艾氯胺酮/咪达唑仑与瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑对机械通气急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼吸力学影响的比较

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Dujuan Qiao, Wei Liu, Huanjia Xue, Rui Liu, Ya Gao, Jingzhi Dong, Wei Wu, Junkai Feng, Min Li, Linong Yao
{"title":"艾氯胺酮/咪达唑仑与瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑对机械通气急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼吸力学影响的比较","authors":"Dujuan Qiao, Wei Liu, Huanjia Xue, Rui Liu, Ya Gao, Jingzhi Dong, Wei Wu, Junkai Feng, Min Li, Linong Yao","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03211-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esketamine exerts analgesic effects and has pharmacological properties of bronchodilation and elevation of mean arterial pressure, making it an interesting analgesic agent for patients with ARDS. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, patients with ARDS who were undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil/midazolam (n = 25) or esketamine/midazolam (n = 25). Both groups maintained equivalent levels of sedation and analgesia. The primary outcomes were airway resistance (R<sub>aw</sub>) and static respiratory system compliance (C<sub>st</sub>) at 24, 48, and 72 h post-medication administration. Plateau Pressure (P<sub>plat</sub>), peak airway pressure (P<sub>peak</sub>), hemodynamic parameters, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU length of stay were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C<sub>st</sub> at 72 h post-medication in esketamine group (49.8 ± 13.8) was higher than that in control group (42.4 ± 11.9) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in R<sub>aw</sub> at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-medication between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 72 h post-medication, both P<sub>plat</sub> and P<sub>peak</sub> in the esketamine group [(15.6 ± 3.1); (25.7 ± 3.8)] were significantly lower than those in the control group[(17.7 ± 4.2); (28.5 ± 4.7)] (P < 0.05). Additionally, the esketamine group [(256.6 ± 89.1); (266.4 ± 88.4); (284.92 ± 84.45)] demonstrated significantly higher PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios compared to the control group [(208.7 ± 61.5);(219.52 ± 61.28); (222.00 ± 68.54)] at all measured time points (P < 0.05). MAP and heart rate were higher in the esketamine group than in the control group, while cumulative doses of vasoactive drugs were comparatively lower in the esketamine group. The duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay did not-differ (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine/midazolam leads to improved in C<sub>st</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio compared to remifentanil/midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070733) on April 21, 2023. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Dujuan Qiao, Wei Liu, Huanjia Xue, Rui Liu, Ya Gao, Jingzhi Dong, Wei Wu, Junkai Feng, Min Li, Linong Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03211-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esketamine exerts analgesic effects and has pharmacological properties of bronchodilation and elevation of mean arterial pressure, making it an interesting analgesic agent for patients with ARDS. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, patients with ARDS who were undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil/midazolam (n = 25) or esketamine/midazolam (n = 25). Both groups maintained equivalent levels of sedation and analgesia. The primary outcomes were airway resistance (R<sub>aw</sub>) and static respiratory system compliance (C<sub>st</sub>) at 24, 48, and 72 h post-medication administration. Plateau Pressure (P<sub>plat</sub>), peak airway pressure (P<sub>peak</sub>), hemodynamic parameters, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU length of stay were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C<sub>st</sub> at 72 h post-medication in esketamine group (49.8 ± 13.8) was higher than that in control group (42.4 ± 11.9) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in R<sub>aw</sub> at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-medication between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 72 h post-medication, both P<sub>plat</sub> and P<sub>peak</sub> in the esketamine group [(15.6 ± 3.1); (25.7 ± 3.8)] were significantly lower than those in the control group[(17.7 ± 4.2); (28.5 ± 4.7)] (P < 0.05). Additionally, the esketamine group [(256.6 ± 89.1); (266.4 ± 88.4); (284.92 ± 84.45)] demonstrated significantly higher PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios compared to the control group [(208.7 ± 61.5);(219.52 ± 61.28); (222.00 ± 68.54)] at all measured time points (P < 0.05). MAP and heart rate were higher in the esketamine group than in the control group, while cumulative doses of vasoactive drugs were comparatively lower in the esketamine group. The duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay did not-differ (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine/midazolam leads to improved in C<sub>st</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio compared to remifentanil/midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070733) on April 21, 2023. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03211-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03211-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:艾氯胺酮具有镇痛作用,并具有支气管扩张和平均动脉压升高的药理特性,是治疗ARDS患者的一种有趣的镇痛药物。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较艾氯胺酮/咪达唑仑和瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑对机械通气ARDS患者呼吸力学和氧合的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照研究中,接受机械通气的ARDS患者被随机分配接受瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑(n = 25)或艾氯胺酮/咪达唑仑(n = 25)治疗。两组均保持相同的镇静和镇痛水平。给药后24、48和72小时的主要结局是气道阻力(Raw)和静态呼吸系统顺应性(Cst)。记录平台压(Pplat)、气道峰值压(Ppeak)、血流动力学参数、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间。结果:艾氯胺酮组患者用药后72 h Cst(49.8±13.8)高于对照组(42.4±11.9)(两组用药后24 h、48 h、72 h比较P < 0.05)。用药后72 h,艾氯胺酮组Pplat和Ppeak[(15.6±3.1);(25.7±3.8)]显著低于对照组(17.7±4.2);(28.5±4.7)](p 0.05)。结论:与瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑相比,艾氯胺酮/咪达唑仑可改善机械通气ARDS患者的Cst和PaO2/FiO2比率。临床试验注册:本研究于2023年4月21日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300070733)。网址:https://www.chictr.org.cn/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Background: Esketamine exerts analgesic effects and has pharmacological properties of bronchodilation and elevation of mean arterial pressure, making it an interesting analgesic agent for patients with ARDS. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, patients with ARDS who were undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil/midazolam (n = 25) or esketamine/midazolam (n = 25). Both groups maintained equivalent levels of sedation and analgesia. The primary outcomes were airway resistance (Raw) and static respiratory system compliance (Cst) at 24, 48, and 72 h post-medication administration. Plateau Pressure (Pplat), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), hemodynamic parameters, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU length of stay were also recorded.

Results: Cst at 72 h post-medication in esketamine group (49.8 ± 13.8) was higher than that in control group (42.4 ± 11.9) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Raw at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-medication between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 72 h post-medication, both Pplat and Ppeak in the esketamine group [(15.6 ± 3.1); (25.7 ± 3.8)] were significantly lower than those in the control group[(17.7 ± 4.2); (28.5 ± 4.7)] (P < 0.05). Additionally, the esketamine group [(256.6 ± 89.1); (266.4 ± 88.4); (284.92 ± 84.45)] demonstrated significantly higher PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios compared to the control group [(208.7 ± 61.5);(219.52 ± 61.28); (222.00 ± 68.54)] at all measured time points (P < 0.05). MAP and heart rate were higher in the esketamine group than in the control group, while cumulative doses of vasoactive drugs were comparatively lower in the esketamine group. The duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay did not-differ (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Esketamine/midazolam leads to improved in Cst and PaO2/FiO2 ratio compared to remifentanil/midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070733) on April 21, 2023. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信