Shanen M Mulles, Daniel Z Aziz, C Chase Binion, Neha Pai, Sophia L Maragos, Meredith E Flattum, Monica Kowalczyk, Anna Volerman, Teresa K Woodruff, Melina R Kibbe
{"title":"迈向性别包容:性别作为生物学变量的观点。","authors":"Shanen M Mulles, Daniel Z Aziz, C Chase Binion, Neha Pai, Sophia L Maragos, Meredith E Flattum, Monica Kowalczyk, Anna Volerman, Teresa K Woodruff, Melina R Kibbe","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.1009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy on sex as a biological variable (SABV) was implemented in 2016 to encourage researchers to consider both sexes within their study design. However, there continues to be ongoing debate regarding the utility of this initiative. This study aimed to evaluate opinions of the SABV policy among study section members and how these varied by self-reported sex. <b><i>Method:</i></b> An 18-question survey was sent <i>via</i> email in 2023 to 20,803 study section members who participated in a review session from May 15 to July 15 in 2020, 2021, 2022, or 2023. Survey questions were based on a previously published study surveying study section members from 2016 to 2017 to allow for comparison of results. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 3,699 individuals responded to the survey (17.7%). Among respondents, 52.1% self-identified as male, and 69.8% conduct basic/translational research. Fewer respondents received resources to learn about the policy in 2020-2023 compared to 2016-2017 (<i>n</i> = 2,147, 58.0% versus <i>n</i> = 848, 73.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). More respondents in 2020-2023 felt that considering SABV would improve the rigor and reproducibility of NIH-funded research compared to 2016-2017 (<i>n</i> = 2,630, 71.1% versus <i>n</i> = 654, 56.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, only 2,358 (63.7%) respondents felt it was important for all NIH-funded research to consider SABV within experimental design, similar to 2016-2017 (<i>n</i> = 766, 66.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.2). Fewer male respondents compared to female respondents felt considering SABV would improve rigor and reproducibility (<i>n</i> = 1,325, 68.8% versus <i>n</i> = 1,285, 74.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and fewer male compared to female respondents felt it was important for all NIH-funded research to consider SABV within their experimental design (<i>n</i> = 1171, 60.9% versus <i>n</i> = 1170, 67.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Since the implementation of the SABV policy, diverse perspectives continue to exist among study section members. Continued efforts are required in order to understand how sex can be incorporated into research for the benefit of all people.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":"1204-1212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Sex Inclusivity: Perspectives on Sex as a Biological Variable.\",\"authors\":\"Shanen M Mulles, Daniel Z Aziz, C Chase Binion, Neha Pai, Sophia L Maragos, Meredith E Flattum, Monica Kowalczyk, Anna Volerman, Teresa K Woodruff, Melina R Kibbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.1009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy on sex as a biological variable (SABV) was implemented in 2016 to encourage researchers to consider both sexes within their study design. However, there continues to be ongoing debate regarding the utility of this initiative. This study aimed to evaluate opinions of the SABV policy among study section members and how these varied by self-reported sex. <b><i>Method:</i></b> An 18-question survey was sent <i>via</i> email in 2023 to 20,803 study section members who participated in a review session from May 15 to July 15 in 2020, 2021, 2022, or 2023. Survey questions were based on a previously published study surveying study section members from 2016 to 2017 to allow for comparison of results. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 3,699 individuals responded to the survey (17.7%). Among respondents, 52.1% self-identified as male, and 69.8% conduct basic/translational research. Fewer respondents received resources to learn about the policy in 2020-2023 compared to 2016-2017 (<i>n</i> = 2,147, 58.0% versus <i>n</i> = 848, 73.