桡骨远端骨折手术中器械辅助软组织活动的有效性:一项随机对照盲法临床研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Levent Horoz, Ismail Ceylan, Halil Alkan
{"title":"桡骨远端骨折手术中器械辅助软组织活动的有效性:一项随机对照盲法临床研究。","authors":"Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Levent Horoz, Ismail Ceylan, Halil Alkan","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization, one of the mobilization methods, in Distal Radius Fracture rehabilitation are quite limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on pain, range of motion and edema, grip strength and functionality in patients who underwent surgery with open reduction and internal fixation due to Distal Radius Fracture.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled blinded trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with volar plate due to Distal Radius Fracture were randomized into two groups as Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and control group. While all patients received conventional rehabilitation (CRP), patients in the Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group additionally received Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization with the Graston method. Circumference measurement, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Visual Analog Scale, grip strength, wrist joint range of motion measurements were performed at the beginning, fourth week and sixth week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the changes in Visual Analog Scale (rest, activity), range of motion (Flexion, Extension, Supination and Pronation), Edema, Handgrip Strength and Total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation data of the Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group and the control group over time (intra-group changes) were compared, a statistically significant change was found for all parameters except the Handgrip Strength variable (p < 0.05). In time-group comparisons, no statistical difference was found in Visual Analog Scale activity, range of motion extension, edema and Total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation parameters (p > 0.05), while a statistical difference was found in Visual Analog Scale rest, range of motion flexion, supination and pronation and hand grip strength parameters (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization applied to the CRP of patients who underwent surgery for Distal Radius Fracture is effective on grip strength and pronation. The addition of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization application to the conventional rehabilitation application did not provide additional effect on edema and functionality. Conventional rehabilitation alone is more effective on rest pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in patients operated for distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled blinded clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Levent Horoz, Ismail Ceylan, Halil Alkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization, one of the mobilization methods, in Distal Radius Fracture rehabilitation are quite limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on pain, range of motion and edema, grip strength and functionality in patients who underwent surgery with open reduction and internal fixation due to Distal Radius Fracture.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled blinded trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with volar plate due to Distal Radius Fracture were randomized into two groups as Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and control group. While all patients received conventional rehabilitation (CRP), patients in the Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group additionally received Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization with the Graston method. Circumference measurement, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Visual Analog Scale, grip strength, wrist joint range of motion measurements were performed at the beginning, fourth week and sixth week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the changes in Visual Analog Scale (rest, activity), range of motion (Flexion, Extension, Supination and Pronation), Edema, Handgrip Strength and Total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation data of the Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group and the control group over time (intra-group changes) were compared, a statistically significant change was found for all parameters except the Handgrip Strength variable (p < 0.05). In time-group comparisons, no statistical difference was found in Visual Analog Scale activity, range of motion extension, edema and Total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation parameters (p > 0.05), while a statistical difference was found in Visual Analog Scale rest, range of motion flexion, supination and pronation and hand grip strength parameters (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization applied to the CRP of patients who underwent surgery for Distal Radius Fracture is effective on grip strength and pronation. The addition of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization application to the conventional rehabilitation application did not provide additional effect on edema and functionality. Conventional rehabilitation alone is more effective on rest pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:器械辅助软组织活动作为桡骨远端骨折康复的一种活动方法,其有效性的研究资料相当有限。目的:本研究的目的是探讨器械辅助软组织活动对桡骨远端骨折行切开复位内固定手术患者疼痛、活动范围和水肿、握力和功能的影响。研究设计:随机对照盲法试验。方法:48例桡骨远端骨折行掌侧钢板切开复位内固定的患者随机分为器械辅助软组织活动术组和对照组。在所有患者接受常规康复(CRP)的同时,器械辅助软组织动员组患者还接受了Graston方法的器械辅助软组织动员。在开始、第4周和第6周进行围度测量、患者评定腕关节评估、视觉模拟量表、握力、腕关节活动范围测量。结果:比较器械辅助软组织活动组与对照组的视觉模拟量表(休息、活动)、活动度(屈伸、旋前、旋前)、水肿、握力和患者总腕关节评估数据随时间的变化(组内变化),除握力变量外,其余参数变化均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在时间组比较中,两组在视觉模拟量表活动度、运动范围伸展、水肿和总患者评定腕关节评价参数上无统计学差异(p < 0.05),而在视觉模拟量表休息、运动范围屈曲、旋前、旋前和握力参数上有统计学差异(p < 0.05)。结论:在桡骨远端骨折手术患者的CRP中加入器械辅助的软组织活动对握力和旋前是有效的。在常规康复应用中增加器械辅助软组织活动应用,对水肿和功能没有额外的影响。单纯的常规康复治疗对休息痛更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in patients operated for distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled blinded clinical study.

Background: Data on the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization, one of the mobilization methods, in Distal Radius Fracture rehabilitation are quite limited.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on pain, range of motion and edema, grip strength and functionality in patients who underwent surgery with open reduction and internal fixation due to Distal Radius Fracture.

Study design: Randomized controlled blinded trial.

Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with volar plate due to Distal Radius Fracture were randomized into two groups as Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and control group. While all patients received conventional rehabilitation (CRP), patients in the Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group additionally received Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization with the Graston method. Circumference measurement, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Visual Analog Scale, grip strength, wrist joint range of motion measurements were performed at the beginning, fourth week and sixth week.

Results: When the changes in Visual Analog Scale (rest, activity), range of motion (Flexion, Extension, Supination and Pronation), Edema, Handgrip Strength and Total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation data of the Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group and the control group over time (intra-group changes) were compared, a statistically significant change was found for all parameters except the Handgrip Strength variable (p < 0.05). In time-group comparisons, no statistical difference was found in Visual Analog Scale activity, range of motion extension, edema and Total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation parameters (p > 0.05), while a statistical difference was found in Visual Analog Scale rest, range of motion flexion, supination and pronation and hand grip strength parameters (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Adding Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization applied to the CRP of patients who underwent surgery for Distal Radius Fracture is effective on grip strength and pronation. The addition of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization application to the conventional rehabilitation application did not provide additional effect on edema and functionality. Conventional rehabilitation alone is more effective on rest pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信