研究呼吸呼吸对乳腺癌妇女影响的随机对照试验的范围综述

Q3 Medicine
Vinitha Ganesan, Kathryn A. Kaiser, Anjani Allada, Alekhya Puppala, David K. White, Mia Mugavero, Akhila Maruvada, Jade Kyle, Harshitha Gutta, Nusrat Jahan, Keerthi Gogineni, Megan Bell, Ritu Aneja
{"title":"研究呼吸呼吸对乳腺癌妇女影响的随机对照试验的范围综述","authors":"Vinitha Ganesan,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Kaiser,&nbsp;Anjani Allada,&nbsp;Alekhya Puppala,&nbsp;David K. White,&nbsp;Mia Mugavero,&nbsp;Akhila Maruvada,&nbsp;Jade Kyle,&nbsp;Harshitha Gutta,&nbsp;Nusrat Jahan,&nbsp;Keerthi Gogineni,&nbsp;Megan Bell,&nbsp;Ritu Aneja","doi":"10.1002/lim2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with breast cancer experience distress, treatment-related discomfort, and fear of recurrence from initial diagnosis through survivorship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the effects of breathwork interventions on the mental health and quality of life of breast cancer patients and survivors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials involving breathwork interventions in patients with breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 5909 items screened, 16 studies involving 1726 participants met the inclusion criteria. Breathing interventions included yoga (<i>n</i> = 9), qigong (<i>n</i> = 4), and other breathing techniques (<i>n</i> = 3). We found that the highest average risk of bias was in the randomization process, with challenges in accurately evaluating deviations from intended interventions due to unquantified adherence to at-home practices, although overall bias in the included studies was generally low. Interventions were prescribed daily or weekly, lasting from 1 week to 2 years. Outcomes included treatment side effects, fatigue, sleep, quality of life, biomarkers (e.g., inflammatory markers), psychosocial factors, anxiety, and depression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although positive outcomes were reported in domains of quality of life and emotional well-being, null findings were reported for vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes for breathing interventions. The wide range of interventions and outcomes administered to patients in various phases of the breast cancer care continuum complicates firm conclusions. Recruitment and adherence issues were noted in multiple studies. Future research should use more objective outcome measures, increase accessibility of the intervention (e.g., via telehealth) to improve adherence, and include longer follow-up periods to evaluate survival and recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":74076,"journal":{"name":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating Effects of Breathwork in Women With Breast Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Vinitha Ganesan,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Kaiser,&nbsp;Anjani Allada,&nbsp;Alekhya Puppala,&nbsp;David K. White,&nbsp;Mia Mugavero,&nbsp;Akhila Maruvada,&nbsp;Jade Kyle,&nbsp;Harshitha Gutta,&nbsp;Nusrat Jahan,&nbsp;Keerthi Gogineni,&nbsp;Megan Bell,&nbsp;Ritu Aneja\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lim2.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with breast cancer experience distress, treatment-related discomfort, and fear of recurrence from initial diagnosis through survivorship.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess the effects of breathwork interventions on the mental health and quality of life of breast cancer patients and survivors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials involving breathwork interventions in patients with breast cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 5909 items screened, 16 studies involving 1726 participants met the inclusion criteria. Breathing interventions included yoga (<i>n</i> = 9), qigong (<i>n</i> = 4), and other breathing techniques (<i>n</i> = 3). We found that the highest average risk of bias was in the randomization process, with challenges in accurately evaluating deviations from intended interventions due to unquantified adherence to at-home practices, although overall bias in the included studies was generally low. Interventions were prescribed daily or weekly, lasting from 1 week to 2 years. Outcomes included treatment side effects, fatigue, sleep, quality of life, biomarkers (e.g., inflammatory markers), psychosocial factors, anxiety, and depression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although positive outcomes were reported in domains of quality of life and emotional well-being, null findings were reported for vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes for breathing interventions. The wide range of interventions and outcomes administered to patients in various phases of the breast cancer care continuum complicates firm conclusions. Recruitment and adherence issues were noted in multiple studies. Future research should use more objective outcome measures, increase accessibility of the intervention (e.g., via telehealth) to improve adherence, and include longer follow-up periods to evaluate survival and recurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.70033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.70033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.70033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌患者从最初的诊断到生存期间都经历着痛苦、治疗相关的不适和对复发的恐惧。目的本研究旨在评估呼气干预对乳腺癌患者和幸存者心理健康和生活质量的影响。方法我们检索了多个数据库中涉及呼吸法干预乳腺癌患者的随机对照试验。结果在筛选的5909项研究中,有16项研究涉及1726名受试者符合纳入标准。呼吸干预包括瑜伽(n = 9)、气功(n = 4)和其他呼吸技巧(n = 3)。我们发现,平均偏倚风险最高的是随机化过程,尽管纳入研究的总体偏倚总体较低,但由于未量化的家庭实践依从性,在准确评估偏离预期干预措施方面存在挑战。干预措施每天或每周进行,持续1周到2年。结果包括治疗副作用、疲劳、睡眠、生活质量、生物标志物(如炎症标志物)、社会心理因素、焦虑和抑郁。结论:尽管在生活质量和情绪健康方面报告了积极的结果,但呼吸干预对血管舒缩症状(如潮热)的影响为零。在乳腺癌护理连续体的不同阶段对患者进行的广泛干预和结果使确切的结论复杂化。在多项研究中注意到招募和依从性问题。未来的研究应使用更客观的结果测量,增加干预的可及性(例如,通过远程医疗)以提高依从性,并包括更长的随访期以评估生存和复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Scoping Review on Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating Effects of Breathwork in Women With Breast Cancer

A Scoping Review on Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating Effects of Breathwork in Women With Breast Cancer

Background

Patients with breast cancer experience distress, treatment-related discomfort, and fear of recurrence from initial diagnosis through survivorship.

Aims

This study aimed to assess the effects of breathwork interventions on the mental health and quality of life of breast cancer patients and survivors.

Methods

We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials involving breathwork interventions in patients with breast cancer.

Results

Of the 5909 items screened, 16 studies involving 1726 participants met the inclusion criteria. Breathing interventions included yoga (n = 9), qigong (n = 4), and other breathing techniques (n = 3). We found that the highest average risk of bias was in the randomization process, with challenges in accurately evaluating deviations from intended interventions due to unquantified adherence to at-home practices, although overall bias in the included studies was generally low. Interventions were prescribed daily or weekly, lasting from 1 week to 2 years. Outcomes included treatment side effects, fatigue, sleep, quality of life, biomarkers (e.g., inflammatory markers), psychosocial factors, anxiety, and depression.

Conclusions

Although positive outcomes were reported in domains of quality of life and emotional well-being, null findings were reported for vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes for breathing interventions. The wide range of interventions and outcomes administered to patients in various phases of the breast cancer care continuum complicates firm conclusions. Recruitment and adherence issues were noted in multiple studies. Future research should use more objective outcome measures, increase accessibility of the intervention (e.g., via telehealth) to improve adherence, and include longer follow-up periods to evaluate survival and recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信