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). More respondents in 2020-2023 felt that considering SABV would improve the rigor and reproducibility of NIH-funded research compared to 2016-2017 (<i>n</i> = 2,630, 71.1% versus <i>n</i> = 654, 56.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, only 2,358 (63.7%) respondents felt it was important for all NIH-funded research to consider SABV within experimental design, similar to 2016-2017 (<i>n</i> = 766, 66.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.2). Fewer male respondents compared to female respondents felt considering SABV would improve rigor and reproducibility (<i>n</i> = 1,325, 68.8% versus <i>n</i> = 1,285, 74.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and fewer male compared to female respondents felt it was important for all NIH-funded research to consider SABV within their experimental design (<i>n</i> = 1171, 60.9% versus <i>n</i> = 1170, 67.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Since the implementation of the SABV policy, diverse perspectives continue to exist among study section members. Continued efforts are required in order to understand how sex can be incorporated into research for the benefit of all people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1204-1212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.1009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.1009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)关于性别作为生物变量(SABV)的政策于2016年实施,以鼓励研究人员在研究设计中考虑两性。然而,关于这一倡议的效用仍然存在持续的争论。本研究旨在评估研究小组成员对SABV政策的意见,以及这些意见如何随自我报告的性别而变化。方法:在2023年通过电子邮件向20,803名研究小组成员发送了一份18个问题的调查,这些成员参加了2020年,2021年,2022年或2023年5月15日至7月15日的复习会议。调查问题基于先前发表的一项研究,调查了2016年至2017年的研究部门成员,以便对结果进行比较。结果:共有3699人(17.7%)参与了本次调查。在受访者中,52.1%的人自认为是男性,69.8%的人从事基础/转化研究。与2016-2017年相比,2020-2023年获得了解政策资源的受访者较少(n = 2147, 58.0%对n = 848, 73.0%, p < 0.001)。2020-2023年更多的受访者认为,与2016-2017年相比,考虑SABV将提高nih资助研究的严谨性和可重复性(n = 2630, 71.1%对n = 654,56.3%, p < 0.001)。然而,只有2358名(63.7%)受访者认为所有nih资助的研究在实验设计中考虑SABV很重要,与2016-2017年相似(n = 766, 66.0%, p = 0.2)。与女性受访者相比,较少的男性受访者认为考虑SABV会提高严谨性和可重复性(n = 1,325, 68.8%对n = 1,285, 74.6%, p < 0.001),与女性受访者相比,较少的男性受访者认为所有nih资助的研究在实验设计中考虑SABV很重要(n = 1171, 60.9%对n = 1170, 67.9%, p < 0.001)。结论:自SABV政策实施以来,研究小组成员之间继续存在不同的观点。为了了解如何将性纳入造福所有人的研究,需要继续努力。
Toward Sex Inclusivity: Perspectives on Sex as a Biological Variable.
Purpose: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy on sex as a biological variable (SABV) was implemented in 2016 to encourage researchers to consider both sexes within their study design. However, there continues to be ongoing debate regarding the utility of this initiative. This study aimed to evaluate opinions of the SABV policy among study section members and how these varied by self-reported sex. Method: An 18-question survey was sent via email in 2023 to 20,803 study section members who participated in a review session from May 15 to July 15 in 2020, 2021, 2022, or 2023. Survey questions were based on a previously published study surveying study section members from 2016 to 2017 to allow for comparison of results. Results: A total of 3,699 individuals responded to the survey (17.7%). Among respondents, 52.1% self-identified as male, and 69.8% conduct basic/translational research. Fewer respondents received resources to learn about the policy in 2020-2023 compared to 2016-2017 (n = 2,147, 58.0% versus n = 848, 73.0%, p < 0.001). More respondents in 2020-2023 felt that considering SABV would improve the rigor and reproducibility of NIH-funded research compared to 2016-2017 (n = 2,630, 71.1% versus n = 654, 56.3%, p < 0.001). However, only 2,358 (63.7%) respondents felt it was important for all NIH-funded research to consider SABV within experimental design, similar to 2016-2017 (n = 766, 66.0%, p = 0.2). Fewer male respondents compared to female respondents felt considering SABV would improve rigor and reproducibility (n = 1,325, 68.8% versus n = 1,285, 74.6%, p < 0.001), and fewer male compared to female respondents felt it was important for all NIH-funded research to consider SABV within their experimental design (n = 1171, 60.9% versus n = 1170, 67.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Since the implementation of the SABV policy, diverse perspectives continue to exist among study section members. Continued efforts are required in order to understand how sex can be incorporated into research for the benefit of all people.