过去是怎样的,应该是怎样的:朝着更好地衡量未婚妇女避孕普及率的方向发展

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Apoorva Jadhav, Madeleine Short Fabic, Kerry MacQuarrie
{"title":"过去是怎样的,应该是怎样的:朝着更好地衡量未婚妇女避孕普及率的方向发展","authors":"Apoorva Jadhav, Madeleine Short Fabic, Kerry MacQuarrie","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contraceptive prevalence among unmarried women—calculated from the response to a version of the question—<jats:italic>“Are you or your partner currently doing something or using any method to delay or avoid getting pregnant?”</jats:italic> is most accurately measured among those who report sexual recency within the previous four weeks. This approach, long adopted by The Demographic and Health Surveys Program (DHS), has recently been adopted by groups such as FP2030 and Track20. Since this shift toward increased standardization, the DHS Program has included in its core questionnaire questions to better capture contraceptive use at last sex. We use these new DHS data from seven countries to explore whether a composite contraceptive use measure (i.e., current contraceptive use + contraceptive use at last sex) provides a more meaningful assessment of contraceptive use among unmarried women. Based on our findings, we recommend that the family planning field adopt the composite contraceptive use measure as its standard approach for measuring contraceptive prevalence among unmarried women. Our findings provide a guide for more accurately measuring, reporting, and most importantly, understanding the contraceptive practices of unmarried women.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"277 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How It Was and How It Should Be: Moving Toward a Better Measurement of Contraceptive Prevalence Among Unmarried Women\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva Jadhav, Madeleine Short Fabic, Kerry MacQuarrie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sifp.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contraceptive prevalence among unmarried women—calculated from the response to a version of the question—<jats:italic>“Are you or your partner currently doing something or using any method to delay or avoid getting pregnant?”</jats:italic> is most accurately measured among those who report sexual recency within the previous four weeks. This approach, long adopted by The Demographic and Health Surveys Program (DHS), has recently been adopted by groups such as FP2030 and Track20. Since this shift toward increased standardization, the DHS Program has included in its core questionnaire questions to better capture contraceptive use at last sex. We use these new DHS data from seven countries to explore whether a composite contraceptive use measure (i.e., current contraceptive use + contraceptive use at last sex) provides a more meaningful assessment of contraceptive use among unmarried women. Based on our findings, we recommend that the family planning field adopt the composite contraceptive use measure as its standard approach for measuring contraceptive prevalence among unmarried women. Our findings provide a guide for more accurately measuring, reporting, and most importantly, understanding the contraceptive practices of unmarried women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Family Planning\",\"volume\":\"277 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Family Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未婚女性的避孕普及率——通过回答“你或你的伴侣目前是否在采取措施或使用任何方法来推迟或避免怀孕?”在最近四周内发生性行为的人群中,这一比例最为准确。人口与健康调查项目(DHS)长期采用这种方法,最近FP2030和Track20等组织也采用了这种方法。由于这种向日益标准化的转变,国土安全部计划在其核心问卷问题中纳入了更好地了解最后性生活中避孕药具使用情况的问题。我们使用来自7个国家的这些新的人口与健康调查数据来探索复合避孕措施使用方法(即当前避孕使用+最后一次性行为避孕使用)是否能更有意义地评估未婚妇女的避孕使用情况。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议计划生育领域采用综合避孕措施作为衡量未婚妇女避孕普及率的标准方法。我们的研究结果为更准确地测量、报告和最重要的是理解未婚妇女的避孕措施提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How It Was and How It Should Be: Moving Toward a Better Measurement of Contraceptive Prevalence Among Unmarried Women
Contraceptive prevalence among unmarried women—calculated from the response to a version of the question—“Are you or your partner currently doing something or using any method to delay or avoid getting pregnant?” is most accurately measured among those who report sexual recency within the previous four weeks. This approach, long adopted by The Demographic and Health Surveys Program (DHS), has recently been adopted by groups such as FP2030 and Track20. Since this shift toward increased standardization, the DHS Program has included in its core questionnaire questions to better capture contraceptive use at last sex. We use these new DHS data from seven countries to explore whether a composite contraceptive use measure (i.e., current contraceptive use + contraceptive use at last sex) provides a more meaningful assessment of contraceptive use among unmarried women. Based on our findings, we recommend that the family planning field adopt the composite contraceptive use measure as its standard approach for measuring contraceptive prevalence among unmarried women. Our findings provide a guide for more accurately measuring, reporting, and most importantly, understanding the contraceptive practices of unmarried women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信