{"title":"转移性尿路上皮癌患者对维多汀原发耐药的相关因素:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Daiki Ikarashi, Nozomi Hayakawa, Go Kaneko, Yuma Sakura, Yuki Endo, Ryo Yamashita, Suguru Shirotake, Yukihiro Kondo, Eiji Kikuchi, Wataru Obara","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the primary resistance factors to enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy by comparing treatment outcomes between the early progressive disease (EPD) group and non-EPD group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV monotherapy across five institutions between 2019 and 2024. The patients were categorized into the EPD group (n = 34), defined by radiologically confirmed progressive disease within 3 months of EV initiation, and the non-EPD group (n = 87). The clinical parameters and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. The emergence of new metastatic lesions was defined as the detection of metastases in organs not previously identified as metastatic sites at baseline, during prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before the initiation of EV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival was significantly shorter in the EPD group than in the non-EPD group (6.5 vs. 19.9 months, p < 0.001). The EPD group had a significantly higher incidence of new metastatic lesions and a lower prevalence of normal Hb levels. Multivariate analysis identified low Hb and the presence of new metastatic lesions as independent predictors of EPD. Among patients with new metastases in the EPD group, an average of 74% of lesions emerged during ICI treatment and 75% involved multiple foci. Notably, more than 50% of these new lesions showed progression at the same sites following EV therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low hemoglobin levels and new metastatic lesions before EV treatment may be at increased risk for EPD. For these patients, alternative treatment strategies should be considered before initiating EV.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1841-1848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with primary resistance to enfortumab vedotin in previously treated patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Daiki Ikarashi, Nozomi Hayakawa, Go Kaneko, Yuma Sakura, Yuki Endo, Ryo Yamashita, Suguru Shirotake, Yukihiro Kondo, Eiji Kikuchi, Wataru Obara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the primary resistance factors to enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy by comparing treatment outcomes between the early progressive disease (EPD) group and non-EPD group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV monotherapy across five institutions between 2019 and 2024. The patients were categorized into the EPD group (n = 34), defined by radiologically confirmed progressive disease within 3 months of EV initiation, and the non-EPD group (n = 87). The clinical parameters and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. The emergence of new metastatic lesions was defined as the detection of metastases in organs not previously identified as metastatic sites at baseline, during prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before the initiation of EV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival was significantly shorter in the EPD group than in the non-EPD group (6.5 vs. 19.9 months, p < 0.001). The EPD group had a significantly higher incidence of new metastatic lesions and a lower prevalence of normal Hb levels. Multivariate analysis identified low Hb and the presence of new metastatic lesions as independent predictors of EPD. Among patients with new metastases in the EPD group, an average of 74% of lesions emerged during ICI treatment and 75% involved multiple foci. Notably, more than 50% of these new lesions showed progression at the same sites following EV therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low hemoglobin levels and new metastatic lesions before EV treatment may be at increased risk for EPD. For these patients, alternative treatment strategies should be considered before initiating EV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1841-1848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors associated with primary resistance to enfortumab vedotin in previously treated patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.
Background: To evaluate the primary resistance factors to enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy by comparing treatment outcomes between the early progressive disease (EPD) group and non-EPD group.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV monotherapy across five institutions between 2019 and 2024. The patients were categorized into the EPD group (n = 34), defined by radiologically confirmed progressive disease within 3 months of EV initiation, and the non-EPD group (n = 87). The clinical parameters and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. The emergence of new metastatic lesions was defined as the detection of metastases in organs not previously identified as metastatic sites at baseline, during prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before the initiation of EV.
Results: The median overall survival was significantly shorter in the EPD group than in the non-EPD group (6.5 vs. 19.9 months, p < 0.001). The EPD group had a significantly higher incidence of new metastatic lesions and a lower prevalence of normal Hb levels. Multivariate analysis identified low Hb and the presence of new metastatic lesions as independent predictors of EPD. Among patients with new metastases in the EPD group, an average of 74% of lesions emerged during ICI treatment and 75% involved multiple foci. Notably, more than 50% of these new lesions showed progression at the same sites following EV therapy.
Conclusions: Patients with low hemoglobin levels and new metastatic lesions before EV treatment may be at increased risk for EPD. For these patients, alternative treatment strategies should be considered before initiating EV.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.