Matthew Aludino, Jasmine Stinson, Mark Bounthavong, Jennifer Namba, Trina Huynh, Andrew Willeford
{"title":"混合型心力衰竭临床模型对指导药物治疗优化的影响","authors":"Matthew Aludino, Jasmine Stinson, Mark Bounthavong, Jennifer Namba, Trina Huynh, Andrew Willeford","doi":"10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure may be challenging due to limited clinical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists in optimizing GDMT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with an ejection fraction < 50% seen in a hybrid clinic model that included multidisciplinary in-person visits and pharmacist-led telehealth appointments (hybrid) to an in-person model that included only a cardiology provider (historical). The primary end point was the number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient. An exploratory end point included a modified optimal medical therapy score (mOMT). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the hybrid cohort (n = 52) increased from 2.5 to 3.1 GDMT at 3 months compared to 2.5 to 2.8 in the historical cohort (n = 46). There was a significantly greater increase in the average number of GDMT at each time interval in the hybrid cohort compared to the historical cohort (difference in changes per interval = +0.13; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.21). More patients were on quadruple therapy at the last study visit (48.1% vs 26.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.025), and the increase in mOMT was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (difference in changes = +0.036; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.056).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The hybrid model involving pharmacists was associated with greater initiation of GDMT compared to in-person care without a pharmacist. This study confirms the valuable role of pharmacists in optimizing therapy for patients with heart failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100737,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of a hybrid heart failure clinic model on optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Aludino, Jasmine Stinson, Mark Bounthavong, Jennifer Namba, Trina Huynh, Andrew Willeford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure may be challenging due to limited clinical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists in optimizing GDMT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with an ejection fraction < 50% seen in a hybrid clinic model that included multidisciplinary in-person visits and pharmacist-led telehealth appointments (hybrid) to an in-person model that included only a cardiology provider (historical). The primary end point was the number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient. An exploratory end point included a modified optimal medical therapy score (mOMT). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the hybrid cohort (n = 52) increased from 2.5 to 3.1 GDMT at 3 months compared to 2.5 to 2.8 in the historical cohort (n = 46). There was a significantly greater increase in the average number of GDMT at each time interval in the hybrid cohort compared to the historical cohort (difference in changes per interval = +0.13; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.21). More patients were on quadruple therapy at the last study visit (48.1% vs 26.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.025), and the increase in mOMT was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (difference in changes = +0.036; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.056).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The hybrid model involving pharmacists was associated with greater initiation of GDMT compared to in-person care without a pharmacist. This study confirms the valuable role of pharmacists in optimizing therapy for patients with heart failure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAPhA Practice Innovations\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAPhA Practice Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949969025000314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949969025000314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于有限的临床资源,实现心衰患者指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)的快速滴定可能具有挑战性。目的评价药师主导的混合临床模式在优化GDMT中的效果。方法采用单中心回顾性分析,比较患者的射血分数<;50%的人在包括多学科面对面就诊和药剂师主导的远程医疗预约的混合诊所模式(混合)到仅包括心脏病学提供者的面对面模式(历史)。主要终点是每位患者服用GDMT药物的数量。探索性终点包括改良的最佳药物治疗评分(mOMT)。结果分析使用线性混合效应模型调整基线特征。结果混合队列(n = 52)的患者在3个月时从2.5增加到3.1 GDMT,而历史队列(n = 46)的患者从2.5增加到2.8。与历史队列相比,杂交队列在每个时间间隔的平均GDMT数量显著增加(每个时间间隔的变化差异= +0.13;95% ci: 0.05, 0.21)。在最后一次研究访问时,更多的患者接受了四联治疗(48.1% vs 26.1%, P = 0.025),混合队列中mOMT的增加明显更高(变化差异= +0.036;95% ci: 0.015, 0.056)。结论与没有药师的现场护理相比,有药师参与的混合模式与更大的GDMT启动相关。本研究证实了药师在优化心力衰竭患者治疗中的重要作用。
Outcomes of a hybrid heart failure clinic model on optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy
Background
Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure may be challenging due to limited clinical resources.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists in optimizing GDMT.
Methods
A single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with an ejection fraction < 50% seen in a hybrid clinic model that included multidisciplinary in-person visits and pharmacist-led telehealth appointments (hybrid) to an in-person model that included only a cardiology provider (historical). The primary end point was the number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient. An exploratory end point included a modified optimal medical therapy score (mOMT). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline characteristics.
Results
Patients in the hybrid cohort (n = 52) increased from 2.5 to 3.1 GDMT at 3 months compared to 2.5 to 2.8 in the historical cohort (n = 46). There was a significantly greater increase in the average number of GDMT at each time interval in the hybrid cohort compared to the historical cohort (difference in changes per interval = +0.13; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.21). More patients were on quadruple therapy at the last study visit (48.1% vs 26.1%, P = 0.025), and the increase in mOMT was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (difference in changes = +0.036; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.056).
Conclusions
The hybrid model involving pharmacists was associated with greater initiation of GDMT compared to in-person care without a pharmacist. This study confirms the valuable role of pharmacists in optimizing therapy for patients with heart failure.