts, and climate variability. These findings emphasize the urgent need for improved fire management, sustainable land practices, and integrated mitigation strategies to address EA's growing environmental threats and contribute to global climate goals under the Paris Agreement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 8\",\"pages\":\"876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14361-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14361-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东非(EA)面临着与温室气体(GHG)排放有关的重大挑战,特别是二氧化碳(CO 2)和甲烷(CH₄),主要由农业火灾和野火引起的生物质燃烧(BB)驱动。尽管它们很重要,但对这些排放的时空变异性仍知之甚少。该研究量化了整个EA(2001-2022)的CO₂和CH₄排放量,揭示了2005年(3250万吨),2016年(2980万吨)和2020年(3120万吨)的CO₂排放量显著达到峰值,同时2015年至2020年期间CH₄排放量增加了18%。BB约占二氧化碳排放总量的54%(约1700万吨)和氯化氢排放总量的74%(约1600万吨),其中包括北乌干达(NUG)、坦桑尼亚(TZ)和南苏丹(SS)在内的区域热点地区表现出最高的强度,特别是在旱季,排放量飙升高达40%。对区域趋势的分析显示,西部转型(WTZ)的CO 2排放量显著下降(斜率= -13.02,p = 0.0004),这可能反映了有效的缓解措施,如森林恢复和REDD+计划,并得到卫星观测绿化的支持。相比之下,SS、NUG和坦桑尼亚东南部(SETZ)呈现负的但统计上不显著的CO₂趋势,表明土地利用压力波动,而不是持续的缓解。在农业集约化的推动下,WTZ的CH₄排放量显著增加(斜率= 15.67,p = 0.0001), NUG略有增加,而SS和SETZ则保持稳定。各区域排放的非平稳性(ADF p < 0.05)突出了动态社会环境因素(如土地利用变化、政策转变和气候变率)的影响。这些调查结果强调,迫切需要改善火灾管理、可持续土地做法和综合缓解战略,以应对东亚地区日益严重的环境威胁,并为《巴黎协定》下的全球气候目标作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying anthropogenic impacts on CO₂ and CH₄ emissions: statistical insights and hotspot detection in East Africa.

East Africa (EA) faces significant challenges related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄), largely driven by biomass burning (BB) from agricultural fires and wildfires. Despite their importance, the spatiotemporal variability of these emissions remains poorly understood. This study quantifies CO₂ and CH₄ emissions across EA (2001-2022), revealing significant CO₂ emission peaks in 2005 (32.5 million tonnes), 2016 (29.8 million tonnes), and 2020 (31.2 million tonnes), alongside an 18% increase in CH₄ emissions between 2015 and 2020. BB accounted for approximately 54% of total CO₂ emissions (~17 million tonnes) and 74% of CH₄ emissions (~16 million tonnes), with regional hotspots including Northern Uganda (NUG), Tanzania (TZ), and South Sudan (SS) exhibiting the highest intensities, especially during dry seasons where emissions surged by up to 40%. Analysis of regional trends reveals a significant decline in CO₂ emissions in the Western Transition (WTZ) (slope = -13.02, p = 0.0004), likely reflecting effective mitigation such as forest restoration and REDD+ programs, supported by satellite-observed greening. In contrast, SS, NUG, and the Southeastern Tanzania (SETZ) showed negative but statistically insignificant CO₂ trends, indicative of fluctuating land-use pressures rather than sustained mitigation. CH₄ emissions rose significantly in the WTZ (slope = 15.67, p = 0.0001), driven by agricultural intensification, with a marginal increase in NUG, while remaining stable in SS and the SETZ. Non-stationarity in emissions (ADF p > 0.05) across regions highlights the influence of dynamic socio-environmental factors such as land-use changes, policy shifts, and climate variability. These findings emphasize the urgent need for improved fire management, sustainable land practices, and integrated mitigation strategies to address EA's growing environmental threats and contribute to global climate goals under the Paris Agreement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信