Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Sung Tan Cho, Jaruphitchaya Homlakhorn, Peem Sarasombath
{"title":"经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的有效性比较:椎弓根下与Kambin三角技术:单中心经验。","authors":"Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Sung Tan Cho, Jaruphitchaya Homlakhorn, Peem Sarasombath","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is a widely employed intervention for managing radicular pain associated with spinal pathology. Among the various techniques utilized for TFESI, the subpedicular and Kambin's triangle approaches are prominent. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate and compare the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profiles of these two techniques of TFESI in alleviating pain and improving functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with unilateral radicular leg pain due to single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups: subpedicular TFESI (n=50) and Kambin's triangle TFESI (n=50). Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and functional outcomes were evaluated via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Data were collected at baseline, immediate post-procedure, and follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 8 months. Adverse events, procedure duration, and costs were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in NRS and ODI scores from baseline to final follow-up (P<0.001). The mean operation time was 25.55±2.01 min for the subpedicular technique and 24.16±3.56 min for the Kambin's triangle technique, with no significant difference (P=0.23). Similarly, treatment costs were comparable (mean 214±5.32 <i>vs.</i> 211±4.36 USD; P=0.43). No significant differences in pain relief, functional improvement, or adverse event rates were observed between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the subpedicular and Kambin's triangle techniques for TFESI show comparable efficacy and safety in managing radicular leg pain from LDH. Clinicians can select either method based on patient-specific factors and surgeon preference. However, additional prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and further inform clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"296-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection: subpedicular versus Kambin's triangle technique: a single-centre experience.\",\"authors\":\"Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Sung Tan Cho, Jaruphitchaya Homlakhorn, Peem Sarasombath\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-24-140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is a widely employed intervention for managing radicular pain associated with spinal pathology. Among the various techniques utilized for TFESI, the subpedicular and Kambin's triangle approaches are prominent. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate and compare the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profiles of these two techniques of TFESI in alleviating pain and improving functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with unilateral radicular leg pain due to single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups: subpedicular TFESI (n=50) and Kambin's triangle TFESI (n=50). Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and functional outcomes were evaluated via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Data were collected at baseline, immediate post-procedure, and follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 8 months. Adverse events, procedure duration, and costs were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in NRS and ODI scores from baseline to final follow-up (P<0.001). The mean operation time was 25.55±2.01 min for the subpedicular technique and 24.16±3.56 min for the Kambin's triangle technique, with no significant difference (P=0.23). Similarly, treatment costs were comparable (mean 214±5.32 <i>vs.</i> 211±4.36 USD; P=0.43). No significant differences in pain relief, functional improvement, or adverse event rates were observed between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the subpedicular and Kambin's triangle techniques for TFESI show comparable efficacy and safety in managing radicular leg pain from LDH. Clinicians can select either method based on patient-specific factors and surgeon preference. However, additional prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and further inform clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"296-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection: subpedicular versus Kambin's triangle technique: a single-centre experience.
Background: Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is a widely employed intervention for managing radicular pain associated with spinal pathology. Among the various techniques utilized for TFESI, the subpedicular and Kambin's triangle approaches are prominent. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate and compare the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profiles of these two techniques of TFESI in alleviating pain and improving functional outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with unilateral radicular leg pain due to single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups: subpedicular TFESI (n=50) and Kambin's triangle TFESI (n=50). Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and functional outcomes were evaluated via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Data were collected at baseline, immediate post-procedure, and follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 8 months. Adverse events, procedure duration, and costs were also analyzed.
Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in NRS and ODI scores from baseline to final follow-up (P<0.001). The mean operation time was 25.55±2.01 min for the subpedicular technique and 24.16±3.56 min for the Kambin's triangle technique, with no significant difference (P=0.23). Similarly, treatment costs were comparable (mean 214±5.32 vs. 211±4.36 USD; P=0.43). No significant differences in pain relief, functional improvement, or adverse event rates were observed between the two techniques.
Conclusions: Both the subpedicular and Kambin's triangle techniques for TFESI show comparable efficacy and safety in managing radicular leg pain from LDH. Clinicians can select either method based on patient-specific factors and surgeon preference. However, additional prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and further inform clinical decision-making.