2011 - 2023年成人颅内病理微创入路目录与演变

Max Yang, Ishan Shah, Alex Renn, Vivek Satish, Gage A Guerra, David Gomez, David J Cote, Stephanie Cheok, Racheal Peterson, Tyler Cardinal, Robert G Briggs, Jonathan Sisti, Gabriel Zada
{"title":"2011 - 2023年成人颅内病理微创入路目录与演变","authors":"Max Yang, Ishan Shah, Alex Renn, Vivek Satish, Gage A Guerra, David Gomez, David J Cote, Stephanie Cheok, Racheal Peterson, Tyler Cardinal, Robert G Briggs, Jonathan Sisti, Gabriel Zada","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) presents an attractive alternative to conventional open cranial approaches because it limits tissue exposure, promotes wound healing, and enhances patient satisfaction. This study aimed to describe our experience with selection and use of prospectively catalogued MIS cranial approaches to treat a variety of pathologies, highlighting clinical outcomes and trends over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing cranial surgery by the senior author at our institution between 2011 and 2023. Cases were classified as open or MIS at the time of surgery. We defined MIS as inclusive of any endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted keyhole, or port-based approach, including channel-based neuro-endoscopy, endoscopic-assisted craniotomy, and exoscopic port-based approaches. The details of each approach, the pathological target, and major postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the 13-year inclusion period, 1371 MIS procedures were performed, comprising 54% of 2540 cranial neurosurgical operations. There was a marked increase in the proportion of MIS cases from 49.4% in the initial half to 58.4% in the final half of the timeline (P = .002). The majority of MIS cases were endoscopic endonasal approaches (n = 1068, 77.9%), including 742 (69.5%) direct and 326 (30.5%) extended approaches to treat skull base lesions. Endoscopic channel-based (n = 86, 6.3%) and keyhole approaches (n = 114, 8.3%) were used to access cortical and subcortical lesions. Hybrid microscopic/endoscopic, exoscopic/endoscopic, and blue-light endoscopic procedures increased substantially in the later years of the cohort. Complication rates changed from 12.3% to 10.7% for MIS and 11.9% to 14.2% for open cases when comparing initial with subsequent years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIS approaches have become increasingly valuable tools in our surgical armamentarium over the past decade, as evidenced by the evolving proportion of MIS procedures performed over time. Reasonable complication profiles further contribute to the efficacy and safety of MIS cranial approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catalogue and Evolution of Minimally Invasive Approaches for Adult Intracranial Pathology From 2011 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Max Yang, Ishan Shah, Alex Renn, Vivek Satish, Gage A Guerra, David Gomez, David J Cote, Stephanie Cheok, Racheal Peterson, Tyler Cardinal, Robert G Briggs, Jonathan Sisti, Gabriel Zada\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) presents an attractive alternative to conventional open cranial approaches because it limits tissue exposure, promotes wound healing, and enhances patient satisfaction. This study aimed to describe our experience with selection and use of prospectively catalogued MIS cranial approaches to treat a variety of pathologies, highlighting clinical outcomes and trends over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing cranial surgery by the senior author at our institution between 2011 and 2023. Cases were classified as open or MIS at the time of surgery. We defined MIS as inclusive of any endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted keyhole, or port-based approach, including channel-based neuro-endoscopy, endoscopic-assisted craniotomy, and exoscopic port-based approaches. The details of each approach, the pathological target, and major postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the 13-year inclusion period, 1371 MIS procedures were performed, comprising 54% of 2540 cranial neurosurgical operations. There was a marked increase in the proportion of MIS cases from 49.4% in the initial half to 58.4% in the final half of the timeline (P = .002). The majority of MIS cases were endoscopic endonasal approaches (n = 1068, 77.9%), including 742 (69.5%) direct and 326 (30.5%) extended approaches to treat skull base lesions. Endoscopic channel-based (n = 86, 6.3%) and keyhole approaches (n = 114, 8.3%) were used to access cortical and subcortical lesions. Hybrid microscopic/endoscopic, exoscopic/endoscopic, and blue-light endoscopic procedures increased substantially in the later years of the cohort. Complication rates changed from 12.3% to 10.7% for MIS and 11.9% to 14.2% for open cases when comparing initial with subsequent years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIS approaches have become increasingly valuable tools in our surgical armamentarium over the past decade, as evidenced by the evolving proportion of MIS procedures performed over time. Reasonable complication profiles further contribute to the efficacy and safety of MIS cranial approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:微创手术(MIS)是传统开颅手术的一种有吸引力的替代方法,因为它限制了组织暴露,促进伤口愈合,提高了患者满意度。本研究旨在描述我们在选择和使用前瞻性分类的MIS颅入路治疗各种病理方面的经验,强调临床结果和趋势。方法:我们使用了由资深作者在2011年至2023年期间在我院接受颅外科手术的患者的前瞻性维护数据库。病例在手术时被分类为开放或MIS。我们将MIS定义为包括任何内窥镜,内窥镜辅助锁眼或基于端口的入路,包括基于通道的神经内窥镜,内窥镜辅助开颅术和外窥镜基于端口的入路。记录并分析每条入路的细节、病理靶点及术后主要并发症。结果:在13年的纳入期内,进行了1371例MIS手术,占2540例颅神经外科手术的54%。MIS病例的比例从前半期的49.4%显著增加到后半期的58.4% (P = 0.002)。大多数MIS病例采用鼻内镜入路(1068例,77.9%),其中直接入路742例(69.5%),延伸入路326例(30.5%)。采用内镜下通道入路(n = 86, 6.3%)和锁孔入路(n = 114, 8.3%)进入皮质和皮质下病变。显微/内窥镜、外窥镜/内窥镜和蓝光内窥镜混合手术在队列的后期显著增加。与随后的年份相比,MIS的并发症发生率从12.3%变化到10.7%,开放性病例从11.9%变化到14.2%。结论:在过去的十年中,MIS入路已经成为我们外科设备中越来越有价值的工具,随着时间的推移,MIS手术的比例不断变化。合理的并发症概况进一步提高MIS颅脑入路的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catalogue and Evolution of Minimally Invasive Approaches for Adult Intracranial Pathology From 2011 to 2023.

