竞争文化会影响企业绿色创新泡沫吗?

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Guocang Yang, Mingliang Liu
{"title":"竞争文化会影响企业绿色创新泡沫吗?","authors":"Guocang Yang,&nbsp;Mingliang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms spanning 2009–2023, this study examines the interactions between competitive culture, financial mismatch, managerial myopia, executive green innovation, and corporate green innovation bubbles. Using a multi-stage analytical framework, we conduct baseline regressions with fixed effects to establish core relationships, followed by mediation tests and moderated regression analysis. Alternative estimators and subsample analyses confirm robustness, and stratified interaction models explore heterogeneity. Findings indicate that a hypercompetitive culture intensifies green innovation bubbles via the mechanism of financial mismatch. Managerial myopia significantly enhances the competitive culture–green innovation bubble interaction, while executive green perception weakens this relationship. Furthermore, competitive culture has a greater positive impact on green innovation bubbles in small firms, firms without environmental penalties, and pollution-intensive enterprises. These results emphasize three critical pathways. For policymakers, this study demands recalibrating antitrust frameworks to monitor green innovation. For corporations, this study underscores executive green literacy training to counteract myopic pressures. For researchers, this study pioneers a behavioral–finance–sustainability nexus model, thus advancing green finance theory beyond traditional efficient-market paradigms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 107891"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can competitive culture affect corporate green innovation bubbles?\",\"authors\":\"Guocang Yang,&nbsp;Mingliang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms spanning 2009–2023, this study examines the interactions between competitive culture, financial mismatch, managerial myopia, executive green innovation, and corporate green innovation bubbles. Using a multi-stage analytical framework, we conduct baseline regressions with fixed effects to establish core relationships, followed by mediation tests and moderated regression analysis. Alternative estimators and subsample analyses confirm robustness, and stratified interaction models explore heterogeneity. Findings indicate that a hypercompetitive culture intensifies green innovation bubbles via the mechanism of financial mismatch. Managerial myopia significantly enhances the competitive culture–green innovation bubble interaction, while executive green perception weakens this relationship. Furthermore, competitive culture has a greater positive impact on green innovation bubbles in small firms, firms without environmental penalties, and pollution-intensive enterprises. These results emphasize three critical pathways. For policymakers, this study demands recalibrating antitrust frameworks to monitor green innovation. For corporations, this study underscores executive green literacy training to counteract myopic pressures. For researchers, this study pioneers a behavioral–finance–sustainability nexus model, thus advancing green finance theory beyond traditional efficient-market paradigms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325011493\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325011493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用2009-2023年中国a股上市公司的数据,研究了竞争文化、财务错配、管理短视、高管绿色创新和企业绿色创新泡沫之间的相互作用。使用多阶段分析框架,我们进行了具有固定效应的基线回归来建立核心关系,随后进行了中介检验和有调节回归分析。替代估计和子样本分析证实了稳健性,分层相互作用模型探索了异质性。研究结果表明,超竞争文化通过金融错配机制加剧了绿色创新泡沫。管理者的短视显著增强了竞争文化与绿色创新泡沫的互动关系,而管理者的绿色感知则削弱了这种关系。此外,竞争文化对小型企业、无环境处罚企业和污染密集型企业的绿色创新泡沫有更大的正向影响。这些结果强调了三个关键途径。对于政策制定者来说,这项研究要求重新调整反垄断框架,以监控绿色创新。对于企业来说,这项研究强调对高管进行绿色素养培训,以抵消短视压力。对于研究者而言,本研究开创了行为-金融-可持续性联系模型,从而推动了绿色金融理论超越传统的有效市场范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can competitive culture affect corporate green innovation bubbles?
Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms spanning 2009–2023, this study examines the interactions between competitive culture, financial mismatch, managerial myopia, executive green innovation, and corporate green innovation bubbles. Using a multi-stage analytical framework, we conduct baseline regressions with fixed effects to establish core relationships, followed by mediation tests and moderated regression analysis. Alternative estimators and subsample analyses confirm robustness, and stratified interaction models explore heterogeneity. Findings indicate that a hypercompetitive culture intensifies green innovation bubbles via the mechanism of financial mismatch. Managerial myopia significantly enhances the competitive culture–green innovation bubble interaction, while executive green perception weakens this relationship. Furthermore, competitive culture has a greater positive impact on green innovation bubbles in small firms, firms without environmental penalties, and pollution-intensive enterprises. These results emphasize three critical pathways. For policymakers, this study demands recalibrating antitrust frameworks to monitor green innovation. For corporations, this study underscores executive green literacy training to counteract myopic pressures. For researchers, this study pioneers a behavioral–finance–sustainability nexus model, thus advancing green finance theory beyond traditional efficient-market paradigms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信