Ji-Peng Yang, Xu-Miao Li, Zhuo-Lin Liang, Rong-Sai Wei, Jing-Ying Liu
{"title":"老年人社区卫生保健服务满意度量表开发与心理测量学评价","authors":"Ji-Peng Yang, Xu-Miao Li, Zhuo-Lin Liang, Rong-Sai Wei, Jing-Ying Liu","doi":"10.1111/jep.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Community home-based elderly healthcare services play a crucial role in combating the aging trend. However, China's community home-based elderly healthcare is still in its infancy, and the quality of these services must be enhanced. The satisfaction of older adults as a significant indicator of older adults healthcare services quality is crucial for promoting the enhancement of service quality. Currently, an appropriate instrument to assess community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction is limited. The present study aimed to develop and examine the community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction scale (CHEHSSS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Developing and assessing the scale was carried out in two phases: Phase I involved a literature review and Delphi to explore the themes of satisfaction for community home-based elderly healthcare services and instrument development; Phase II established construct validity of the scale using a sample of 439 elderly in Tianjin. Data from the questionnaire were analysed using Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency. Analysis results were used to determine the reliability and validity of the developed scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The scale was developed and validated in two phases. Phase I involved a literature review and Delphi expert consultation (<i>n</i> = 15) to identify satisfaction domains and generate items. Phase II evaluated psychometric properties using a cross-sectional sample of 439 older adults in Tianjin, China. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability tests (Cronbach's <i>α</i>, split-half reliability) were conducted. The results showed seven factors including diagnosis and treatment capacity, professional skills, preventive care, care and respect, transitional care, medical circumstances, and service attitude were generated by exploratory factor analysis, and these factors explained 78.463% of the total variance. Cronbach's <i>α</i> of the community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction scale was 0.896.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The establishment of the tool will help to accurately assess the satisfaction of older adults with community home-based healthcare services, which can inform the construction of policies aimed at promoting the quality improvement of community home-based elderly healthcare services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Based Healthcare Services Satisfaction Scale Among Older Adults Development and Psychometric Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Peng Yang, Xu-Miao Li, Zhuo-Lin Liang, Rong-Sai Wei, Jing-Ying Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Community home-based elderly healthcare services play a crucial role in combating the aging trend. However, China's community home-based elderly healthcare is still in its infancy, and the quality of these services must be enhanced. The satisfaction of older adults as a significant indicator of older adults healthcare services quality is crucial for promoting the enhancement of service quality. Currently, an appropriate instrument to assess community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction is limited. The present study aimed to develop and examine the community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction scale (CHEHSSS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Developing and assessing the scale was carried out in two phases: Phase I involved a literature review and Delphi to explore the themes of satisfaction for community home-based elderly healthcare services and instrument development; Phase II established construct validity of the scale using a sample of 439 elderly in Tianjin. Data from the questionnaire were analysed using Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency. Analysis results were used to determine the reliability and validity of the developed scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The scale was developed and validated in two phases. Phase I involved a literature review and Delphi expert consultation (<i>n</i> = 15) to identify satisfaction domains and generate items. Phase II evaluated psychometric properties using a cross-sectional sample of 439 older adults in Tianjin, China. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability tests (Cronbach's <i>α</i>, split-half reliability) were conducted. The results showed seven factors including diagnosis and treatment capacity, professional skills, preventive care, care and respect, transitional care, medical circumstances, and service attitude were generated by exploratory factor analysis, and these factors explained 78.463% of the total variance. Cronbach's <i>α</i> of the community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction scale was 0.896.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The establishment of the tool will help to accurately assess the satisfaction of older adults with community home-based healthcare services, which can inform the construction of policies aimed at promoting the quality improvement of community home-based elderly healthcare services.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Community Based Healthcare Services Satisfaction Scale Among Older Adults Development and Psychometric Evaluation
Background
Community home-based elderly healthcare services play a crucial role in combating the aging trend. However, China's community home-based elderly healthcare is still in its infancy, and the quality of these services must be enhanced. The satisfaction of older adults as a significant indicator of older adults healthcare services quality is crucial for promoting the enhancement of service quality. Currently, an appropriate instrument to assess community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction is limited. The present study aimed to develop and examine the community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction scale (CHEHSSS).
Methods
Developing and assessing the scale was carried out in two phases: Phase I involved a literature review and Delphi to explore the themes of satisfaction for community home-based elderly healthcare services and instrument development; Phase II established construct validity of the scale using a sample of 439 elderly in Tianjin. Data from the questionnaire were analysed using Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency. Analysis results were used to determine the reliability and validity of the developed scale.
Results
The scale was developed and validated in two phases. Phase I involved a literature review and Delphi expert consultation (n = 15) to identify satisfaction domains and generate items. Phase II evaluated psychometric properties using a cross-sectional sample of 439 older adults in Tianjin, China. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability tests (Cronbach's α, split-half reliability) were conducted. The results showed seven factors including diagnosis and treatment capacity, professional skills, preventive care, care and respect, transitional care, medical circumstances, and service attitude were generated by exploratory factor analysis, and these factors explained 78.463% of the total variance. Cronbach's α of the community home-based elderly healthcare services satisfaction scale was 0.896.
Conclusions
The establishment of the tool will help to accurately assess the satisfaction of older adults with community home-based healthcare services, which can inform the construction of policies aimed at promoting the quality improvement of community home-based elderly healthcare services.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
