Hong Jiang , Haiying Li , Shuwen Yu , Changhong Peng
{"title":"基于AM-SIS-ANN方法的IRIS被动EHRS可靠性评估","authors":"Hong Jiang , Haiying Li , Shuwen Yu , Changhong Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on the reliability estimation of passive systems in nuclear power plants has been pivotal to ensuring nuclear power generation safety. Numerous analytical methods have been proposed to calculate the failure probability of passive systems, with the most notable ones combining fast computational surrogate models with efficient variance reduction sampling techniques. Nevertheless, these methods are predominantly based on deterministic failure criteria, posing a significant challenge in managing the uncertainty of such criteria. To address this problem and enhance the accuracy and efficiency of passive system reliability estimation, this paper introduces a segmented method that integrates Adaptive Metamodel Subset Simulation Importance Sampling (AM-SIS) with neural networks, abbreviated as AM-SIS-ANN. This method harnesses the strengths of both techniques: employing the AM-SIS method to calculate failure probabilities in low-probability regions to mitigate high prediction errors from neural networks in sparse data areas, and using neural networks to compute output distributions in other regions, thereby eliminating the need for additional AM-SIS executions and substantially reducing computation time. The proposed method’s effectiveness is illustrated and validated through two numerical examples. Finally, this method is applied to calculate the failure probability of the Emergency Heat Removal System (EHRS) of the IRIS reactor. For the natural circulation loop example, considering four failure criteria, the AM-SIS-ANN method achieved the shortest computation time, reducing it by approximately 23.4% compared to the AM-SIS method and by about 57.5% compared to the neural network method. These results demonstrate that the AM-SIS-ANN method, under uncertain failure criteria, can significantly reduce computational time while ensuring high accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 111707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability assessment of passive EHRS of IRIS based on the AM-SIS-ANN method\",\"authors\":\"Hong Jiang , Haiying Li , Shuwen Yu , Changhong Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research on the reliability estimation of passive systems in nuclear power plants has been pivotal to ensuring nuclear power generation safety. Numerous analytical methods have been proposed to calculate the failure probability of passive systems, with the most notable ones combining fast computational surrogate models with efficient variance reduction sampling techniques. Nevertheless, these methods are predominantly based on deterministic failure criteria, posing a significant challenge in managing the uncertainty of such criteria. To address this problem and enhance the accuracy and efficiency of passive system reliability estimation, this paper introduces a segmented method that integrates Adaptive Metamodel Subset Simulation Importance Sampling (AM-SIS) with neural networks, abbreviated as AM-SIS-ANN. This method harnesses the strengths of both techniques: employing the AM-SIS method to calculate failure probabilities in low-probability regions to mitigate high prediction errors from neural networks in sparse data areas, and using neural networks to compute output distributions in other regions, thereby eliminating the need for additional AM-SIS executions and substantially reducing computation time. The proposed method’s effectiveness is illustrated and validated through two numerical examples. Finally, this method is applied to calculate the failure probability of the Emergency Heat Removal System (EHRS) of the IRIS reactor. For the natural circulation loop example, considering four failure criteria, the AM-SIS-ANN method achieved the shortest computation time, reducing it by approximately 23.4% compared to the AM-SIS method and by about 57.5% compared to the neural network method. These results demonstrate that the AM-SIS-ANN method, under uncertain failure criteria, can significantly reduce computational time while ensuring high accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925005249\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925005249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability assessment of passive EHRS of IRIS based on the AM-SIS-ANN method
Research on the reliability estimation of passive systems in nuclear power plants has been pivotal to ensuring nuclear power generation safety. Numerous analytical methods have been proposed to calculate the failure probability of passive systems, with the most notable ones combining fast computational surrogate models with efficient variance reduction sampling techniques. Nevertheless, these methods are predominantly based on deterministic failure criteria, posing a significant challenge in managing the uncertainty of such criteria. To address this problem and enhance the accuracy and efficiency of passive system reliability estimation, this paper introduces a segmented method that integrates Adaptive Metamodel Subset Simulation Importance Sampling (AM-SIS) with neural networks, abbreviated as AM-SIS-ANN. This method harnesses the strengths of both techniques: employing the AM-SIS method to calculate failure probabilities in low-probability regions to mitigate high prediction errors from neural networks in sparse data areas, and using neural networks to compute output distributions in other regions, thereby eliminating the need for additional AM-SIS executions and substantially reducing computation time. The proposed method’s effectiveness is illustrated and validated through two numerical examples. Finally, this method is applied to calculate the failure probability of the Emergency Heat Removal System (EHRS) of the IRIS reactor. For the natural circulation loop example, considering four failure criteria, the AM-SIS-ANN method achieved the shortest computation time, reducing it by approximately 23.4% compared to the AM-SIS method and by about 57.5% compared to the neural network method. These results demonstrate that the AM-SIS-ANN method, under uncertain failure criteria, can significantly reduce computational time while ensuring high accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.