美国频繁发作和癫痫相关急诊科就诊:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI:10.1111/epi.18525
Brad K Kamitaki, Jennifer E Geller, Jennifer H Dai, Uma Sarwadnya, Leila Alidoost, Harrison Clement, Kylie Getz, Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins, Haiqun Lin, Joel C Cantor, Hyunmi Choi
{"title":"美国频繁发作和癫痫相关急诊科就诊:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Brad K Kamitaki, Jennifer E Geller, Jennifer H Dai, Uma Sarwadnya, Leila Alidoost, Harrison Clement, Kylie Getz, Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins, Haiqun Lin, Joel C Cantor, Hyunmi Choi","doi":"10.1111/epi.18525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health disparities impact access to epilepsy care in the United States, but how these factors contribute to recurrent emergency department (ED) visits is unclear. We hypothesized that people who (1) were uninsured or had public health insurance, (2) belonged to minoritized racial/ethnic groups, or (3) resided in low-income zip codes were more likely to have frequent ED visits for seizure or epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients presenting to the ED in four U.S. states (Florida, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin) with a primary diagnosis of seizure or epilepsy. We tracked ED visits for each patient longitudinally between 2016 and 2018. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluating the association of the above factors with a high (>2) vs low (1-2) number of ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 200 962 patients who visited the ED for seizure/epilepsy, of whom 28 598 (14.7%) presented 2 times during the study period. Compared to private insurance, individuals with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-1.99), Medicaid (aOR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.93-2.09), or no insurance (aOR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.48-1.62) had increased odds of high ED visits. Black patients had a 60% higher odds of frequent ED visits compared with White patients (aOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.55-1.65). However, these disparities were attenuated for Black patients with Medicare and Medicaid, vs private insurance. High ED use was not seen in other racial/ethnic groups. Finally, patients living in low-income zip codes (0-25th percentile of median household income; aOR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.58-1.73) were more likely to be in the high ED visit group, compared with the highest income quartile.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequities likely contribute to frequent ED visits for seizures, as evidenced by our findings from four U.S. states. Effective, multi-level interventions are needed to reduce disparities for those most affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequent seizure and epilepsy-related emergency department visits in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Brad K Kamitaki, Jennifer E Geller, Jennifer H Dai, Uma Sarwadnya, Leila Alidoost, Harrison Clement, Kylie Getz, Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins, Haiqun Lin, Joel C Cantor, Hyunmi Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health disparities impact access to epilepsy care in the United States, but how these factors contribute to recurrent emergency department (ED) visits is unclear. We hypothesized that people who (1) were uninsured or had public health insurance, (2) belonged to minoritized racial/ethnic groups, or (3) resided in low-income zip codes were more likely to have frequent ED visits for seizure or epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients presenting to the ED in four U.S. states (Florida, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin) with a primary diagnosis of seizure or epilepsy. We tracked ED visits for each patient longitudinally between 2016 and 2018. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluating the association of the above factors with a high (>2) vs low (1-2) number of ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 200 962 patients who visited the ED for seizure/epilepsy, of whom 28 598 (14.7%) presented 2 times during the study period. Compared to private insurance, individuals with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-1.99), Medicaid (aOR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.93-2.09), or no insurance (aOR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.48-1.62) had increased odds of high ED visits. Black patients had a 60% higher odds of frequent ED visits compared with White patients (aOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.55-1.65). However, these disparities were attenuated for Black patients with Medicare and Medicaid, vs private insurance. High ED use was not seen in other racial/ethnic groups. Finally, patients living in low-income zip codes (0-25th percentile of median household income; aOR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.58-1.73) were more likely to be in the high ED visit group, compared with the highest income quartile.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequities likely contribute to frequent ED visits for seizures, as evidenced by our findings from four U.S. states. Effective, multi-level interventions are needed to reduce disparities for those most affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18525\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:健康差异影响美国癫痫治疗的可及性,但这些因素如何导致急诊科(ED)反复就诊尚不清楚。我们假设:(1)没有保险或有公共健康保险的人,(2)属于少数种族/民族群体,或(3)居住在低收入邮政编码地区的人更有可能因癫痫发作或癫痫而频繁到急诊室就诊。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在美国四个州(佛罗里达、马里兰、纽约和威斯康辛)以癫痫发作或癫痫为初步诊断就诊于急诊科的成年患者。我们在2016年至2018年期间对每位患者的急诊科就诊进行了纵向追踪。我们进行了多变量logistic回归分析,以评估上述因素与高(bbbb2) vs低(1-2)ED就诊次数的关系。结果:我们确定了200962例因癫痫发作/癫痫而到急诊科就诊的患者,其中28598例(14.7%)在研究期间出现了2次。与私人保险相比,有医疗保险(调整优势比[aOR] 1.90, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.82-1.99)、医疗补助(aOR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.93-2.09)或无保险(aOR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.48-1.62)的个体出现高ED就诊的几率增加。与白人患者相比,黑人患者频繁急诊科就诊的几率高出60% (aOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.55-1.65)。然而,与私人保险相比,这些差异在拥有医疗保险和医疗补助的黑人患者中有所减弱。在其他种族/族裔群体中未见高ED使用。最后,居住在低收入邮政编码地区的患者(家庭收入中位数0-25百分位数;(or 1.65, 95% CI: 1.58-1.73)与收入最高的四分位数相比,更有可能出现在高ED就诊组。意义:种族/民族和社会经济不平等可能导致癫痫发作频繁的急诊科就诊,我们在美国四个州的研究结果证明了这一点。需要采取有效的多层次干预措施,以缩小受影响最严重人群的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequent seizure and epilepsy-related emergency department visits in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Health disparities impact access to epilepsy care in the United States, but how these factors contribute to recurrent emergency department (ED) visits is unclear. We hypothesized that people who (1) were uninsured or had public health insurance, (2) belonged to minoritized racial/ethnic groups, or (3) resided in low-income zip codes were more likely to have frequent ED visits for seizure or epilepsy.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients presenting to the ED in four U.S. states (Florida, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin) with a primary diagnosis of seizure or epilepsy. We tracked ED visits for each patient longitudinally between 2016 and 2018. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluating the association of the above factors with a high (>2) vs low (1-2) number of ED visits.

Results: We identified 200 962 patients who visited the ED for seizure/epilepsy, of whom 28 598 (14.7%) presented 2 times during the study period. Compared to private insurance, individuals with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-1.99), Medicaid (aOR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.93-2.09), or no insurance (aOR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.48-1.62) had increased odds of high ED visits. Black patients had a 60% higher odds of frequent ED visits compared with White patients (aOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.55-1.65). However, these disparities were attenuated for Black patients with Medicare and Medicaid, vs private insurance. High ED use was not seen in other racial/ethnic groups. Finally, patients living in low-income zip codes (0-25th percentile of median household income; aOR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.58-1.73) were more likely to be in the high ED visit group, compared with the highest income quartile.

Significance: Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequities likely contribute to frequent ED visits for seizures, as evidenced by our findings from four U.S. states. Effective, multi-level interventions are needed to reduce disparities for those most affected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信