Abigail Danos, Alyssa Lear, Erin Roach, Nicholas J Quinn
{"title":"重症监护病房脓毒性休克患者氢化可的松给药频率:两种方案的比较。","authors":"Abigail Danos, Alyssa Lear, Erin Roach, Nicholas J Quinn","doi":"10.1177/10600280251355619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with septic shock, intravenous (IV) hydrocortisone is recommended when there is an ongoing vasopressor requirement. Guidelines recommend IV hydrocortisone 200 mg/day administered as a continuous infusion or 50 mg every 6 hours. To prevent waste during a hydrocortisone shortage and reduce cost, our institution implemented a dosing regimen of 100 mg every 12 hours.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to compare the impact of hydrocortisone 100 mg IV every 12 hours vs 50 mg IV every 6 hours on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter study that evaluated patients admitted from April 2022 to September 2023 to a Greater Charlotte Atrium Health facility. Adult patients diagnosed via the <i>International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision</i> (ICD-10) codes with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock receiving ≥15 mcg/min of norepinephrine equivalents requiring ≥ 24 hours of hydrocortisone were included. The primary outcome was time to shock reversal. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 446 screened patients, 111 were included. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and Charlson Comorbidity Index were similar among groups. The median time to shock reversal was 56 [34-81] hours in the every 12 hours group compared to 65 [39-101] hours in the every 6 hours group (<i>P</i> = 0.21). In-hospital mortality was comparable between the every 6 hours group and the every 12 hours group (51.9% vs 45.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.51). There was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay nor in incidence of hyperglycemic episodes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>There was no difference in the primary outcome of time to shock reversal or any secondary outcome between hydrocortisone groups. This alternative hydrocortisone dosing strategy may warrant further evaluation in large, prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280251355619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrocortisone Dosing Frequency in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Septic Shock: A Comparison of 2 Regimens.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Danos, Alyssa Lear, Erin Roach, Nicholas J Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280251355619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with septic shock, intravenous (IV) hydrocortisone is recommended when there is an ongoing vasopressor requirement. Guidelines recommend IV hydrocortisone 200 mg/day administered as a continuous infusion or 50 mg every 6 hours. To prevent waste during a hydrocortisone shortage and reduce cost, our institution implemented a dosing regimen of 100 mg every 12 hours.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to compare the impact of hydrocortisone 100 mg IV every 12 hours vs 50 mg IV every 6 hours on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter study that evaluated patients admitted from April 2022 to September 2023 to a Greater Charlotte Atrium Health facility. Adult patients diagnosed via the <i>International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision</i> (ICD-10) codes with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock receiving ≥15 mcg/min of norepinephrine equivalents requiring ≥ 24 hours of hydrocortisone were included. The primary outcome was time to shock reversal. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 446 screened patients, 111 were included. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and Charlson Comorbidity Index were similar among groups. The median time to shock reversal was 56 [34-81] hours in the every 12 hours group compared to 65 [39-101] hours in the every 6 hours group (<i>P</i> = 0.21). In-hospital mortality was comparable between the every 6 hours group and the every 12 hours group (51.9% vs 45.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.51). There was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay nor in incidence of hyperglycemic episodes between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>There was no difference in the primary outcome of time to shock reversal or any secondary outcome between hydrocortisone groups. This alternative hydrocortisone dosing strategy may warrant further evaluation in large, prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280251355619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251355619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251355619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在脓毒性休克患者中,当有持续的血管加压药物需求时,推荐静脉注射(IV)氢化可的松。指南建议静脉注射氢化可的松200毫克/天,连续输注或每6小时50毫克。为了防止氢化可的松短缺期间的浪费并降低成本,我们的机构实施了每12小时100毫克的给药方案。目的:本研究的主要目的是比较氢化可的松每12小时100mg静脉注射与每6小时50mg静脉注射对感染性休克患者临床结果的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性的多中心研究,评估了2022年4月至2023年9月在大夏洛特中庭医疗机构住院的患者。通过国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类第十版(ICD-10)代码诊断为脓毒症、严重脓毒症或感染性休克的成年患者接受≥15微克/分钟的去甲肾上腺素当量,需要≥24小时的氢化可的松治疗。主要结果是休克逆转的时间。次要结局包括住院死亡率、住院和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和高血糖。结果:筛选的446例患者中,纳入111例。两组间序贯器官衰竭评分中位数和Charlson合并症指数相似。每12小时组休克逆转的中位时间为56[34-81]小时,每6小时组为65[39-101]小时(P = 0.21)。住院死亡率在每6小时组和每12小时组之间具有可比性(51.9% vs 45.6%, P = 0.51)。两组患者在医院或ICU的住院时间以及高血糖发作的发生率均无差异。结论和相关性:在氢化可的松组之间,休克逆转时间的主要结局或任何次要结局没有差异。这种替代性氢化可的松给药策略可能需要在大型前瞻性研究中进一步评估。
Hydrocortisone Dosing Frequency in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Septic Shock: A Comparison of 2 Regimens.
Background: In patients with septic shock, intravenous (IV) hydrocortisone is recommended when there is an ongoing vasopressor requirement. Guidelines recommend IV hydrocortisone 200 mg/day administered as a continuous infusion or 50 mg every 6 hours. To prevent waste during a hydrocortisone shortage and reduce cost, our institution implemented a dosing regimen of 100 mg every 12 hours.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare the impact of hydrocortisone 100 mg IV every 12 hours vs 50 mg IV every 6 hours on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock.
Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study that evaluated patients admitted from April 2022 to September 2023 to a Greater Charlotte Atrium Health facility. Adult patients diagnosed via the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock receiving ≥15 mcg/min of norepinephrine equivalents requiring ≥ 24 hours of hydrocortisone were included. The primary outcome was time to shock reversal. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hyperglycemia.
Results: Of 446 screened patients, 111 were included. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and Charlson Comorbidity Index were similar among groups. The median time to shock reversal was 56 [34-81] hours in the every 12 hours group compared to 65 [39-101] hours in the every 6 hours group (P = 0.21). In-hospital mortality was comparable between the every 6 hours group and the every 12 hours group (51.9% vs 45.6%, P = 0.51). There was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay nor in incidence of hyperglycemic episodes between groups.
Conclusion and relevance: There was no difference in the primary outcome of time to shock reversal or any secondary outcome between hydrocortisone groups. This alternative hydrocortisone dosing strategy may warrant further evaluation in large, prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days