人因方法和方法在初级保健远程会诊发展中的应用:一个系统的范围审查。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aimee Ferguson, Rosemary Newham, Emma Dunlop, Kate Preston, Marion Bennie
{"title":"人因方法和方法在初级保健远程会诊发展中的应用:一个系统的范围审查。","authors":"Aimee Ferguson, Rosemary Newham, Emma Dunlop, Kate Preston, Marion Bennie","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the level of encouragement seen in recent policy, it is important to understand how teleconsultation technologies are designed, implemented and used in primary care settings to further encourage their use. Despite being an area of research warranting interest from the area of human factors, knowledge of the discipline's application is scarce. This systematic scoping review aimed to identify human factors approaches and methods previously applied to the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Ergonomics Abstracts and Engineering Village were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Included studies were published 2010 onwards, focused on the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care and adopted an approach or method fitting within the domain of human factors. Key findings underwent a content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70 studies were identified, most published 2019 onwards. The review identified 20 human factors approaches, the majority of which were applied to evaluate the use of teleconsultations, with less focus on the design and implementation stages. A variety of data collection methods, theories, models and frameworks were found. Although the focus of all studies fits within the domain of human factors, none of the included studies referred to 'human factors' explicitly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings illustrate approaches that have been applied when designing, implementing and evaluating the use of teleconsultations. Although the studies may not have intended to adopt a human factors lens, the approaches used relate to the wider discipline. Further analysis of the studies evaluating use could provide insight into how these technologies are being used and the factors influencing use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Aimee Ferguson, Rosemary Newham, Emma Dunlop, Kate Preston, Marion Bennie\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the level of encouragement seen in recent policy, it is important to understand how teleconsultation technologies are designed, implemented and used in primary care settings to further encourage their use. Despite being an area of research warranting interest from the area of human factors, knowledge of the discipline's application is scarce. This systematic scoping review aimed to identify human factors approaches and methods previously applied to the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Ergonomics Abstracts and Engineering Village were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Included studies were published 2010 onwards, focused on the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care and adopted an approach or method fitting within the domain of human factors. Key findings underwent a content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70 studies were identified, most published 2019 onwards. The review identified 20 human factors approaches, the majority of which were applied to evaluate the use of teleconsultations, with less focus on the design and implementation stages. A variety of data collection methods, theories, models and frameworks were found. Although the focus of all studies fits within the domain of human factors, none of the included studies referred to 'human factors' explicitly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings illustrate approaches that have been applied when designing, implementing and evaluating the use of teleconsultations. Although the studies may not have intended to adopt a human factors lens, the approaches used relate to the wider discipline. Further analysis of the studies evaluating use could provide insight into how these technologies are being used and the factors influencing use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:鉴于近期政策的鼓励程度,了解远程咨询技术如何在初级保健机构中设计、实施和使用以进一步鼓励其使用是很重要的。尽管是一个研究领域,保证从人的因素领域的兴趣,知识的学科应用是稀缺的。这个系统的范围审查旨在确定人为因素的方法和方法以前应用于发展远程咨询技术在初级保健。方法:检索Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、Ergonomics Abstracts和Engineering Village等同行评议文章。纳入的研究于2010年以后发表,重点关注初级保健远程咨询技术的发展,并采用了适合人为因素领域的方法或方法。对主要发现进行了内容分析。结果:共确定了70项研究,其中大部分发表于2019年以后。审查确定了20种人为因素方法,其中大多数用于评估远程咨询的使用,对设计和实施阶段的关注较少。发现了各种数据收集方法、理论、模型和框架。虽然所有研究的重点都属于人为因素领域,但没有一项纳入的研究明确提到“人为因素”。结论:研究结果说明了在设计、实施和评估远程会诊使用时已应用的方法。虽然这些研究可能并没有打算采用人为因素的视角,但所使用的方法涉及到更广泛的学科。对评估使用情况的研究进行进一步分析,可以深入了解如何使用这些技术以及影响使用的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review.

Introduction: Given the level of encouragement seen in recent policy, it is important to understand how teleconsultation technologies are designed, implemented and used in primary care settings to further encourage their use. Despite being an area of research warranting interest from the area of human factors, knowledge of the discipline's application is scarce. This systematic scoping review aimed to identify human factors approaches and methods previously applied to the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care.

Methods: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Ergonomics Abstracts and Engineering Village were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Included studies were published 2010 onwards, focused on the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care and adopted an approach or method fitting within the domain of human factors. Key findings underwent a content analysis.

Results: 70 studies were identified, most published 2019 onwards. The review identified 20 human factors approaches, the majority of which were applied to evaluate the use of teleconsultations, with less focus on the design and implementation stages. A variety of data collection methods, theories, models and frameworks were found. Although the focus of all studies fits within the domain of human factors, none of the included studies referred to 'human factors' explicitly.

Conclusions: The findings illustrate approaches that have been applied when designing, implementing and evaluating the use of teleconsultations. Although the studies may not have intended to adopt a human factors lens, the approaches used relate to the wider discipline. Further analysis of the studies evaluating use could provide insight into how these technologies are being used and the factors influencing use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信