Carolina Säll, Upendra Argikar, Constanze Hilgendorf, Hilmar Schiller, Anders Sonesson, Kenichi Umehara, Kai Wang
{"title":"治疗性多肽药物开发过程中药物相互作用研究的临床意义:对2021 - 2024年批准的治疗性多肽的随访研究","authors":"Carolina Säll, Upendra Argikar, Constanze Hilgendorf, Hilmar Schiller, Anders Sonesson, Kenichi Umehara, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1111/cts.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The risk of clinically relevant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) for therapeutic peptides remains unclear, mandating a comprehensive analysis for this modality. In our prior study, we analyzed DDIs for 31 peptide drugs approved between January 2008 and August 2021. Here, we analyze DDI data for an additional nine peptide drugs (trofinetide, nirmatrelvir, danicopan, odevixibat, rezafungin, motixafortide, zilucoplan, vosoritide, and tirzepatide) approved from September 2021 to September 2024, focusing on in vitro and clinical DDI data for metabolism- and transporter-based interactions. All nine peptides investigated CYP inhibition in human liver microsomes (HLMs), with low risk identified for larger peptides (> 2 kDa). Likewise, all nine peptides assessed CYP induction in human hepatocytes, with one peptide showing a risk in vitro (danicopan). Phenotyping investigations varied from standard studies (e.g., HLMs with selective CYP inhibitors) to submission packages without classical phenotyping studies. All nine peptides included information related to in vitro transporter properties, but the level of detail varied between submitted packages. Clinical studies investigating metabolism- or transporter-mediated DDIs were performed for four peptides (all < 2 kDa). Area under the curve changes attributed to the peptide drug were < 2.3 fold. Our expanded dataset now includes 40 therapeutic peptides approved since 2008, providing a unique resource for drug developers. The findings reinforce our previous conclusions regarding the low likelihood of DDIs for larger peptides and a higher risk for smaller peptides with xenobiotic structural properties. This collective data will be invaluable in developing clear and meaningful DDI guidelines for therapeutic peptides.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Significance of Drug–Drug Interaction Studies During Therapeutic Peptide Drug Development: Follow-Up Investigation of Therapeutic Peptides Approved Between 2021 and 2024\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Säll, Upendra Argikar, Constanze Hilgendorf, Hilmar Schiller, Anders Sonesson, Kenichi Umehara, Kai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The risk of clinically relevant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) for therapeutic peptides remains unclear, mandating a comprehensive analysis for this modality. In our prior study, we analyzed DDIs for 31 peptide drugs approved between January 2008 and August 2021. Here, we analyze DDI data for an additional nine peptide drugs (trofinetide, nirmatrelvir, danicopan, odevixibat, rezafungin, motixafortide, zilucoplan, vosoritide, and tirzepatide) approved from September 2021 to September 2024, focusing on in vitro and clinical DDI data for metabolism- and transporter-based interactions. All nine peptides investigated CYP inhibition in human liver microsomes (HLMs), with low risk identified for larger peptides (> 2 kDa). Likewise, all nine peptides assessed CYP induction in human hepatocytes, with one peptide showing a risk in vitro (danicopan). Phenotyping investigations varied from standard studies (e.g., HLMs with selective CYP inhibitors) to submission packages without classical phenotyping studies. All nine peptides included information related to in vitro transporter properties, but the level of detail varied between submitted packages. Clinical studies investigating metabolism- or transporter-mediated DDIs were performed for four peptides (all < 2 kDa). Area under the curve changes attributed to the peptide drug were < 2.3 fold. Our expanded dataset now includes 40 therapeutic peptides approved since 2008, providing a unique resource for drug developers. The findings reinforce our previous conclusions regarding the low likelihood of DDIs for larger peptides and a higher risk for smaller peptides with xenobiotic structural properties. This collective data will be invaluable in developing clear and meaningful DDI guidelines for therapeutic peptides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70288\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70288\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Significance of Drug–Drug Interaction Studies During Therapeutic Peptide Drug Development: Follow-Up Investigation of Therapeutic Peptides Approved Between 2021 and 2024
The risk of clinically relevant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) for therapeutic peptides remains unclear, mandating a comprehensive analysis for this modality. In our prior study, we analyzed DDIs for 31 peptide drugs approved between January 2008 and August 2021. Here, we analyze DDI data for an additional nine peptide drugs (trofinetide, nirmatrelvir, danicopan, odevixibat, rezafungin, motixafortide, zilucoplan, vosoritide, and tirzepatide) approved from September 2021 to September 2024, focusing on in vitro and clinical DDI data for metabolism- and transporter-based interactions. All nine peptides investigated CYP inhibition in human liver microsomes (HLMs), with low risk identified for larger peptides (> 2 kDa). Likewise, all nine peptides assessed CYP induction in human hepatocytes, with one peptide showing a risk in vitro (danicopan). Phenotyping investigations varied from standard studies (e.g., HLMs with selective CYP inhibitors) to submission packages without classical phenotyping studies. All nine peptides included information related to in vitro transporter properties, but the level of detail varied between submitted packages. Clinical studies investigating metabolism- or transporter-mediated DDIs were performed for four peptides (all < 2 kDa). Area under the curve changes attributed to the peptide drug were < 2.3 fold. Our expanded dataset now includes 40 therapeutic peptides approved since 2008, providing a unique resource for drug developers. The findings reinforce our previous conclusions regarding the low likelihood of DDIs for larger peptides and a higher risk for smaller peptides with xenobiotic structural properties. This collective data will be invaluable in developing clear and meaningful DDI guidelines for therapeutic peptides.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.