Vincenzo De Martino, Gilberto Recupito, Giammaria Giordano, Filomena Ferrucci, Dario Di Nucci, Fabio Palomba
{"title":"进入机器学习领域:机器学习项目的改进分类和表征","authors":"Vincenzo De Martino, Gilberto Recupito, Giammaria Giordano, Filomena Ferrucci, Dario Di Nucci, Fabio Palomba","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prominence of Machine Learning (ML) systems led to the rise of Software Engineering for Artificial Intelligence (SE4AI), which addresses the unique engineering challenges of these systems. Researchers in SE4AI engage with three primary types of ML projects: those that apply ML techniques, those that develop new ML methodologies, and those that provide support tools and libraries. Current classification schemas distinguish ML projects based on their purpose and engineering quality, yet they miss a fine-grained classification of their nature and purpose. In this paper, we propose a novel, tool-supported automated classification schema for ML projects, coined <span><strong><u>M</u></strong>achine learning <strong><u>A</u></strong>utomated <strong><u>R</u></strong>ule-based Classification <strong><u>K</u></strong>it</span> (MARK), that builds on top of the work by Gonzalez et al. to refine the classification of applied ML projects into <em>‘ML-Model Consumers,’ ‘ML-Model Producers,’</em> and <em>‘ML-Model Producers & Consumers.’</em> We evaluated MARK through two empirical studies. The first assessed its classification accuracy across 4,603 ML projects from two datasets. The second analyzed repository metrics, such as community engagement, activity, and structure, to demonstrate MARK’s potential in identifying trends and characteristics unique to each project type. Our findings indicate high F1-scores for our classifier, particularly for <em>‘ML-Model Producer’</em> projects, though challenges remain for <em>‘ML-Model Consumer’</em> classification. Significant differences in repository metrics among the classified projects highlight the usefulness of MARK, offering insights for researchers studying the socio-technical dynamics of ML projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 112471"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Into the ML-Universe: An improved classification and characterization of machine-learning projects\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo De Martino, Gilberto Recupito, Giammaria Giordano, Filomena Ferrucci, Dario Di Nucci, Fabio Palomba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prominence of Machine Learning (ML) systems led to the rise of Software Engineering for Artificial Intelligence (SE4AI), which addresses the unique engineering challenges of these systems. Researchers in SE4AI engage with three primary types of ML projects: those that apply ML techniques, those that develop new ML methodologies, and those that provide support tools and libraries. Current classification schemas distinguish ML projects based on their purpose and engineering quality, yet they miss a fine-grained classification of their nature and purpose. In this paper, we propose a novel, tool-supported automated classification schema for ML projects, coined <span><strong><u>M</u></strong>achine learning <strong><u>A</u></strong>utomated <strong><u>R</u></strong>ule-based Classification <strong><u>K</u></strong>it</span> (MARK), that builds on top of the work by Gonzalez et al. to refine the classification of applied ML projects into <em>‘ML-Model Consumers,’ ‘ML-Model Producers,’</em> and <em>‘ML-Model Producers & Consumers.’</em> We evaluated MARK through two empirical studies. The first assessed its classification accuracy across 4,603 ML projects from two datasets. The second analyzed repository metrics, such as community engagement, activity, and structure, to demonstrate MARK’s potential in identifying trends and characteristics unique to each project type. Our findings indicate high F1-scores for our classifier, particularly for <em>‘ML-Model Producer’</em> projects, though challenges remain for <em>‘ML-Model Consumer’</em> classification. Significant differences in repository metrics among the classified projects highlight the usefulness of MARK, offering insights for researchers studying the socio-technical dynamics of ML projects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225001396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225001396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Into the ML-Universe: An improved classification and characterization of machine-learning projects
The prominence of Machine Learning (ML) systems led to the rise of Software Engineering for Artificial Intelligence (SE4AI), which addresses the unique engineering challenges of these systems. Researchers in SE4AI engage with three primary types of ML projects: those that apply ML techniques, those that develop new ML methodologies, and those that provide support tools and libraries. Current classification schemas distinguish ML projects based on their purpose and engineering quality, yet they miss a fine-grained classification of their nature and purpose. In this paper, we propose a novel, tool-supported automated classification schema for ML projects, coined Machine learning Automated Rule-based Classification Kit (MARK), that builds on top of the work by Gonzalez et al. to refine the classification of applied ML projects into ‘ML-Model Consumers,’ ‘ML-Model Producers,’ and ‘ML-Model Producers & Consumers.’ We evaluated MARK through two empirical studies. The first assessed its classification accuracy across 4,603 ML projects from two datasets. The second analyzed repository metrics, such as community engagement, activity, and structure, to demonstrate MARK’s potential in identifying trends and characteristics unique to each project type. Our findings indicate high F1-scores for our classifier, particularly for ‘ML-Model Producer’ projects, though challenges remain for ‘ML-Model Consumer’ classification. Significant differences in repository metrics among the classified projects highlight the usefulness of MARK, offering insights for researchers studying the socio-technical dynamics of ML projects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
•Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution
•Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development
•Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems
•Human factors and management concerns of software development
•Data management and big data issues of software systems
•Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources
•Business and economic aspects of software development processes
The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.