{"title":"竞争文化会影响企业绿色创新泡沫吗?","authors":"Guocang Yang, Mingliang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms spanning 2009–2023, this study examines the interactions between competitive culture, financial mismatch, managerial myopia, executive green innovation, and corporate green innovation bubbles. Using a multi-stage analytical framework, we conduct baseline regressions with fixed effects to establish core relationships, followed by mediation tests and moderated regression analysis. Alternative estimators and subsample analyses confirm robustness, and stratified interaction models explore heterogeneity. Findings indicate that a hypercompetitive culture intensifies green innovation bubbles via the mechanism of financial mismatch. Managerial myopia significantly enhances the competitive culture–green innovation bubble interaction, while executive green perception weakens this relationship. Furthermore, competitive culture has a greater positive impact on green innovation bubbles in small firms, firms without environmental penalties, and pollution-intensive enterprises. These results emphasize three critical pathways. For policymakers, this study demands recalibrating antitrust frameworks to monitor green innovation. For corporations, this study underscores executive green literacy training to counteract myopic pressures. For researchers, this study pioneers a behavioral–finance–sustainability nexus model, thus advancing green finance theory beyond traditional efficient-market paradigms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 107891"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can competitive culture affect corporate green innovation bubbles?\",\"authors\":\"Guocang Yang, Mingliang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms spanning 2009–2023, this study examines the interactions between competitive culture, financial mismatch, managerial myopia, executive green innovation, and corporate green innovation bubbles. Using a multi-stage analytical framework, we conduct baseline regressions with fixed effects to establish core relationships, followed by mediation tests and moderated regression analysis. Alternative estimators and subsample analyses confirm robustness, and stratified interaction models explore heterogeneity. Findings indicate that a hypercompetitive culture intensifies green innovation bubbles via the mechanism of financial mismatch. Managerial myopia significantly enhances the competitive culture–green innovation bubble interaction, while executive green perception weakens this relationship. Furthermore, competitive culture has a greater positive impact on green innovation bubbles in small firms, firms without environmental penalties, and pollution-intensive enterprises. These results emphasize three critical pathways. For policymakers, this study demands recalibrating antitrust frameworks to monitor green innovation. For corporations, this study underscores executive green literacy training to counteract myopic pressures. For researchers, this study pioneers a behavioral–finance–sustainability nexus model, thus advancing green finance theory beyond traditional efficient-market paradigms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325011493\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325011493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can competitive culture affect corporate green innovation bubbles?
Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms spanning 2009–2023, this study examines the interactions between competitive culture, financial mismatch, managerial myopia, executive green innovation, and corporate green innovation bubbles. Using a multi-stage analytical framework, we conduct baseline regressions with fixed effects to establish core relationships, followed by mediation tests and moderated regression analysis. Alternative estimators and subsample analyses confirm robustness, and stratified interaction models explore heterogeneity. Findings indicate that a hypercompetitive culture intensifies green innovation bubbles via the mechanism of financial mismatch. Managerial myopia significantly enhances the competitive culture–green innovation bubble interaction, while executive green perception weakens this relationship. Furthermore, competitive culture has a greater positive impact on green innovation bubbles in small firms, firms without environmental penalties, and pollution-intensive enterprises. These results emphasize three critical pathways. For policymakers, this study demands recalibrating antitrust frameworks to monitor green innovation. For corporations, this study underscores executive green literacy training to counteract myopic pressures. For researchers, this study pioneers a behavioral–finance–sustainability nexus model, thus advancing green finance theory beyond traditional efficient-market paradigms.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance