Emily B Parker, Suhas Rao Velichala, Varun Nukala, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Gregory R Waryasz, Jeremy T Smith, Daniel Guss, Christopher P Chiodo, Christopher W DiGiovanni, David N Bernstein
{"title":"外科医生的偏好,手术位置和修复时间驱动跟腱断裂修复成本。","authors":"Emily B Parker, Suhas Rao Velichala, Varun Nukala, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Gregory R Waryasz, Jeremy T Smith, Daniel Guss, Christopher P Chiodo, Christopher W DiGiovanni, David N Bernstein","doi":"10.1177/10711007251347278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Midsubstance Achilles tendon repair is a common procedure, yet the factors influencing its cost have been underexamined and often imprecisely understood. Using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), we examined variation in total cost, compared patient-, surgeon-, and surgery-specific characteristics between high- and non-high-cost repairs, and assessed factors associated with total cost to identify specific cost drivers that might reduce expenses without compromising clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture repair between January 3, 2022 and December 28, 2023 at 2 academic medical centers and their affiliated community hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers were identified. Exclusion criteria included revision procedures and those with concurrent procedures besides fasciotomy. TDABC methodology was used to determine total cost across 3 clinical phases: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Cost was normalized per institution requirements. Bivariate analysis was performed across all characteristics between high-cost (top decile) procedures and all others. Spearman correlation between operative time and total cost was assessed. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify key cost drivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 341 primary midsubstance Achilles rupture repairs performed by 8 surgeons, the most expensive procedure was 6 times costlier than the least expensive one. Eighty-five percent of the cost, on average, was incurred intraoperatively. A \"good\" correlation was found between operative time and total cost (<i>P</i> < .05). When accounting for covariates, increasing time between rupture and repair was associated with higher cost (<i>P</i> < .05). Surgical location, surgical approach, and repair suture were also associated with total cost (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial variability in the cost of primary midsubstance Achilles rupture repair is driven by factors including timing of surgical repair, intraoperative surgeon-specific characteristics (ie, surgical approach and suture choice), and surgical location. Further standardization of treatment approach and decreasing time to the operating room could lower cost variability and improve the value of care for patients with midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture undergoing surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"1039-1048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgeon Preferences, Surgical Location, and Timing of Repair Drive Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair Cost.\",\"authors\":\"Emily B Parker, Suhas Rao Velichala, Varun Nukala, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Gregory R Waryasz, Jeremy T Smith, Daniel Guss, Christopher P Chiodo, Christopher W DiGiovanni, David N Bernstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251347278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Midsubstance Achilles tendon repair is a common procedure, yet the factors influencing its cost have been underexamined and often imprecisely understood. Using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), we examined variation in total cost, compared patient-, surgeon-, and surgery-specific characteristics between high- and non-high-cost repairs, and assessed factors associated with total cost to identify specific cost drivers that might reduce expenses without compromising clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture repair between January 3, 2022 and December 28, 2023 at 2 academic medical centers and their affiliated community hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers were identified. Exclusion criteria included revision procedures and those with concurrent procedures besides fasciotomy. TDABC methodology was used to determine total cost across 3 clinical phases: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Cost was normalized per institution requirements. Bivariate analysis was performed across all characteristics between high-cost (top decile) procedures and all others. Spearman correlation between operative time and total cost was assessed. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify key cost drivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 341 primary midsubstance Achilles rupture repairs performed by 8 surgeons, the most expensive procedure was 6 times costlier than the least expensive one. Eighty-five percent of the cost, on average, was incurred intraoperatively. A \\\"good\\\" correlation was found between operative time and total cost (<i>P</i> < .05). When accounting for covariates, increasing time between rupture and repair was associated with higher cost (<i>P</i> < .05). Surgical location, surgical approach, and repair suture were also associated with total cost (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial variability in the cost of primary midsubstance Achilles rupture repair is driven by factors including timing of surgical repair, intraoperative surgeon-specific characteristics (ie, surgical approach and suture choice), and surgical location. Further standardization of treatment approach and decreasing time to the operating room could lower cost variability and improve the value of care for patients with midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture undergoing surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1039-1048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251347278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251347278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:中物质跟腱修复是一种常见的手术,但影响其成本的因素尚未得到充分的研究,而且往往是不准确的理解。使用时间驱动的作业成本法(TDABC),我们检查了总成本的变化,比较了患者、外科医生和手术在高成本和非高成本修复之间的特定特征,并评估了与总成本相关的因素,以确定可能在不影响临床结果的情况下降低费用的特定成本驱动因素。方法:选取2022年1月3日至2023年12月28日在2家学术医疗中心及其附属社区医院和门诊外科中心行中质跟腱断裂修复术的患者。排除标准包括翻修手术和除筋膜切开术外并发手术。TDABC方法用于确定三个临床阶段的总成本:术前、术中和术后。成本按机构要求标准化。在高成本(前十分位数)手术和所有其他手术之间的所有特征进行双变量分析。评估手术时间与总费用的Spearman相关性。使用多变量线性回归来确定关键的成本驱动因素。结果:在8位外科医生的341例跟腱中间物质断裂修补术中,最昂贵的手术费用是最便宜的手术费用的6倍。平均85%的费用发生在术中。手术时间与总成本之间存在“良好”的相关性(P P P)结论:初级跟腱中间物质断裂修复成本的实质性变化是由手术修复时间、术中外科特异性特征(即手术入路和缝线的选择)和手术位置等因素驱动的。进一步规范治疗方法,减少到手术室的时间,可以降低成本的可变性,提高中质性跟腱断裂手术患者的护理价值。
Surgeon Preferences, Surgical Location, and Timing of Repair Drive Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair Cost.
Background: Midsubstance Achilles tendon repair is a common procedure, yet the factors influencing its cost have been underexamined and often imprecisely understood. Using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), we examined variation in total cost, compared patient-, surgeon-, and surgery-specific characteristics between high- and non-high-cost repairs, and assessed factors associated with total cost to identify specific cost drivers that might reduce expenses without compromising clinical outcomes.
Methods: Patients undergoing midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture repair between January 3, 2022 and December 28, 2023 at 2 academic medical centers and their affiliated community hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers were identified. Exclusion criteria included revision procedures and those with concurrent procedures besides fasciotomy. TDABC methodology was used to determine total cost across 3 clinical phases: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Cost was normalized per institution requirements. Bivariate analysis was performed across all characteristics between high-cost (top decile) procedures and all others. Spearman correlation between operative time and total cost was assessed. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify key cost drivers.
Results: Among 341 primary midsubstance Achilles rupture repairs performed by 8 surgeons, the most expensive procedure was 6 times costlier than the least expensive one. Eighty-five percent of the cost, on average, was incurred intraoperatively. A "good" correlation was found between operative time and total cost (P < .05). When accounting for covariates, increasing time between rupture and repair was associated with higher cost (P < .05). Surgical location, surgical approach, and repair suture were also associated with total cost (P < .05).
Conclusion: Substantial variability in the cost of primary midsubstance Achilles rupture repair is driven by factors including timing of surgical repair, intraoperative surgeon-specific characteristics (ie, surgical approach and suture choice), and surgical location. Further standardization of treatment approach and decreasing time to the operating room could lower cost variability and improve the value of care for patients with midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture undergoing surgery.