Background and objectives: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) presents an attractive alternative to conventional open cranial approaches because it limits tissue exposure, promotes wound healing, and enhances patient satisfaction. This study aimed to describe our experience with selection and use of prospectively catalogued MIS cranial approaches to treat a variety of pathologies, highlighting clinical outcomes and trends over time.

Methods: We used a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing cranial surgery by the senior author at our institution between 2011 and 2023. Cases were classified as open or MIS at the time of surgery. We defined MIS as inclusive of any endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted keyhole, or port-based approach, including channel-based neuro-endoscopy, endoscopic-assisted craniotomy, and exoscopic port-based approaches. The details of each approach, the pathological target, and major postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results: Within the 13-year inclusion period, 1371 MIS procedures were performed, comprising 54% of 2540 cranial neurosurgical operations. There was a marked increase in the proportion of MIS cases from 49.4% in the initial half to 58.4% in the final half of the timeline (P = .002). The majority of MIS cases were endoscopic endonasal approaches (n = 1068, 77.9%), including 742 (69.5%) direct and 326 (30.5%) extended approaches to treat skull base lesions. Endoscopic channel-based (n = 86, 6.3%) and keyhole approaches (n = 114, 8.3%) were used to access cortical and subcortical lesions. Hybrid microscopic/endoscopic, exoscopic/endoscopic, and blue-light endoscopic procedures increased substantially in the later years of the cohort. Complication rates changed from 12.3% to 10.7% for MIS and 11.9% to 14.2% for open cases when comparing initial with subsequent years.

Conclusion: MIS approaches have become increasingly valuable tools in our surgical armamentarium over the past decade, as evidenced by the evolving proportion of MIS procedures performed over time. Reasonable complication profiles further contribute to the efficacy and safety of MIS cranial approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信