局部晚期宫颈癌放疗前手术分期的生存获益:一项汇总分析。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Science Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI:10.1111/cas.70136
Huazhong Xu, Qu Zhang, Chengyan Luo, Mei Wang, Meng Tian, Xinchen Sun, Qin Qin
{"title":"局部晚期宫颈癌放疗前手术分期的生存获益:一项汇总分析。","authors":"Huazhong Xu,&nbsp;Qu Zhang,&nbsp;Chengyan Luo,&nbsp;Mei Wang,&nbsp;Meng Tian,&nbsp;Xinchen Sun,&nbsp;Qin Qin","doi":"10.1111/cas.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lymph node metastasis significantly impacts prognosis and treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Surgical staging offers precise information on node involvement, though its survival benefit is debated. We pooled data from 9 cohort studies involving 2553 patients to evaluate the benefit of pre-treatment surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Fixed effects models or random effects models were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The overall pooled results showed no difference in PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73–1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.65) or OS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74–1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.99) between the two approaches of lymph node staging. However, the subgroup analyses found the PFS superiority of surgical staging in patients with FIGO stage II (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Additionally, for the patients with no evidence of lymph node metastasis on imaging, surgical staging was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.86, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In the subgroup of patients with suspicious bulky nodes on imaging, lymph node debulking-based surgical staging did not significantly improve either PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72–1.31, <i>p</i> = 0.31) or OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.68–1.99, <i>p</i> = 0.59) in comparison with imaging staging. Surgical staging may not be applicable to all patients with LACC. However, for the patients with FIGO II disease or those without suspicious lymph node involvement on imaging, node surgery staging could afford a survival benefit.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO ID: CRD42024543768</p>","PeriodicalId":9580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":"116 9","pages":"2537-2546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cas.70136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Benefit of Surgical Staging Before Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Pooled Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Huazhong Xu,&nbsp;Qu Zhang,&nbsp;Chengyan Luo,&nbsp;Mei Wang,&nbsp;Meng Tian,&nbsp;Xinchen Sun,&nbsp;Qin Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cas.70136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lymph node metastasis significantly impacts prognosis and treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Surgical staging offers precise information on node involvement, though its survival benefit is debated. We pooled data from 9 cohort studies involving 2553 patients to evaluate the benefit of pre-treatment surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Fixed effects models or random effects models were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The overall pooled results showed no difference in PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73–1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.65) or OS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74–1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.99) between the two approaches of lymph node staging. However, the subgroup analyses found the PFS superiority of surgical staging in patients with FIGO stage II (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Additionally, for the patients with no evidence of lymph node metastasis on imaging, surgical staging was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.86, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In the subgroup of patients with suspicious bulky nodes on imaging, lymph node debulking-based surgical staging did not significantly improve either PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72–1.31, <i>p</i> = 0.31) or OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.68–1.99, <i>p</i> = 0.59) in comparison with imaging staging. Surgical staging may not be applicable to all patients with LACC. However, for the patients with FIGO II disease or those without suspicious lymph node involvement on imaging, node surgery staging could afford a survival benefit.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO ID: CRD42024543768</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Science\",\"volume\":\"116 9\",\"pages\":\"2537-2546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cas.70136\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.70136\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.70136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴结转移对局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)预后和治疗有显著影响。手术分期提供了淋巴结受累的精确信息,尽管其生存效益存在争议。我们汇集了9项队列研究的数据,涉及2553例患者,以评估局部晚期宫颈癌患者治疗前手术分期的益处。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算合并风险比(hr)。总体合并结果显示两种淋巴结分期方法的PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73-1.22, p = 0.65)和OS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.35, p = 0.99)无差异。然而,亚组分析发现FIGO II期患者手术分期的PFS优势(HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, p = 0.02)。此外,对于影像学上没有淋巴结转移证据的患者,手术分期与PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, p = 0.001)和OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.87, p = 0.01)的显著改善相关。在影像学上有可疑肿大淋巴结的患者亚组中,与影像学分期相比,基于淋巴结减容的手术分期并没有显著改善PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72-1.31, p = 0.31)或OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.68-1.99, p = 0.59)。手术分期可能并不适用于所有LACC患者。然而,对于FIGO II疾病患者或影像学上无可疑淋巴结累及的患者,淋巴结手术分期可提供生存益处。试验注册:PROSPERO ID: CRD42024543768。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Survival Benefit of Surgical Staging Before Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Pooled Analysis

Survival Benefit of Surgical Staging Before Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Pooled Analysis

Lymph node metastasis significantly impacts prognosis and treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Surgical staging offers precise information on node involvement, though its survival benefit is debated. We pooled data from 9 cohort studies involving 2553 patients to evaluate the benefit of pre-treatment surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Fixed effects models or random effects models were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The overall pooled results showed no difference in PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73–1.22, p = 0.65) or OS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74–1.35, p = 0.99) between the two approaches of lymph node staging. However, the subgroup analyses found the PFS superiority of surgical staging in patients with FIGO stage II (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.95, p = 0.02). Additionally, for the patients with no evidence of lymph node metastasis on imaging, surgical staging was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.86, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.87, p = 0.01). In the subgroup of patients with suspicious bulky nodes on imaging, lymph node debulking-based surgical staging did not significantly improve either PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72–1.31, p = 0.31) or OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.68–1.99, p = 0.59) in comparison with imaging staging. Surgical staging may not be applicable to all patients with LACC. However, for the patients with FIGO II disease or those without suspicious lymph node involvement on imaging, node surgery staging could afford a survival benefit.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024543768

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science 医学-肿瘤学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信