胃食管反流病与亚马逊网站

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Richard Wong, Tomas Navarro-Rodriguez, Ronnie Fass
{"title":"胃食管反流病与亚马逊网站","authors":"Richard Wong, Tomas Navarro-Rodriguez, Ronnie Fass","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amazon.com is the largest online retailer and marketplace in the United States for electronic commerce. Many people rely on the platform to gain knowledge about many medical disorders and to purchase products based on this understanding. The information presented on this vast electronic-commerce platform is oftentimes misleading and may not be supported by scientific medical evidence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this article is to critically and scientifically evaluate the Amazon.com platform as it relates to products that are being marketed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to assess the scientific validity of their claims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Amazon.com was accessed and searched based on titles and subtitles related to GERD. Strength of evidence grades for medical claims of products for purchase on the platform were determined based on the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), based on published scientific and medical literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High evidence was only found for weight loss and certain medications such as antacids, H-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and potassium-competitive acid blockers; Moderate evidence for GERD pillows; low evidence for combination of melatonin with medications (except for omeprazole); and insufficient evidence for GERD teas, supplements, majority of diet books, probiotics, apple cider vinegar, exercises, and nontraditional treatments such as Old Amish Formula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual consumers should critically evaluate information from social media, consider scientific evidence, and consult reliable sources of accurate information before deciding to purchase over-the-counter products that are widely marketed to the general public for the treatment of medical disorders such as GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Amazon.com.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Wong, Tomas Navarro-Rodriguez, Ronnie Fass\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amazon.com is the largest online retailer and marketplace in the United States for electronic commerce. Many people rely on the platform to gain knowledge about many medical disorders and to purchase products based on this understanding. The information presented on this vast electronic-commerce platform is oftentimes misleading and may not be supported by scientific medical evidence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this article is to critically and scientifically evaluate the Amazon.com platform as it relates to products that are being marketed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to assess the scientific validity of their claims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Amazon.com was accessed and searched based on titles and subtitles related to GERD. Strength of evidence grades for medical claims of products for purchase on the platform were determined based on the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), based on published scientific and medical literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High evidence was only found for weight loss and certain medications such as antacids, H-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and potassium-competitive acid blockers; Moderate evidence for GERD pillows; low evidence for combination of melatonin with medications (except for omeprazole); and insufficient evidence for GERD teas, supplements, majority of diet books, probiotics, apple cider vinegar, exercises, and nontraditional treatments such as Old Amish Formula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual consumers should critically evaluate information from social media, consider scientific evidence, and consult reliable sources of accurate information before deciding to purchase over-the-counter products that are widely marketed to the general public for the treatment of medical disorders such as GERD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:亚马逊是美国最大的在线零售商和电子商务市场。许多人依靠这个平台获取许多医疗疾病的知识,并在此基础上购买产品。在这个庞大的电子商务平台上提供的信息往往具有误导性,可能没有科学的医学证据支持。目的:本文的目的是批判性和科学地评估亚马逊平台,因为它与正在销售的用于治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的产品有关,并评估其声明的科学有效性。方法:基于与GERD相关的标题和副标题进入亚马逊网站进行检索。平台上购买产品的医疗声明证据强度等级是根据美国卫生保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的循证实践中心(EPC)计划,根据已发表的科学和医学文献确定的。结果:高证据仅发现减肥和某些药物,如抗酸剂、H-2受体拮抗剂、质子泵抑制剂和钾竞争性酸阻滞剂;中度证据表明存在胃反流枕头;褪黑素与药物联合使用的证据不足(奥美拉唑除外);而反流茶、补品、大多数饮食书籍、益生菌、苹果醋、锻炼和传统疗法(如旧阿米什配方)的证据不足。结论:个人消费者应审慎评估社交媒体上的信息,考虑科学证据,并在决定购买广泛向公众销售的用于治疗胃食管反流等医学疾病的非处方药之前,咨询可靠的准确信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Amazon.com.

Background: Amazon.com is the largest online retailer and marketplace in the United States for electronic commerce. Many people rely on the platform to gain knowledge about many medical disorders and to purchase products based on this understanding. The information presented on this vast electronic-commerce platform is oftentimes misleading and may not be supported by scientific medical evidence.

Aims: The aim of this article is to critically and scientifically evaluate the Amazon.com platform as it relates to products that are being marketed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to assess the scientific validity of their claims.

Methods: Amazon.com was accessed and searched based on titles and subtitles related to GERD. Strength of evidence grades for medical claims of products for purchase on the platform were determined based on the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), based on published scientific and medical literature.

Results: High evidence was only found for weight loss and certain medications such as antacids, H-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and potassium-competitive acid blockers; Moderate evidence for GERD pillows; low evidence for combination of melatonin with medications (except for omeprazole); and insufficient evidence for GERD teas, supplements, majority of diet books, probiotics, apple cider vinegar, exercises, and nontraditional treatments such as Old Amish Formula.

Conclusions: Individual consumers should critically evaluate information from social media, consider scientific evidence, and consult reliable sources of accurate information before deciding to purchase over-the-counter products that are widely marketed to the general public for the treatment of medical disorders such as GERD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信