期货市场中的投资者情绪、错误定价和有限套利

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Doojin Ryu, Doowon Ryu, Heejin Yang
{"title":"期货市场中的投资者情绪、错误定价和有限套利","authors":"Doojin Ryu,&nbsp;Doowon Ryu,&nbsp;Heejin Yang","doi":"10.1002/fut.22594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We examine how investor sentiment influences KOSPI 200 futures mispricing under varying market conditions, including volatility, short-sale restrictions, and regulatory changes. The sentiment–mispricing relationship intensifies during high volatility, as arbitrageurs face greater constraints in correcting price distortions, leading to increased mispricing. Short-sale restrictions further amplify mispricing and the impact of pessimistic sentiment. Regulatory reforms reducing domestic trading activity also shape sentiment–mispricing dynamics, suggesting that lower participation by irrational investors enhances market efficiency. Our findings underscore the importance of market-specific factors—arbitrage constraints and regulations—in understanding sentiment-driven mispricing.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Markets","volume":"45 8","pages":"879-895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor Sentiment, Mispricing, and Limited Arbitrage in the Futures Market\",\"authors\":\"Doojin Ryu,&nbsp;Doowon Ryu,&nbsp;Heejin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fut.22594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We examine how investor sentiment influences KOSPI 200 futures mispricing under varying market conditions, including volatility, short-sale restrictions, and regulatory changes. The sentiment–mispricing relationship intensifies during high volatility, as arbitrageurs face greater constraints in correcting price distortions, leading to increased mispricing. Short-sale restrictions further amplify mispricing and the impact of pessimistic sentiment. Regulatory reforms reducing domestic trading activity also shape sentiment–mispricing dynamics, suggesting that lower participation by irrational investors enhances market efficiency. Our findings underscore the importance of market-specific factors—arbitrage constraints and regulations—in understanding sentiment-driven mispricing.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Futures Markets\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"879-895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Futures Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.22594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.22594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了投资者情绪如何影响KOSPI 200期货在不同市场条件下的错误定价,包括波动性、卖空限制和监管变化。情绪与错误定价的关系在高波动期间会加剧,因为套利者在纠正价格扭曲方面面临更大的限制,从而导致错误定价增加。卖空限制进一步放大了错误定价和悲观情绪的影响。减少国内交易活动的监管改革也塑造了情绪错误定价的动态,这表明非理性投资者参与度的降低提高了市场效率。我们的研究结果强调了市场特定因素——套利约束和监管——在理解情绪驱动的错误定价方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investor Sentiment, Mispricing, and Limited Arbitrage in the Futures Market

We examine how investor sentiment influences KOSPI 200 futures mispricing under varying market conditions, including volatility, short-sale restrictions, and regulatory changes. The sentiment–mispricing relationship intensifies during high volatility, as arbitrageurs face greater constraints in correcting price distortions, leading to increased mispricing. Short-sale restrictions further amplify mispricing and the impact of pessimistic sentiment. Regulatory reforms reducing domestic trading activity also shape sentiment–mispricing dynamics, suggesting that lower participation by irrational investors enhances market efficiency. Our findings underscore the importance of market-specific factors—arbitrage constraints and regulations—in understanding sentiment-driven mispricing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Markets
Journal of Futures Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Markets chronicles the latest developments in financial futures and derivatives. It publishes timely, innovative articles written by leading finance academics and professionals. Coverage ranges from the highly practical to theoretical topics that include futures, derivatives, risk management and control, financial engineering, new financial instruments, hedging strategies, analysis of trading systems, legal, accounting, and regulatory issues, and portfolio optimization. This publication contains the very latest research from the top experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信