Jamie Fried, Hunter L McQuistion, Jon Marrelli, Melvin C Hampton, Lingwei Wu, Alessandra LeGeros, Olga Lanina, W Gordon Frankle
{"title":"入门项目:扩展早期精神病以外的协调专业护理。","authors":"Jamie Fried, Hunter L McQuistion, Jon Marrelli, Melvin C Hampton, Lingwei Wu, Alessandra LeGeros, Olga Lanina, W Gordon Frankle","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the quality and potential clinical benefits of a novel program, called the Enhanced Treatment and Recovery (EnTRy) Program, which provides Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) without limits on diagnosis, age, or treatment time to individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). To assess recovery of participants, we compared the baseline Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) National Outcome Measures (NOMs) in patients enrolled in EnTRy to that at 6 months and 12 months. To explore whether EnTRy provided benefits over standard treatment, we compared the time engaged in treatment for the EnTRy cohort with that of a historic sample from the same clinical site. Participants were significantly less likely to have a psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days during follow-up assessment at 6 months (19% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, (χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1006) = 91, p<0.0001) and 12 months (16% at baseline, 1% at 12 months, χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p<0.0001). Participants were similarly less likely to have psychiatric emergency service encounters in the past 30 days at 6 months (18% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001) and at 12 months (16% at baseline, 2% at 12 months, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the EnTRy program remained engaged with care for significantly longer than a historical sample (p< 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox logrank) with a logrank hazard ratio of 2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43). Age and diagnosis-unlimited CSC may be particularly effective for individuals with SMI who recently received hospital level care and may help maintain gains in individuals who have aged out of programs dedicated to first episode psychiatric illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EnTRy Program: Expanding Coordinated Specialty Care Beyond Early Psychosis.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Fried, Hunter L McQuistion, Jon Marrelli, Melvin C Hampton, Lingwei Wu, Alessandra LeGeros, Olga Lanina, W Gordon Frankle\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the quality and potential clinical benefits of a novel program, called the Enhanced Treatment and Recovery (EnTRy) Program, which provides Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) without limits on diagnosis, age, or treatment time to individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). To assess recovery of participants, we compared the baseline Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) National Outcome Measures (NOMs) in patients enrolled in EnTRy to that at 6 months and 12 months. To explore whether EnTRy provided benefits over standard treatment, we compared the time engaged in treatment for the EnTRy cohort with that of a historic sample from the same clinical site. Participants were significantly less likely to have a psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days during follow-up assessment at 6 months (19% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, (χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1006) = 91, p<0.0001) and 12 months (16% at baseline, 1% at 12 months, χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p<0.0001). Participants were similarly less likely to have psychiatric emergency service encounters in the past 30 days at 6 months (18% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001) and at 12 months (16% at baseline, 2% at 12 months, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the EnTRy program remained engaged with care for significantly longer than a historical sample (p< 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox logrank) with a logrank hazard ratio of 2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43). Age and diagnosis-unlimited CSC may be particularly effective for individuals with SMI who recently received hospital level care and may help maintain gains in individuals who have aged out of programs dedicated to first episode psychiatric illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估一个新项目的质量和潜在的临床效益,该项目被称为增强治疗和康复(进入)项目,该项目为患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体提供不受诊断、年龄或治疗时间限制的协调专业护理(CSC)。为了评估参与者的恢复情况,我们比较了入组患者在6个月和12个月时的药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局(SAMSHA)国家结果测量(NOMs)基线。为了探讨入组是否优于标准治疗,我们将入组队列的治疗时间与来自同一临床地点的历史样本的治疗时间进行了比较。在6个月的随访评估中,参与者在过去30天内精神病住院的可能性显著降低(基线时为19%,6个月时为1%,(χ2 (1, N = 1006) = 91, p2 (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p2 (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001)和12个月时(基线时为16%,12个月时为2%,χ2(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001)。入组患者接受护理的时间明显超过历史样本(Mantel-Cox logrank统计p< 0.0001), logrank风险比为2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43)。年龄和诊断——不受限制的CSC可能对最近接受过医院级别护理的重度精神障碍患者特别有效,也可能有助于维持那些因年龄增长而退出首发精神疾病治疗项目的患者的获益。
The EnTRy Program: Expanding Coordinated Specialty Care Beyond Early Psychosis.
This study aims to evaluate the quality and potential clinical benefits of a novel program, called the Enhanced Treatment and Recovery (EnTRy) Program, which provides Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) without limits on diagnosis, age, or treatment time to individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). To assess recovery of participants, we compared the baseline Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) National Outcome Measures (NOMs) in patients enrolled in EnTRy to that at 6 months and 12 months. To explore whether EnTRy provided benefits over standard treatment, we compared the time engaged in treatment for the EnTRy cohort with that of a historic sample from the same clinical site. Participants were significantly less likely to have a psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days during follow-up assessment at 6 months (19% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, (χ2 (1, N = 1006) = 91, p<0.0001) and 12 months (16% at baseline, 1% at 12 months, χ2 (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p<0.0001). Participants were similarly less likely to have psychiatric emergency service encounters in the past 30 days at 6 months (18% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, χ2 (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001) and at 12 months (16% at baseline, 2% at 12 months, χ2(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the EnTRy program remained engaged with care for significantly longer than a historical sample (p< 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox logrank) with a logrank hazard ratio of 2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43). Age and diagnosis-unlimited CSC may be particularly effective for individuals with SMI who recently received hospital level care and may help maintain gains in individuals who have aged out of programs dedicated to first episode psychiatric illness.
期刊介绍:
Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.