Greta Santi Laurini, Victoria Nikitina, Nicola Montanaro, Domenico Motola
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂在儿科的安全性:基于EudraVigilance数据的研究","authors":"Greta Santi Laurini, Victoria Nikitina, Nicola Montanaro, Domenico Motola","doi":"10.1111/fcp.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Despite limited paediatric approvals, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among children has increased in recent years, and concerns have arisen about their safety, including the risk of allergies. To provide additional evidence on the paediatric safety of PPIs, we performed a study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrieved from EudraVigilance reports of suspected ADRs for PPIs in the age class 0–11 years in the period 2003–2022. Most reported ADRs and allergic conditions were evaluated by descriptive analysis. A case-non-case analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect differences in reporting rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1389 reports and 4157 suspected ADRs were analysed. Most reports involved omeprazole (46.9%) and esomeprazole (27.3%), and 75.8% concerned serious outcomes. Gastrointestinal disorders were among the most common suspected ADRs, with vomiting being the most frequently reported (2.3%). Among allergic conditions, there were six cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, five of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and four of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Statistically significant reactions for omeprazole were choking (ROR 5.54; 95% CI, 1.04–29.56) and pneumonia (3.61; 1.41–9.20), while for esomeprazole gastrointestinal disorder (7.57; 1.18–48.60) and constipation (4.74; 2.25–9.98).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Most common suspected ADRs reported with paediatric PPI use in Europe were gastrointestinal disorders, consistent with the safety profile in the product license. However, a high proportion of serious ADRs and few cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions were reported.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12657,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcp.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Paediatrics: A Study Based on EudraVigilance Data\",\"authors\":\"Greta Santi Laurini, Victoria Nikitina, Nicola Montanaro, Domenico Motola\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcp.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite limited paediatric approvals, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among children has increased in recent years, and concerns have arisen about their safety, including the risk of allergies. To provide additional evidence on the paediatric safety of PPIs, we performed a study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrieved from EudraVigilance reports of suspected ADRs for PPIs in the age class 0–11 years in the period 2003–2022. Most reported ADRs and allergic conditions were evaluated by descriptive analysis. A case-non-case analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect differences in reporting rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 1389 reports and 4157 suspected ADRs were analysed. Most reports involved omeprazole (46.9%) and esomeprazole (27.3%), and 75.8% concerned serious outcomes. Gastrointestinal disorders were among the most common suspected ADRs, with vomiting being the most frequently reported (2.3%). Among allergic conditions, there were six cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, five of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and four of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Statistically significant reactions for omeprazole were choking (ROR 5.54; 95% CI, 1.04–29.56) and pneumonia (3.61; 1.41–9.20), while for esomeprazole gastrointestinal disorder (7.57; 1.18–48.60) and constipation (4.74; 2.25–9.98).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most common suspected ADRs reported with paediatric PPI use in Europe were gastrointestinal disorders, consistent with the safety profile in the product license. However, a high proportion of serious ADRs and few cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions were reported.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcp.70036\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcp.70036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcp.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Paediatrics: A Study Based on EudraVigilance Data
Background and Objectives
Despite limited paediatric approvals, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among children has increased in recent years, and concerns have arisen about their safety, including the risk of allergies. To provide additional evidence on the paediatric safety of PPIs, we performed a study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in clinical practice.
Methods
We retrieved from EudraVigilance reports of suspected ADRs for PPIs in the age class 0–11 years in the period 2003–2022. Most reported ADRs and allergic conditions were evaluated by descriptive analysis. A case-non-case analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect differences in reporting rates.
Results
A total of 1389 reports and 4157 suspected ADRs were analysed. Most reports involved omeprazole (46.9%) and esomeprazole (27.3%), and 75.8% concerned serious outcomes. Gastrointestinal disorders were among the most common suspected ADRs, with vomiting being the most frequently reported (2.3%). Among allergic conditions, there were six cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, five of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and four of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Statistically significant reactions for omeprazole were choking (ROR 5.54; 95% CI, 1.04–29.56) and pneumonia (3.61; 1.41–9.20), while for esomeprazole gastrointestinal disorder (7.57; 1.18–48.60) and constipation (4.74; 2.25–9.98).
Conclusions
Most common suspected ADRs reported with paediatric PPI use in Europe were gastrointestinal disorders, consistent with the safety profile in the product license. However, a high proportion of serious ADRs and few cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions were reported.
期刊介绍:
Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology publishes reports describing important and novel developments in fundamental as well as clinical research relevant to drug therapy. Original articles, short communications and reviews are published on all aspects of experimental and clinical pharmacology including:
Antimicrobial, Antiviral Agents
Autonomic Pharmacology
Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Cellular Pharmacology
Clinical Trials
Endocrinopharmacology
Gene Therapy
Inflammation, Immunopharmacology
Lipids, Atherosclerosis
Liver and G-I Tract Pharmacology
Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics
Neuropharmacology
Neuropsychopharmacology
Oncopharmacology
Pediatric Pharmacology Development
Pharmacoeconomics
Pharmacoepidemiology
Pharmacogenetics, Pharmacogenomics
Pharmacovigilance
Pulmonary Pharmacology
Receptors, Signal Transduction
Renal Pharmacology
Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Toxicopharmacology
Clinical research, including clinical studies and clinical trials, may cover disciplines such as pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacogenomics and pharmacoeconomics. Basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology which contribute to an understanding of drug therapy are also welcomed.