向慢性缺血性心脏病患者提供体育活动建议的经验、看法和态度:德国全科医生的定性研究

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Alicia Prinz, Sabrina Hoppe, Verena Leve, Rik Crutzen, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Stefan Wilm, Sabrina Kastaun
{"title":"向慢性缺血性心脏病患者提供体育活动建议的经验、看法和态度:德国全科医生的定性研究","authors":"Alicia Prinz, Sabrina Hoppe, Verena Leve, Rik Crutzen, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Stefan Wilm, Sabrina Kastaun","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2024-003124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The WHO emphasises the importance of integrating advice on physical activity (PA) into primary care of patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Similarly, the German treatment guideline 'Chronic Coronary Heart Disease' recommends that general practitioners (GPs) provide advice on PA to IHD patients. However, the provision of PA advice seems to be inadequately implemented in general practice. One reason is the lack of medical training in providing PA advice effectively and efficiently. International guidelines recommend such training for health professionals. This study aims to explore experiences, perceptions and attitudes, including barriers and facilitators of GPs towards the routine delivery of PA advice to IHD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and June 2023, 12 face-to-face problem-centred interviews and six focus group discussions (n=37) with GPs were conducted. Interview and discussion guides were developed and pilot tested by the multi-professional study team. We used a purposive sampling strategy, and data were collected in an iterative process. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a content structuring procedure (deductive and inductive approach). GPs were involved throughout the entire research process, for example, in multi-professional analysis groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although GPs are mostly aware of the health benefits of PA for patients with IHD, PA advice is not routinely provided. Conversations on PA tend to be rather unstructured, and advice is often addressed more generally than customised to the patients' needs and preferences. Priority is given to other lifestyle issues, such as smoking cessation. PA advice is perceived as time-consuming and rather ineffective with regard to the target behaviour. GPs frequently express frustration in this context. GPs express a lack of and simultaneously a need for communication strategies (structure and tools) that can be integrated into everyday GP practice to motivate patients to PA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide relevant insights into the current practice of GPs with regard to their attitudes on, experiences with, and requirements for the provision of PA advice to IHD patients. These results are helpful to inform the development of appropriate GP training in the provision of very brief PA advice to IHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences, perceptions and attitudes on providing advice on physical activity to patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease: a qualitative study in general practitioners in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Prinz, Sabrina Hoppe, Verena Leve, Rik Crutzen, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Stefan Wilm, Sabrina Kastaun\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/fmch-2024-003124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The WHO emphasises the importance of integrating advice on physical activity (PA) into primary care of patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Similarly, the German treatment guideline 'Chronic Coronary Heart Disease' recommends that general practitioners (GPs) provide advice on PA to IHD patients. However, the provision of PA advice seems to be inadequately implemented in general practice. One reason is the lack of medical training in providing PA advice effectively and efficiently. International guidelines recommend such training for health professionals. This study aims to explore experiences, perceptions and attitudes, including barriers and facilitators of GPs towards the routine delivery of PA advice to IHD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and June 2023, 12 face-to-face problem-centred interviews and six focus group discussions (n=37) with GPs were conducted. Interview and discussion guides were developed and pilot tested by the multi-professional study team. We used a purposive sampling strategy, and data were collected in an iterative process. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a content structuring procedure (deductive and inductive approach). GPs were involved throughout the entire research process, for example, in multi-professional analysis groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although GPs are mostly aware of the health benefits of PA for patients with IHD, PA advice is not routinely provided. Conversations on PA tend to be rather unstructured, and advice is often addressed more generally than customised to the patients' needs and preferences. Priority is given to other lifestyle issues, such as smoking cessation. PA advice is perceived as time-consuming and rather ineffective with regard to the target behaviour. GPs frequently express frustration in this context. GPs express a lack of and simultaneously a need for communication strategies (structure and tools) that can be integrated into everyday GP practice to motivate patients to PA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide relevant insights into the current practice of GPs with regard to their attitudes on, experiences with, and requirements for the provision of PA advice to IHD patients. These results are helpful to inform the development of appropriate GP training in the provision of very brief PA advice to IHD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2024-003124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2024-003124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:世界卫生组织强调将身体活动(PA)建议纳入慢性缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者的初级保健的重要性。类似地,德国治疗指南“慢性冠心病”建议全科医生(gp)为IHD患者提供PA建议。然而,在一般实践中,PA建议的提供似乎没有得到充分的实施。其中一个原因是缺乏有效和高效地提供私人助理咨询的医学培训。国际准则建议对卫生专业人员进行这种培训。本研究旨在探讨全科医生对IHD患者常规提供PA建议的经验、看法和态度,包括障碍和促进因素。方法:于2023年3月至6月与全科医生进行了12次面对面的问题中心访谈和6次焦点小组讨论(n=37)。访谈和讨论指南是由多专业的研究小组开发和试点测试的。我们采用了有目的的抽样策略,并在迭代过程中收集数据。录音记录的数据逐字转录并使用内容结构化程序(演绎和归纳方法)进行分析。全科医生参与了整个研究过程,例如,在多专业分析小组中。结果:尽管全科医生大多意识到PA对IHD患者的健康益处,但PA建议并未常规提供。关于私人助理的谈话往往是非结构化的,建议往往更笼统,而不是根据患者的需求和偏好定制。优先考虑的是其他生活方式问题,比如戒烟。私人助理的建议被认为是耗时和相当无效的关于目标行为。在这种情况下,全科医生经常表示沮丧。全科医生表示缺乏沟通策略(结构和工具),同时也需要沟通策略(结构和工具),这些策略可以整合到日常的全科医生实践中,以激励患者接受PA。结论:本研究结果为当前全科医生对向IHD患者提供PA建议的态度、经验和要求提供了相关的见解。这些结果有助于发展适当的全科医生培训,为IHD患者提供非常简短的PA建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences, perceptions and attitudes on providing advice on physical activity to patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease: a qualitative study in general practitioners in Germany.

Background and objective: The WHO emphasises the importance of integrating advice on physical activity (PA) into primary care of patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Similarly, the German treatment guideline 'Chronic Coronary Heart Disease' recommends that general practitioners (GPs) provide advice on PA to IHD patients. However, the provision of PA advice seems to be inadequately implemented in general practice. One reason is the lack of medical training in providing PA advice effectively and efficiently. International guidelines recommend such training for health professionals. This study aims to explore experiences, perceptions and attitudes, including barriers and facilitators of GPs towards the routine delivery of PA advice to IHD patients.

Methods: Between March and June 2023, 12 face-to-face problem-centred interviews and six focus group discussions (n=37) with GPs were conducted. Interview and discussion guides were developed and pilot tested by the multi-professional study team. We used a purposive sampling strategy, and data were collected in an iterative process. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a content structuring procedure (deductive and inductive approach). GPs were involved throughout the entire research process, for example, in multi-professional analysis groups.

Results: Although GPs are mostly aware of the health benefits of PA for patients with IHD, PA advice is not routinely provided. Conversations on PA tend to be rather unstructured, and advice is often addressed more generally than customised to the patients' needs and preferences. Priority is given to other lifestyle issues, such as smoking cessation. PA advice is perceived as time-consuming and rather ineffective with regard to the target behaviour. GPs frequently express frustration in this context. GPs express a lack of and simultaneously a need for communication strategies (structure and tools) that can be integrated into everyday GP practice to motivate patients to PA.

Conclusion: The results provide relevant insights into the current practice of GPs with regard to their attitudes on, experiences with, and requirements for the provision of PA advice to IHD patients. These results are helpful to inform the development of appropriate GP training in the provision of very brief PA advice to IHD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信