胫骨开放性骨折的矫形入路:矫形外科医生是否应该接受带蒂皮瓣手术培训?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Léonard Vezole, Laurent Mathieu, Paul-Henri Bauwens, Frédéric Rongiéras, Antoine Bertani, Etienne Massardier
{"title":"胫骨开放性骨折的矫形入路:矫形外科医生是否应该接受带蒂皮瓣手术培训?","authors":"Léonard Vezole, Laurent Mathieu, Paul-Henri Bauwens, Frédéric Rongiéras, Antoine Bertani, Etienne Massardier","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of open tibial fractures has greatly benefited from the development of the orthoplastic approach. Despite advances in soft tissue reconstruction techniques, the use of simple pedicled flaps performed by orthopedic surgeons remains a relevant option.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>In the context of orthoplastic reconstruction of tibial fractures, the use of pedicled flaps performed by orthopedic surgeons can optimize soft tissue coverage strategies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 63 patients treated for open tibial fractures requiring soft tissue reconstruction between July 1, 2012, and July 1, 2021. Two groups were compared: Group 1 included patients operated on before July 1, 2018, when flaps were performed exclusively by plastic surgeons; Group 2 included patients operated on after July 1, 2018, when flaps were performed by either plastic or orthopedic surgeons. Demographic and injury-related data, type of flaps used, and the 1-month flap failure rate were analyzed. Time to coverage, time to soft tissue healing, and time to secondary internal fixation were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, 28 out of 45 patients (62%) underwent soft tissue coverage using flaps, of which 30 out of 31 flaps (97%) were performed by plastic surgeons. The free-to-pedicled flap ratio was 16:15. In Group 2, all 18 patients (100%) underwent flap coverage, of which 18 out of 20 flaps (90%) were performed by orthopedic surgeons. The free-to-pedicled flap ratio in this group was 2:18. The median time to coverage was significantly reduced in Group 2, from 28 days to 7 days (p < 0.05). Healing times were shortened. Flap failure rates were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the injury pattern allows, the use of pedicled flaps by orthopedic surgeons appears to reduce the time to coverage in open tibial fractures, thereby optimizing the orthoplastic reconstruction strategy. Training orthopedic surgeons in these simple, reliable, and reproducible reconstruction techniques is therefore recommended.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthoplastic approach for the management of open tibial fractures: Should Orthopedic surgeons be trained to perform pedicled flaps?\",\"authors\":\"Léonard Vezole, Laurent Mathieu, Paul-Henri Bauwens, Frédéric Rongiéras, Antoine Bertani, Etienne Massardier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of open tibial fractures has greatly benefited from the development of the orthoplastic approach. Despite advances in soft tissue reconstruction techniques, the use of simple pedicled flaps performed by orthopedic surgeons remains a relevant option.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>In the context of orthoplastic reconstruction of tibial fractures, the use of pedicled flaps performed by orthopedic surgeons can optimize soft tissue coverage strategies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 63 patients treated for open tibial fractures requiring soft tissue reconstruction between July 1, 2012, and July 1, 2021. Two groups were compared: Group 1 included patients operated on before July 1, 2018, when flaps were performed exclusively by plastic surgeons; Group 2 included patients operated on after July 1, 2018, when flaps were performed by either plastic or orthopedic surgeons. Demographic and injury-related data, type of flaps used, and the 1-month flap failure rate were analyzed. Time to coverage, time to soft tissue healing, and time to secondary internal fixation were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, 28 out of 45 patients (62%) underwent soft tissue coverage using flaps, of which 30 out of 31 flaps (97%) were performed by plastic surgeons. The free-to-pedicled flap ratio was 16:15. In Group 2, all 18 patients (100%) underwent flap coverage, of which 18 out of 20 flaps (90%) were performed by orthopedic surgeons. The free-to-pedicled flap ratio in this group was 2:18. The median time to coverage was significantly reduced in Group 2, from 28 days to 7 days (p < 0.05). Healing times were shortened. Flap failure rates were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the injury pattern allows, the use of pedicled flaps by orthopedic surgeons appears to reduce the time to coverage in open tibial fractures, thereby optimizing the orthoplastic reconstruction strategy. Training orthopedic surgeons in these simple, reliable, and reproducible reconstruction techniques is therefore recommended.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:胫骨开放性骨折的治疗得益于骨科入路的发展。尽管软组织重建技术的进步,使用简单带蒂皮瓣的骨科医生仍然是一个相关的选择。假设:在胫骨骨折正畸重建的背景下,骨科医生使用带蒂皮瓣可以优化软组织覆盖策略。材料与方法:对2012年7月1日至2021年7月1日63例需要软组织重建的胫骨开放性骨折患者进行回顾性研究。比较两组患者:第一组患者在2018年7月1日之前接受手术,当时皮瓣仅由整形外科医生进行;第二组包括2018年7月1日之后手术的患者,当时由整形或整形外科医生进行皮瓣手术。分析人口统计学和损伤相关数据、皮瓣类型和皮瓣1个月失败率。记录覆盖时间、软组织愈合时间和二次内固定时间,并比较两组间的差异。结果:在第1组,45例患者中有28例(62%)采用皮瓣覆盖软组织,其中31例皮瓣中有30例(97%)由整形外科医生完成。无蒂皮瓣比例为16:15。第2组18例患者(100%)均行皮瓣覆盖,其中18例(90%)由骨科医生完成。本组无蒂皮瓣比例为2:18。第2组的中位覆盖时间从28天显著缩短至7天(p结论:当损伤模式允许时,骨科医生使用带蒂皮瓣似乎可以减少胫骨开放性骨折的覆盖时间,从而优化了骨科重建策略。因此,建议对骨科医生进行这些简单、可靠、可重复的重建技术的培训。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthoplastic approach for the management of open tibial fractures: Should Orthopedic surgeons be trained to perform pedicled flaps?

Introduction: The management of open tibial fractures has greatly benefited from the development of the orthoplastic approach. Despite advances in soft tissue reconstruction techniques, the use of simple pedicled flaps performed by orthopedic surgeons remains a relevant option.

Hypothesis: In the context of orthoplastic reconstruction of tibial fractures, the use of pedicled flaps performed by orthopedic surgeons can optimize soft tissue coverage strategies.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 63 patients treated for open tibial fractures requiring soft tissue reconstruction between July 1, 2012, and July 1, 2021. Two groups were compared: Group 1 included patients operated on before July 1, 2018, when flaps were performed exclusively by plastic surgeons; Group 2 included patients operated on after July 1, 2018, when flaps were performed by either plastic or orthopedic surgeons. Demographic and injury-related data, type of flaps used, and the 1-month flap failure rate were analyzed. Time to coverage, time to soft tissue healing, and time to secondary internal fixation were recorded and compared between groups.

Results: In Group 1, 28 out of 45 patients (62%) underwent soft tissue coverage using flaps, of which 30 out of 31 flaps (97%) were performed by plastic surgeons. The free-to-pedicled flap ratio was 16:15. In Group 2, all 18 patients (100%) underwent flap coverage, of which 18 out of 20 flaps (90%) were performed by orthopedic surgeons. The free-to-pedicled flap ratio in this group was 2:18. The median time to coverage was significantly reduced in Group 2, from 28 days to 7 days (p < 0.05). Healing times were shortened. Flap failure rates were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: When the injury pattern allows, the use of pedicled flaps by orthopedic surgeons appears to reduce the time to coverage in open tibial fractures, thereby optimizing the orthoplastic reconstruction strategy. Training orthopedic surgeons in these simple, reliable, and reproducible reconstruction techniques is therefore recommended.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信