卫生专业教育的一致性学习方法:范围综述。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1658
Antoine Roche, Ann Alexandra Rodriguez Turcot, Andréanne St-Pierre, Sarah Cherrier, Marie-Claude Audétat, Bernard Charlin, Joseph-Omer Dyer
{"title":"卫生专业教育的一致性学习方法:范围综述。","authors":"Antoine Roche, Ann Alexandra Rodriguez Turcot, Andréanne St-Pierre, Sarah Cherrier, Marie-Claude Audétat, Bernard Charlin, Joseph-Omer Dyer","doi":"10.5334/pme.1658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning by concordance (LbC) is an educational approach designed to develop expertise, particularly in the field of clinical reasoning (CR) among healthcare professionals. It is based on the script concordance test (SCT) with the addition of feedback based on expert responses. The objective of this study was to map the scientific literature on this rapidly growing learning approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar up to March 10, 2025. Eligible primary studies had to focus on the LbC approach targeting healthcare learners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: twenty focused on the implementation of the LbC approach and eight on its development. Most of the studies used mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results mainly indicate that learners perceive the LbC approach as engaging and beneficial for decision-making. The articles mention five elements related to the development of LbC that would contribute to its success.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The LbC approach could be applicable to a wide range of disciplines and learning levels. The variability in the procedures for developing the approach, as well as the variability of the objectives and methodologies of the studies, limit the comparability of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LbC is a promising approach for promoting decision-making skills in a variety of uncertain clinical contexts. The concept of standardized development and evaluation frameworks for this approach could improve its applicability, effectiveness and reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"387-398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning-by-Concordance Approach in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Roche, Ann Alexandra Rodriguez Turcot, Andréanne St-Pierre, Sarah Cherrier, Marie-Claude Audétat, Bernard Charlin, Joseph-Omer Dyer\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/pme.1658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning by concordance (LbC) is an educational approach designed to develop expertise, particularly in the field of clinical reasoning (CR) among healthcare professionals. It is based on the script concordance test (SCT) with the addition of feedback based on expert responses. The objective of this study was to map the scientific literature on this rapidly growing learning approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar up to March 10, 2025. Eligible primary studies had to focus on the LbC approach targeting healthcare learners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: twenty focused on the implementation of the LbC approach and eight on its development. Most of the studies used mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results mainly indicate that learners perceive the LbC approach as engaging and beneficial for decision-making. The articles mention five elements related to the development of LbC that would contribute to its success.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The LbC approach could be applicable to a wide range of disciplines and learning levels. The variability in the procedures for developing the approach, as well as the variability of the objectives and methodologies of the studies, limit the comparability of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LbC is a promising approach for promoting decision-making skills in a variety of uncertain clinical contexts. The concept of standardized development and evaluation frameworks for this approach could improve its applicability, effectiveness and reproducibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"387-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1658\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过一致性学习(LbC)是一种旨在发展专业知识的教育方法,特别是在医疗保健专业人员的临床推理(CR)领域。它基于脚本一致性测试(SCT),并添加了基于专家回答的反馈。这项研究的目的是绘制关于这种快速发展的学习方法的科学文献。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley框架和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。系统检索截至2025年3月10日的MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar。合格的初级研究必须关注针对医疗保健学习者的LbC方法。结果:28项研究符合纳入标准:20项研究关注LbC方法的实施,8项研究关注其发展。大多数研究采用混合方法(定量和定性)。结果主要表明,学习者认为LbC方法具有参与性,有利于决策。文章提到了与LbC发展相关的五个因素,这些因素将有助于LbC的成功。讨论:LbC方法可以适用于广泛的学科和学习水平。制定方法的程序的可变性,以及研究的目标和方法的可变性,限制了结果的可比性。结论:LbC是在各种不确定的临床环境中提高决策技能的一种有前途的方法。这种方法的标准化发展和评价框架的概念可以提高其适用性、有效性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning-by-Concordance Approach in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Learning by concordance (LbC) is an educational approach designed to develop expertise, particularly in the field of clinical reasoning (CR) among healthcare professionals. It is based on the script concordance test (SCT) with the addition of feedback based on expert responses. The objective of this study was to map the scientific literature on this rapidly growing learning approach.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar up to March 10, 2025. Eligible primary studies had to focus on the LbC approach targeting healthcare learners.

Results: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: twenty focused on the implementation of the LbC approach and eight on its development. Most of the studies used mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results mainly indicate that learners perceive the LbC approach as engaging and beneficial for decision-making. The articles mention five elements related to the development of LbC that would contribute to its success.

Discussion: The LbC approach could be applicable to a wide range of disciplines and learning levels. The variability in the procedures for developing the approach, as well as the variability of the objectives and methodologies of the studies, limit the comparability of the results.

Conclusion: LbC is a promising approach for promoting decision-making skills in a variety of uncertain clinical contexts. The concept of standardized development and evaluation frameworks for this approach could improve its applicability, effectiveness and reproducibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信