治疗性电刺激技术在周围神经精确修复中的应用进展:述评。

Vernon Kennedy, Mackenzie D Long, Jordan Walters, Adenike A Adewuyi, Colin K Franz
{"title":"治疗性电刺激技术在周围神经精确修复中的应用进展:述评。","authors":"Vernon Kennedy, Mackenzie D Long, Jordan Walters, Adenike A Adewuyi, Colin K Franz","doi":"10.4103/atn.atn-d-24-00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve injuries affect large numbers of individuals each year, often resulting in long-term disabilities due to impairments in motor and sensory function. With traditional treatment approaches, including surgical repair and rehabilitation, the most common outcome is incomplete recovery. This is compounded by the absence of FDA-approved medications to enhance nerve regeneration. Recent advances in therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) techniques have shown promise to improve axonal regrowth and functional recovery. Typically administered perioperatively in a single 1-hour session, TES has demonstrated efficacy in both preclinical studies and small clinical trials by promoting faster and more complete axonal regeneration. To address the limitations of traditional TES, including infection risks or lead displacement, the recent development of bioresorbable nerve stimulator implants introduces a groundbreaking solution. Furthermore, patient-specific factors, including age, sex, medical comorbidities, and genetic variability, notably interact with clinical outcomes and potentially responsiveness to TES. Such genes include the prevalent Val66Met genetic polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (rs6265). Carriers of rs6265 have less nerve regeneration, impaired activity-dependent BDNF secretion and a diminished response to TES in preclinical study. This highlights the growing importance of tailoring TES protocols to each patient for optimal outcomes. Looking ahead, the future of TES in PNI treatment will involve the integration of more sophisticated nerve stimulators to deliver tailored TES protocols, with careful consideration given to patient-specific factors and personalized rehabilitation strategies to maximize functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":520923,"journal":{"name":"Advanced technology in neuroscience..","volume":"2 2","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applications of advances in therapeutic electrical stimulation techniques and technologies in precision peripheral nerve repair: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Vernon Kennedy, Mackenzie D Long, Jordan Walters, Adenike A Adewuyi, Colin K Franz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atn.atn-d-24-00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peripheral nerve injuries affect large numbers of individuals each year, often resulting in long-term disabilities due to impairments in motor and sensory function. With traditional treatment approaches, including surgical repair and rehabilitation, the most common outcome is incomplete recovery. This is compounded by the absence of FDA-approved medications to enhance nerve regeneration. Recent advances in therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) techniques have shown promise to improve axonal regrowth and functional recovery. Typically administered perioperatively in a single 1-hour session, TES has demonstrated efficacy in both preclinical studies and small clinical trials by promoting faster and more complete axonal regeneration. To address the limitations of traditional TES, including infection risks or lead displacement, the recent development of bioresorbable nerve stimulator implants introduces a groundbreaking solution. Furthermore, patient-specific factors, including age, sex, medical comorbidities, and genetic variability, notably interact with clinical outcomes and potentially responsiveness to TES. Such genes include the prevalent Val66Met genetic polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (rs6265). Carriers of rs6265 have less nerve regeneration, impaired activity-dependent BDNF secretion and a diminished response to TES in preclinical study. This highlights the growing importance of tailoring TES protocols to each patient for optimal outcomes. Looking ahead, the future of TES in PNI treatment will involve the integration of more sophisticated nerve stimulators to deliver tailored TES protocols, with careful consideration given to patient-specific factors and personalized rehabilitation strategies to maximize functional recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced technology in neuroscience..\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"97-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced technology in neuroscience..\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atn.atn-d-24-00023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced technology in neuroscience..","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atn.atn-d-24-00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

周围神经损伤每年影响大量个体,通常由于运动和感觉功能受损而导致长期残疾。传统的治疗方法,包括手术修复和康复,最常见的结果是不完全恢复。由于缺乏fda批准的增强神经再生的药物,这种情况更加严重。治疗性电刺激(TES)技术的最新进展显示出改善轴突再生和功能恢复的希望。TES通常在围手术期进行一次1小时的治疗,通过促进更快、更完整的轴突再生,在临床前研究和小型临床试验中都证明了其有效性。为了解决传统TES的局限性,包括感染风险或铅置换,最近发展的生物可吸收神经刺激器植入物引入了一种突破性的解决方案。此外,患者的特定因素,包括年龄、性别、医疗合并症和遗传变异,明显与临床结果和对TES的潜在反应相互作用。这些基因包括脑源性神经营养因子基因(rs6265)中普遍存在的Val66Met遗传多态性。在临床前研究中,rs6265携带者神经再生减少,活动依赖性BDNF分泌受损,对TES的反应减弱。这凸显了为每位患者量身定制TES方案以获得最佳结果的重要性。展望未来,TES在PNI治疗中的应用将包括整合更复杂的神经刺激器,以提供量身定制的TES方案,并仔细考虑患者的具体因素和个性化的康复策略,以最大限度地恢复功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applications of advances in therapeutic electrical stimulation techniques and technologies in precision peripheral nerve repair: a narrative review.

Peripheral nerve injuries affect large numbers of individuals each year, often resulting in long-term disabilities due to impairments in motor and sensory function. With traditional treatment approaches, including surgical repair and rehabilitation, the most common outcome is incomplete recovery. This is compounded by the absence of FDA-approved medications to enhance nerve regeneration. Recent advances in therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) techniques have shown promise to improve axonal regrowth and functional recovery. Typically administered perioperatively in a single 1-hour session, TES has demonstrated efficacy in both preclinical studies and small clinical trials by promoting faster and more complete axonal regeneration. To address the limitations of traditional TES, including infection risks or lead displacement, the recent development of bioresorbable nerve stimulator implants introduces a groundbreaking solution. Furthermore, patient-specific factors, including age, sex, medical comorbidities, and genetic variability, notably interact with clinical outcomes and potentially responsiveness to TES. Such genes include the prevalent Val66Met genetic polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (rs6265). Carriers of rs6265 have less nerve regeneration, impaired activity-dependent BDNF secretion and a diminished response to TES in preclinical study. This highlights the growing importance of tailoring TES protocols to each patient for optimal outcomes. Looking ahead, the future of TES in PNI treatment will involve the integration of more sophisticated nerve stimulators to deliver tailored TES protocols, with careful consideration given to patient-specific factors and personalized rehabilitation strategies to maximize functional recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信