数据知情的阶梯式护理(DiSC)改善肯尼亚青少年和年轻人艾滋病毒护理结果:一项聚类随机试验

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Pamela Kohler, Wenwen Jiang, Jacinta Badia, James Kibugi, Jessica Dyer, Julie Kadima, Dorothy Oketch, Kristin Beima-Sofie, Sarah Hicks, Barbra A. Richardson, Irene Inwani, Seema K. Shah, Kawango Agot, Grace John-Stewart
{"title":"数据知情的阶梯式护理(DiSC)改善肯尼亚青少年和年轻人艾滋病毒护理结果:一项聚类随机试验","authors":"Pamela Kohler,&nbsp;Wenwen Jiang,&nbsp;Jacinta Badia,&nbsp;James Kibugi,&nbsp;Jessica Dyer,&nbsp;Julie Kadima,&nbsp;Dorothy Oketch,&nbsp;Kristin Beima-Sofie,&nbsp;Sarah Hicks,&nbsp;Barbra A. Richardson,&nbsp;Irene Inwani,&nbsp;Seema K. Shah,&nbsp;Kawango Agot,&nbsp;Grace John-Stewart","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic use of data-driven tools to allocate care services based on needs, including differentiated care for stable individuals and intensive care for those with higher risk, may improve retention and viral suppression in adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AYLHIV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cluster randomised trial in western Kenya tested a data-informed stepped care intervention that assigned AYLHIV to four intensities of care according to need. AYLHIV at 12 intervention facilities underwent step assignment at each visit; those at lowest risk were offered differentiated models of service delivery (DSD), and those with risk factors more intensive services. AYLHIV at control sites received standard care. AYLHIV were followed for 12 months. Clinical and viral load data were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the proportion of missed visits (defined as &gt; 30 days late for scheduled visit). Secondary outcomes included loss to follow-up, viral non-suppression and assignment to DSD (multi-month refills or pharmacy fast-track visits). Mixed effects regression was clustered by individual and facility and adjusted for outcomes during the pre-enrolment period and baseline variables that differed by arm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between April and July 2022, 1911 AYLHIV ages 10–24 were enrolled (control: 1016, intervention: 895, 1708.8 person-years). Median age was 17, and 1512 (79.5%) were in school. Characteristics were balanced by arm, except for a higher proportion coming to the clinic alone in control arm (68.5% vs. 61.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). At intervention facilities, using the DiSC tool, 574 (64.6%) AYLHIV were assigned to DSD, 122 (13.7%) to standard care, 100 (11.3%) to mental health and retention counselling, and 92 (10.4%) to intensive case management. Missed visits were 8.5% in intervention versus 8.3% in control (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89−1.20); viral non-suppression (7.7% vs. 9.7%, aRR 0.79 95% CI: 0.54−1.16) and antiretroviral therapy adherence (92.8% vs. 94.6%, aRR 0.98 95% CI: 0.94−1.02) were similar between arms. AYLHIV in the intervention arm received more fast-track visits (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01−1.46). Intervention facilities experienced fewer scheduled appointments compared to control (aRR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91−0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.004).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, missed visits and non-suppression were infrequent (&lt; 10%) and did not decrease with the DiSC intervention. The DiSC intervention resulted in increased assignment to differentiated services without increasing missed visits or viral non-suppression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"28 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26501","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) to improve adolescent and young adult HIV care outcomes in Kenya: a cluster randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Kohler,&nbsp;Wenwen Jiang,&nbsp;Jacinta Badia,&nbsp;James Kibugi,&nbsp;Jessica Dyer,&nbsp;Julie Kadima,&nbsp;Dorothy Oketch,&nbsp;Kristin Beima-Sofie,&nbsp;Sarah Hicks,&nbsp;Barbra A. Richardson,&nbsp;Irene Inwani,&nbsp;Seema K. Shah,&nbsp;Kawango Agot,&nbsp;Grace John-Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jia2.26501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Systematic use of data-driven tools to allocate care services based on needs, including differentiated care for stable individuals and intensive care for those with higher risk, may improve retention and viral suppression in adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AYLHIV).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cluster randomised trial in western Kenya tested a data-informed stepped care intervention that assigned AYLHIV to four intensities of care according to need. AYLHIV at 12 intervention facilities underwent step assignment at each visit; those at lowest risk were offered differentiated models of service delivery (DSD), and those with risk factors more intensive services. AYLHIV at control sites received standard care. AYLHIV were followed for 12 months. Clinical and viral load data were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the proportion of missed visits (defined as &gt; 30 days late for scheduled visit). Secondary outcomes included loss to follow-up, viral non-suppression and assignment to DSD (multi-month refills or pharmacy fast-track visits). Mixed effects regression was clustered by individual and facility and adjusted for outcomes during the pre-enrolment period and baseline variables that differed by arm.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between April and July 2022, 1911 AYLHIV ages 10–24 were enrolled (control: 1016, intervention: 895, 1708.8 person-years). Median age was 17, and 1512 (79.5%) were in school. Characteristics were balanced by arm, except for a higher proportion coming to the clinic alone in control arm (68.5% vs. 61.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). At intervention facilities, using the DiSC tool, 574 (64.6%) AYLHIV were assigned to DSD, 122 (13.7%) to standard care, 100 (11.3%) to mental health and retention counselling, and 92 (10.4%) to intensive case management. Missed visits were 8.5% in intervention versus 8.3% in control (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89−1.20); viral non-suppression (7.7% vs. 9.7%, aRR 0.79 95% CI: 0.54−1.16) and antiretroviral therapy adherence (92.8% vs. 94.6%, aRR 0.98 95% CI: 0.94−1.02) were similar between arms. AYLHIV in the intervention arm received more fast-track visits (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01−1.46). Intervention facilities experienced fewer scheduled appointments compared to control (aRR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91−0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.004).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, missed visits and non-suppression were infrequent (&lt; 10%) and did not decrease with the DiSC intervention. The DiSC intervention resulted in increased assignment to differentiated services without increasing missed visits or viral non-suppression.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"volume\":\"28 S3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26501\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26501\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统地使用数据驱动的工具,根据需求分配护理服务,包括对病情稳定的个体进行差异化护理,对风险较高的个体进行重症监护,可能会改善感染艾滋病毒(AYLHIV)的青少年和年轻人的滞留和病毒抑制。方法:在肯尼亚西部进行的这组随机试验测试了一种数据知情的阶梯式护理干预,该干预根据需要将AYLHIV分配到四种护理强度。在12个干预设施的AYLHIV在每次访问时进行分步分配;为风险最低的人提供差异化的服务提供模式(DSD),为有风险因素的人提供更密集的服务。控制点的AYLHIV接受标准治疗。随访12个月。临床和病毒载量数据从病历中提取。主要结果是未就诊的比例(定义为>;预定访问时间晚30天)。次要结局包括随访失败、病毒无抑制和分配到DSD(多月补充或药房快速通道访问)。混合效应回归按个体和机构进行聚类,并根据入组前的结果和不同组的基线变量进行调整。结果于2022年4月至7月共入组1911例10-24岁的AYLHIV患者(对照组:1016例,干预组:895例,1708.8人年)。平均年龄为17岁,1512人(79.5%)在上学。除了对照组中单独来诊所的比例更高(68.5%比61.1%,p = 0.04),各组的特征都是平衡的。在干预设施中,使用DiSC工具,574例(64.6%)AYLHIV被分配到DSD, 122例(13.7%)被分配到标准护理,100例(11.3%)被分配到精神健康和保留咨询,92例(10.4%)被分配到强化病例管理。干预组的失诊率为8.5%,对照组为8.3%(校正风险比[aRR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89 ~ 1.20);病毒无抑制(7.7% vs. 9.7%, aRR 0.79 95% CI: 0.54 ~ 1.16)和抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性(92.8% vs. 94.6%, aRR 0.98 95% CI: 0.94 ~ 1.02)在两组之间相似。干预组的AYLHIV患者获得了更多的快速通道就诊(aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01−1.46)。与对照组相比,干预机构的预约预约较少(aRR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91 - 0.98, p = 0.004)。结论:总体而言,漏诊和非抑制发生率较低(<;10%),且不随DiSC干预而降低。DiSC干预增加了对差异化服务的分配,而没有增加漏诊或病毒无抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) to improve adolescent and young adult HIV care outcomes in Kenya: a cluster randomized trial

Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) to improve adolescent and young adult HIV care outcomes in Kenya: a cluster randomized trial

Introduction

Systematic use of data-driven tools to allocate care services based on needs, including differentiated care for stable individuals and intensive care for those with higher risk, may improve retention and viral suppression in adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AYLHIV).

Methods

This cluster randomised trial in western Kenya tested a data-informed stepped care intervention that assigned AYLHIV to four intensities of care according to need. AYLHIV at 12 intervention facilities underwent step assignment at each visit; those at lowest risk were offered differentiated models of service delivery (DSD), and those with risk factors more intensive services. AYLHIV at control sites received standard care. AYLHIV were followed for 12 months. Clinical and viral load data were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the proportion of missed visits (defined as > 30 days late for scheduled visit). Secondary outcomes included loss to follow-up, viral non-suppression and assignment to DSD (multi-month refills or pharmacy fast-track visits). Mixed effects regression was clustered by individual and facility and adjusted for outcomes during the pre-enrolment period and baseline variables that differed by arm.

Results

Between April and July 2022, 1911 AYLHIV ages 10–24 were enrolled (control: 1016, intervention: 895, 1708.8 person-years). Median age was 17, and 1512 (79.5%) were in school. Characteristics were balanced by arm, except for a higher proportion coming to the clinic alone in control arm (68.5% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.04). At intervention facilities, using the DiSC tool, 574 (64.6%) AYLHIV were assigned to DSD, 122 (13.7%) to standard care, 100 (11.3%) to mental health and retention counselling, and 92 (10.4%) to intensive case management. Missed visits were 8.5% in intervention versus 8.3% in control (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89−1.20); viral non-suppression (7.7% vs. 9.7%, aRR 0.79 95% CI: 0.54−1.16) and antiretroviral therapy adherence (92.8% vs. 94.6%, aRR 0.98 95% CI: 0.94−1.02) were similar between arms. AYLHIV in the intervention arm received more fast-track visits (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01−1.46). Intervention facilities experienced fewer scheduled appointments compared to control (aRR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91−0.98, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Overall, missed visits and non-suppression were infrequent (< 10%) and did not decrease with the DiSC intervention. The DiSC intervention resulted in increased assignment to differentiated services without increasing missed visits or viral non-suppression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信