道路交通事故黑点识别方法的应用与展望

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Changjian Zhang , Jie He , Haifeng Wang , Yuntao Ye , Xintong Yan , Chenwei Wang , Xiazhi Zhang
{"title":"道路交通事故黑点识别方法的应用与展望","authors":"Changjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie He ,&nbsp;Haifeng Wang ,&nbsp;Yuntao Ye ,&nbsp;Xintong Yan ,&nbsp;Chenwei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiazhi Zhang","doi":"10.1080/19427867.2024.2416304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blackspot identification is a global concern in road safety. The accident-based method has been widely employed over the past few decades but remains reactive, as it depends on accidents occurring and causing harm. To overcome its limitations, proactive methods based on surrogate indicators have emerged. However, apart from Traffic Conflict Technology (TCT), other surrogate indicators lack a comprehensive framework spanning from extraction to practical application, emphasizing a key priority for future research. Despite numerous proposed methods, critical evaluation of their strengths, limitations, and application contexts remains limited. Additionally, the literature often overlooks the measurement of ‘potential accident risk’ in blackspot identification. Due to the rarity and randomness of accidents, even high-risk sections may record accident counts below the threshold during observation. This paper reviews 182 studies, examining blackspot identification methods and exploring potential accident risk through surrogate indicators. It underscores the importance of integrating potential risk into identification processes and summarizes the application of these methods across countries with varying income levels. Finally, it outlines the connection between blackspot identification and accident severity analysis, offering recommendations for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48974,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research","volume":"17 6","pages":"Pages 1114-1137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the application and prospect of road accident blackspots identification approaches\",\"authors\":\"Changjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie He ,&nbsp;Haifeng Wang ,&nbsp;Yuntao Ye ,&nbsp;Xintong Yan ,&nbsp;Chenwei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiazhi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19427867.2024.2416304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Blackspot identification is a global concern in road safety. The accident-based method has been widely employed over the past few decades but remains reactive, as it depends on accidents occurring and causing harm. To overcome its limitations, proactive methods based on surrogate indicators have emerged. However, apart from Traffic Conflict Technology (TCT), other surrogate indicators lack a comprehensive framework spanning from extraction to practical application, emphasizing a key priority for future research. Despite numerous proposed methods, critical evaluation of their strengths, limitations, and application contexts remains limited. Additionally, the literature often overlooks the measurement of ‘potential accident risk’ in blackspot identification. Due to the rarity and randomness of accidents, even high-risk sections may record accident counts below the threshold during observation. This paper reviews 182 studies, examining blackspot identification methods and exploring potential accident risk through surrogate indicators. It underscores the importance of integrating potential risk into identification processes and summarizes the application of these methods across countries with varying income levels. Finally, it outlines the connection between blackspot identification and accident severity analysis, offering recommendations for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1114-1137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1942786724000857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1942786724000857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑点识别是道路安全领域的一个全球性问题。在过去的几十年里,基于事故的方法被广泛采用,但仍然是被动的,因为它取决于事故的发生和造成的伤害。为了克服其局限性,出现了基于替代指标的前瞻性方法。然而,除了交通冲突技术(TCT)之外,其他替代指标缺乏从提取到实际应用的综合框架,强调了未来研究的重点。尽管提出了许多方法,但对它们的优势、局限性和应用环境的批判性评估仍然有限。此外,文献往往忽略了黑点识别中“潜在事故风险”的测量。由于事故的罕见性和随机性,即使是高风险路段,在观察时也可能记录到低于阈值的事故数。本文回顾了182项研究,考察了黑点识别方法,并通过替代指标探讨了潜在的事故风险。报告强调了将潜在风险纳入识别过程的重要性,并总结了这些方法在不同收入水平国家的应用情况。最后,概述了黑点识别与事故严重性分析之间的联系,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of the application and prospect of road accident blackspots identification approaches
Blackspot identification is a global concern in road safety. The accident-based method has been widely employed over the past few decades but remains reactive, as it depends on accidents occurring and causing harm. To overcome its limitations, proactive methods based on surrogate indicators have emerged. However, apart from Traffic Conflict Technology (TCT), other surrogate indicators lack a comprehensive framework spanning from extraction to practical application, emphasizing a key priority for future research. Despite numerous proposed methods, critical evaluation of their strengths, limitations, and application contexts remains limited. Additionally, the literature often overlooks the measurement of ‘potential accident risk’ in blackspot identification. Due to the rarity and randomness of accidents, even high-risk sections may record accident counts below the threshold during observation. This paper reviews 182 studies, examining blackspot identification methods and exploring potential accident risk through surrogate indicators. It underscores the importance of integrating potential risk into identification processes and summarizes the application of these methods across countries with varying income levels. Finally, it outlines the connection between blackspot identification and accident severity analysis, offering recommendations for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research is a quarterly journal that publishes high-quality peer-reviewed and mini-review papers as well as technical notes and book reviews on the state-of-the-art in transportation research. The focus of Transportation Letters is on analytical and empirical findings, methodological papers, and theoretical and conceptual insights across all areas of research. Review resource papers that merge descriptions of the state-of-the-art with innovative and new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual insights spanning all areas of transportation research are invited and of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信