磁共振成像诊断胎盘增生谱的准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7
Suzi AbdelAziz, Nour A El-Goly, Ahmed M Maged, Nehal Bassiouny, Nihal El-Demiry, Ahmed Shamel
{"title":"磁共振成像诊断胎盘增生谱的准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Suzi AbdelAziz, Nour A El-Goly, Ahmed M Maged, Nehal Bassiouny, Nihal El-Demiry, Ahmed Shamel","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search from database inception to November 2023 using terms such as placenta creta, increta, percreta, PAS, MRI, and their respective Medical Subject Headings terms. All prospective and retrospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies involving prenatal magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of PAS with subsequent pathological confirmation were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 studies encompassing 3664 women met the inclusion criteria, with 1894 cases confirmed pathologically as PAS. The overall sensitivity of MRI was 0.867 (95% confidence interval (<i>CI</i>): 0.807-0.910), and the specificity was 0.860 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.799-0.905), with a correlation of 0.693 between sensitivity and specificity. The estimated odds ratio was 28.693 (95% <i>CI</i>: 14.463-56.924), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.178 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.122-0.258), and the positive likelihood ratio was 4.316 (95% <i>CI</i>: 3.186-5.846). Analysis of individual MRI criteria revealed estimates of sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio for abnormal placental bed vascularization as 0.500, 0.740, 2.788, 0.571, and 1.645 respectively; 0.384, 0.985, 6.270, 0.471, and 2.720 for bladder wall interruption; 0.766, 0.818, 13.638, 0.262, and 3.375 for the presence of dark intraplacental bands; 0.691, 0.913, 10.828, 0.352, and 3.361 for heterogeneous placenta; 0.688, 0.984, 34.886, 0.254, and 7.164 for indistinctive myometrium; 0.757, 0.864, 8.496, 0.362, and 2.778 for loss of retroplacental dark zone; 0.828, 0.593, 5.829, 0.329, and 1.766 for myometrial thinning; and 0.518, 0.916, 9.473, 0.411, and 3.526 for placental bulge, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI demonstrates significant utility in diagnosing PAS and its severity. It is recommended for use in all cases with inconclusive ultrasonographic findings.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Registration number CRD42021267501.</p>","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":"7 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Suzi AbdelAziz, Nour A El-Goly, Ahmed M Maged, Nehal Bassiouny, Nihal El-Demiry, Ahmed Shamel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search from database inception to November 2023 using terms such as placenta creta, increta, percreta, PAS, MRI, and their respective Medical Subject Headings terms. All prospective and retrospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies involving prenatal magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of PAS with subsequent pathological confirmation were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 studies encompassing 3664 women met the inclusion criteria, with 1894 cases confirmed pathologically as PAS. The overall sensitivity of MRI was 0.867 (95% confidence interval (<i>CI</i>): 0.807-0.910), and the specificity was 0.860 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.799-0.905), with a correlation of 0.693 between sensitivity and specificity. The estimated odds ratio was 28.693 (95% <i>CI</i>: 14.463-56.924), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.178 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.122-0.258), and the positive likelihood ratio was 4.316 (95% <i>CI</i>: 3.186-5.846). Analysis of individual MRI criteria revealed estimates of sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio for abnormal placental bed vascularization as 0.500, 0.740, 2.788, 0.571, and 1.645 respectively; 0.384, 0.985, 6.270, 0.471, and 2.720 for bladder wall interruption; 0.766, 0.818, 13.638, 0.262, and 3.375 for the presence of dark intraplacental bands; 0.691, 0.913, 10.828, 0.352, and 3.361 for heterogeneous placenta; 0.688, 0.984, 34.886, 0.254, and 7.164 for indistinctive myometrium; 0.757, 0.864, 8.496, 0.362, and 2.778 for loss of retroplacental dark zone; 0.828, 0.593, 5.829, 0.329, and 1.766 for myometrial thinning; and 0.518, 0.916, 9.473, 0.411, and 3.526 for placental bulge, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI demonstrates significant utility in diagnosing PAS and its severity. It is recommended for use in all cases with inconclusive ultrasonographic findings.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Registration number CRD42021267501.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价磁共振成像(MRI)对增胎盘谱(PAS)的诊断准确性。方法:从数据库建立到2023年11月,我们进行了全面的文献检索,使用的术语包括胎盘、increta、percreta、PAS、MRI及其各自的医学主题词。所有涉及产前磁共振成像诊断PAS并随后病理证实的前瞻性和回顾性队列、病例对照和横断面研究均被纳入。结果:共有40项研究包括3664名女性符合纳入标准,其中1894例病理证实为PAS。MRI的总体敏感性为0.867(95%可信区间(CI): 0.807-0.910),特异性为0.860 (95% CI: 0.799-0.905),敏感性与特异性的相关系数为0.693。估计比值比为28.693 (95% CI: 14.463 ~ 56.924),阴性似然比为0.178 (95% CI: 0.122 ~ 0.258),阳性似然比为4.316 (95% CI: 3.186 ~ 5.846)。单个MRI标准分析显示,胎盘床异常血管化的敏感性、特异性、比值比、阴性似然比和阳性似然比分别为0.500、0.740、2.788、0.571和1.645;膀胱壁中断0.384、0.985、6.270、0.471、2.720;为0.766,0.818,13.638,0.262,3.375;异源性胎盘为0.691、0.913、10.828、0.352、3.361;肌层不明显的分别为0.688、0.984、34.886、0.254、7.164;胎盘后暗区缺失为0.757、0.864、8.496、0.362、2.778;肌层变薄:0.828、0.593、5.829、0.329、1.766;胎盘膨出分别为0.518、0.916、9.473、0.411、3.526。结论:MRI对PAS及其严重程度的诊断具有重要意义。推荐用于所有超声检查结果不确定的病例。注册号:CRD42021267501。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search from database inception to November 2023 using terms such as placenta creta, increta, percreta, PAS, MRI, and their respective Medical Subject Headings terms. All prospective and retrospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies involving prenatal magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of PAS with subsequent pathological confirmation were included.

Results: A total of 40 studies encompassing 3664 women met the inclusion criteria, with 1894 cases confirmed pathologically as PAS. The overall sensitivity of MRI was 0.867 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.807-0.910), and the specificity was 0.860 (95% CI: 0.799-0.905), with a correlation of 0.693 between sensitivity and specificity. The estimated odds ratio was 28.693 (95% CI: 14.463-56.924), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.178 (95% CI: 0.122-0.258), and the positive likelihood ratio was 4.316 (95% CI: 3.186-5.846). Analysis of individual MRI criteria revealed estimates of sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio for abnormal placental bed vascularization as 0.500, 0.740, 2.788, 0.571, and 1.645 respectively; 0.384, 0.985, 6.270, 0.471, and 2.720 for bladder wall interruption; 0.766, 0.818, 13.638, 0.262, and 3.375 for the presence of dark intraplacental bands; 0.691, 0.913, 10.828, 0.352, and 3.361 for heterogeneous placenta; 0.688, 0.984, 34.886, 0.254, and 7.164 for indistinctive myometrium; 0.757, 0.864, 8.496, 0.362, and 2.778 for loss of retroplacental dark zone; 0.828, 0.593, 5.829, 0.329, and 1.766 for myometrial thinning; and 0.518, 0.916, 9.473, 0.411, and 3.526 for placental bulge, respectively.

Conclusion: MRI demonstrates significant utility in diagnosing PAS and its severity. It is recommended for use in all cases with inconclusive ultrasonographic findings.

Registration: Registration number CRD42021267501.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信