{"title":"弥散性癌症患者行颈动脉内膜切除术30天死亡率和血栓栓塞的风险更高:来自ACS-NSQIP数据库2011 - 2022年的视角","authors":"Renxi Li, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/17085381251360066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAtherosclerosis in carotid arteries can lead to carotid stenosis, where carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the first-line intervention. Malignancy has a two-way relationship with atherosclerosis, where they share common molecular pathways in their pathophysiology. However, the postoperative outcomes of CEA in patients with disseminated cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the 30-day outcomes of CEA in patients with disseminated cancer.MethodsPatients with and without disseminated cancer who underwent CEA were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2011 to 2022. Patients with age <18 years were excluded. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to address preoperative differences between the cohorts. Thirty postoperative outcomes were examined.ResultsThere were 148 (0.37%) patients with disseminated cancer who went under CEA. Meanwhile, 40,028 patients without disseminated cancer underwent CEA, where 740 of them were matched to those with disseminated cancer. After 1:5 propensity-score matching, disseminated cancer patients had higher risks of 30-day mortality (4.73% vs 1.62%, <i>p</i> = .03), and deep vein thrombosis (3.38% vs 0.68%, <i>p</i> = .01), while stroke, transient ischemic attacks, and other 30-day outcomes were comparable between the groups.ConclusionPatients with disseminated cancer had higher thromboembolism and mortality after CEA. Given the prevalence of cancer-related thrombosis and its associated increased mortality risk, effective prophylaxis and treatment for venous thromboembolism, such as low molecular weight heparin administration, should be essential in patients with disseminated cancer. These findings can also be valuable for preoperative risk stratification and in determining the surgical candidacy of patients with disseminated cancer in CEA. CEA for asymptomatic patients with disseminated cancer may require further justification given their elevated perioperative risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251360066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher risks of thirty-day mortality and thromboembolism in disseminated cancer patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A perspective from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2011 to 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Renxi Li, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381251360066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAtherosclerosis in carotid arteries can lead to carotid stenosis, where carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the first-line intervention. Malignancy has a two-way relationship with atherosclerosis, where they share common molecular pathways in their pathophysiology. However, the postoperative outcomes of CEA in patients with disseminated cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the 30-day outcomes of CEA in patients with disseminated cancer.MethodsPatients with and without disseminated cancer who underwent CEA were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2011 to 2022. Patients with age <18 years were excluded. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to address preoperative differences between the cohorts. Thirty postoperative outcomes were examined.ResultsThere were 148 (0.37%) patients with disseminated cancer who went under CEA. Meanwhile, 40,028 patients without disseminated cancer underwent CEA, where 740 of them were matched to those with disseminated cancer. After 1:5 propensity-score matching, disseminated cancer patients had higher risks of 30-day mortality (4.73% vs 1.62%, <i>p</i> = .03), and deep vein thrombosis (3.38% vs 0.68%, <i>p</i> = .01), while stroke, transient ischemic attacks, and other 30-day outcomes were comparable between the groups.ConclusionPatients with disseminated cancer had higher thromboembolism and mortality after CEA. Given the prevalence of cancer-related thrombosis and its associated increased mortality risk, effective prophylaxis and treatment for venous thromboembolism, such as low molecular weight heparin administration, should be essential in patients with disseminated cancer. These findings can also be valuable for preoperative risk stratification and in determining the surgical candidacy of patients with disseminated cancer in CEA. CEA for asymptomatic patients with disseminated cancer may require further justification given their elevated perioperative risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17085381251360066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251360066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251360066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景颈动脉硬化可导致颈动脉狭窄,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是一线干预措施。恶性肿瘤与动脉粥样硬化具有双向关系,它们在病理生理上具有共同的分子通路。然而,CEA在播散性癌患者中的术后结果尚不清楚。本研究旨在研究CEA在弥散性癌症患者中的30天预后。方法在ACS-NSQIP 2011 - 2022年的目标数据库中确定患有和未患有CEA的患者。年龄p = .03)、深静脉血栓形成(3.38% vs . 0.68%, p = .01),而卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作和其他30天预后在两组之间具有可比性。结论经CEA治疗的弥散性肿瘤患者血栓栓塞率和死亡率较高。考虑到癌症相关血栓的患病率及其相关的死亡风险增加,对静脉血栓栓塞的有效预防和治疗,如低分子肝素治疗,对于弥散性癌症患者应该是必不可少的。这些发现对于术前风险分层和确定CEA弥散性癌患者的手术候选性也有价值。考虑到无症状的弥散性癌症患者围手术期风险升高,CEA的应用可能需要进一步的论证。
Higher risks of thirty-day mortality and thromboembolism in disseminated cancer patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A perspective from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2011 to 2022.
BackgroundAtherosclerosis in carotid arteries can lead to carotid stenosis, where carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the first-line intervention. Malignancy has a two-way relationship with atherosclerosis, where they share common molecular pathways in their pathophysiology. However, the postoperative outcomes of CEA in patients with disseminated cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the 30-day outcomes of CEA in patients with disseminated cancer.MethodsPatients with and without disseminated cancer who underwent CEA were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2011 to 2022. Patients with age <18 years were excluded. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to address preoperative differences between the cohorts. Thirty postoperative outcomes were examined.ResultsThere were 148 (0.37%) patients with disseminated cancer who went under CEA. Meanwhile, 40,028 patients without disseminated cancer underwent CEA, where 740 of them were matched to those with disseminated cancer. After 1:5 propensity-score matching, disseminated cancer patients had higher risks of 30-day mortality (4.73% vs 1.62%, p = .03), and deep vein thrombosis (3.38% vs 0.68%, p = .01), while stroke, transient ischemic attacks, and other 30-day outcomes were comparable between the groups.ConclusionPatients with disseminated cancer had higher thromboembolism and mortality after CEA. Given the prevalence of cancer-related thrombosis and its associated increased mortality risk, effective prophylaxis and treatment for venous thromboembolism, such as low molecular weight heparin administration, should be essential in patients with disseminated cancer. These findings can also be valuable for preoperative risk stratification and in determining the surgical candidacy of patients with disseminated cancer in CEA. CEA for asymptomatic patients with disseminated cancer may require further justification given their elevated perioperative risk.
期刊介绍:
Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.