质子泵抑制剂在儿科的安全性:基于EudraVigilance数据的研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Greta Santi Laurini, Victoria Nikitina, Nicola Montanaro, Domenico Motola
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂在儿科的安全性:基于EudraVigilance数据的研究","authors":"Greta Santi Laurini,&nbsp;Victoria Nikitina,&nbsp;Nicola Montanaro,&nbsp;Domenico Motola","doi":"10.1111/fcp.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Despite limited paediatric approvals, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among children has increased in recent years, and concerns have arisen about their safety, including the risk of allergies. To provide additional evidence on the paediatric safety of PPIs, we performed a study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrieved from EudraVigilance reports of suspected ADRs for PPIs in the age class 0–11 years in the period 2003–2022. Most reported ADRs and allergic conditions were evaluated by descriptive analysis. A case-non-case analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect differences in reporting rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1389 reports and 4157 suspected ADRs were analysed. Most reports involved omeprazole (46.9%) and esomeprazole (27.3%), and 75.8% concerned serious outcomes. Gastrointestinal disorders were among the most common suspected ADRs, with vomiting being the most frequently reported (2.3%). Among allergic conditions, there were six cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, five of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and four of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Statistically significant reactions for omeprazole were choking (ROR 5.54; 95% CI, 1.04–29.56) and pneumonia (3.61; 1.41–9.20), while for esomeprazole gastrointestinal disorder (7.57; 1.18–48.60) and constipation (4.74; 2.25–9.98).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Most common suspected ADRs reported with paediatric PPI use in Europe were gastrointestinal disorders, consistent with the safety profile in the product license. However, a high proportion of serious ADRs and few cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions were reported.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12657,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcp.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Paediatrics: A Study Based on EudraVigilance Data\",\"authors\":\"Greta Santi Laurini,&nbsp;Victoria Nikitina,&nbsp;Nicola Montanaro,&nbsp;Domenico Motola\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcp.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite limited paediatric approvals, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among children has increased in recent years, and concerns have arisen about their safety, including the risk of allergies. To provide additional evidence on the paediatric safety of PPIs, we performed a study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrieved from EudraVigilance reports of suspected ADRs for PPIs in the age class 0–11 years in the period 2003–2022. Most reported ADRs and allergic conditions were evaluated by descriptive analysis. A case-non-case analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect differences in reporting rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 1389 reports and 4157 suspected ADRs were analysed. Most reports involved omeprazole (46.9%) and esomeprazole (27.3%), and 75.8% concerned serious outcomes. Gastrointestinal disorders were among the most common suspected ADRs, with vomiting being the most frequently reported (2.3%). Among allergic conditions, there were six cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, five of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and four of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Statistically significant reactions for omeprazole were choking (ROR 5.54; 95% CI, 1.04–29.56) and pneumonia (3.61; 1.41–9.20), while for esomeprazole gastrointestinal disorder (7.57; 1.18–48.60) and constipation (4.74; 2.25–9.98).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most common suspected ADRs reported with paediatric PPI use in Europe were gastrointestinal disorders, consistent with the safety profile in the product license. However, a high proportion of serious ADRs and few cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions were reported.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcp.70036\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcp.70036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcp.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的尽管儿科批准有限,但近年来质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在儿童中的使用有所增加,人们对其安全性(包括过敏风险)的担忧也有所增加。为了提供关于PPIs的儿科安全性的额外证据,我们在临床实践中对疑似药物不良反应(adr)进行了研究。方法我们从2003-2022年0-11岁年龄段的PPIs疑似不良反应的EudraVigilance报告中检索。大多数报告的不良反应和过敏情况通过描述性分析进行评估。采用报告优势比(ROR)进行病例-非病例分析,置信区间为95%。使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验来检测报告率的差异。结果共分析报告1389份,疑似不良反应4157份。大多数报告涉及奥美拉唑(46.9%)和埃索美拉唑(27.3%),75.8%涉及严重后果。胃肠道疾病是最常见的疑似不良反应,呕吐是最常见的报告(2.3%)。其中,中毒性表皮坏死松解6例,Stevens-Johnson综合征5例,药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多及全身症状4例。奥美拉唑有统计学意义的反应是窒息(ROR 5.54;95% CI, 1.04-29.56)和肺炎(3.61;1.41-9.20),埃索美拉唑胃肠道疾病(7.57;1.18-48.60)和便秘(4.74;2.25 - -9.98)。结论:欧洲报告的儿科PPI最常见的疑似不良反应是胃肠道疾病,这与产品许可中的安全性相符。然而,严重不良反应的比例很高,严重皮肤不良反应的病例很少报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Paediatrics: A Study Based on EudraVigilance Data

Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Paediatrics: A Study Based on EudraVigilance Data

Background and Objectives

Despite limited paediatric approvals, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among children has increased in recent years, and concerns have arisen about their safety, including the risk of allergies. To provide additional evidence on the paediatric safety of PPIs, we performed a study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in clinical practice.

Methods

We retrieved from EudraVigilance reports of suspected ADRs for PPIs in the age class 0–11 years in the period 2003–2022. Most reported ADRs and allergic conditions were evaluated by descriptive analysis. A case-non-case analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect differences in reporting rates.

Results

A total of 1389 reports and 4157 suspected ADRs were analysed. Most reports involved omeprazole (46.9%) and esomeprazole (27.3%), and 75.8% concerned serious outcomes. Gastrointestinal disorders were among the most common suspected ADRs, with vomiting being the most frequently reported (2.3%). Among allergic conditions, there were six cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, five of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and four of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Statistically significant reactions for omeprazole were choking (ROR 5.54; 95% CI, 1.04–29.56) and pneumonia (3.61; 1.41–9.20), while for esomeprazole gastrointestinal disorder (7.57; 1.18–48.60) and constipation (4.74; 2.25–9.98).

Conclusions

Most common suspected ADRs reported with paediatric PPI use in Europe were gastrointestinal disorders, consistent with the safety profile in the product license. However, a high proportion of serious ADRs and few cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions were reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
111
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology publishes reports describing important and novel developments in fundamental as well as clinical research relevant to drug therapy. Original articles, short communications and reviews are published on all aspects of experimental and clinical pharmacology including: Antimicrobial, Antiviral Agents Autonomic Pharmacology Cardiovascular Pharmacology Cellular Pharmacology Clinical Trials Endocrinopharmacology Gene Therapy Inflammation, Immunopharmacology Lipids, Atherosclerosis Liver and G-I Tract Pharmacology Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics Neuropharmacology Neuropsychopharmacology Oncopharmacology Pediatric Pharmacology Development Pharmacoeconomics Pharmacoepidemiology Pharmacogenetics, Pharmacogenomics Pharmacovigilance Pulmonary Pharmacology Receptors, Signal Transduction Renal Pharmacology Thrombosis and Hemostasis Toxicopharmacology Clinical research, including clinical studies and clinical trials, may cover disciplines such as pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacogenomics and pharmacoeconomics. Basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology which contribute to an understanding of drug therapy are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信