免疫抑制治疗与环孢素联合阿曲波帕治疗老年人重度再生障碍性贫血的疗效和安全性:一项多中心前瞻性研究

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Leyu Wang, Lei Ye, Xin Zhao, Miao Chen, Fengkui Zhang, Bing Han
{"title":"免疫抑制治疗与环孢素联合阿曲波帕治疗老年人重度再生障碍性贫血的疗效和安全性:一项多中心前瞻性研究","authors":"Leyu Wang, Lei Ye, Xin Zhao, Miao Chen, Fengkui Zhang, Bing Han","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01328-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This trial compared antithymocyte globulin (ATG) + cyclosporine A (CsA) + avatrombopag (AVA) and CsA + AVA in older adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). The patients were randomized to receive either ATG + CsA + AVA or CsA + AVA. Of 84 included patients, 42 were treated with ATG + CsA + AVA and 42 with CsA + AVA. With a median follow-up of 13 (0.3–17) months, the objective response rates (ORRs) at 3, 6, and 12 months and the end of follow-up were 53.7%, 65.9%, 80.6%, and 71.4% in the ATG + CsA + AVA group and 61.9%, 73.2%, 77.4%, and 64.3% in the CsA + AVA group, respectively (P &gt; 0.05 at any time point). Three-month ORR was an independent predictor of 6-month complete response rates (P = 0.019). Patients in the ATG + CsA + AVA group showed a higher incidence of adverse events than those in the CsA + AVA group (64.3% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.009). The rates of relapse (P = 0.667), mortality (P = 1.000) and clonal evolution (P = 1.000) were comparable between the groups. The combination of CsA + AVA achieved comparable efficacy with superior safety compared to the combination of ATG + CsA + AVA in older adults newly diagnosed with SAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy versus cyclosporine combined with avatrombopag in older adults with severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Leyu Wang, Lei Ye, Xin Zhao, Miao Chen, Fengkui Zhang, Bing Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-025-01328-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This trial compared antithymocyte globulin (ATG) + cyclosporine A (CsA) + avatrombopag (AVA) and CsA + AVA in older adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). The patients were randomized to receive either ATG + CsA + AVA or CsA + AVA. Of 84 included patients, 42 were treated with ATG + CsA + AVA and 42 with CsA + AVA. With a median follow-up of 13 (0.3–17) months, the objective response rates (ORRs) at 3, 6, and 12 months and the end of follow-up were 53.7%, 65.9%, 80.6%, and 71.4% in the ATG + CsA + AVA group and 61.9%, 73.2%, 77.4%, and 64.3% in the CsA + AVA group, respectively (P &gt; 0.05 at any time point). Three-month ORR was an independent predictor of 6-month complete response rates (P = 0.019). Patients in the ATG + CsA + AVA group showed a higher incidence of adverse events than those in the CsA + AVA group (64.3% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.009). The rates of relapse (P = 0.667), mortality (P = 1.000) and clonal evolution (P = 1.000) were comparable between the groups. The combination of CsA + AVA achieved comparable efficacy with superior safety compared to the combination of ATG + CsA + AVA in older adults newly diagnosed with SAA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01328-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01328-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该试验比较了抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG) +环孢素A (CsA) +阿瓦曲波帕(AVA)和CsA + AVA在老年人重度再生障碍性贫血(SAA)中的作用。患者随机接受ATG + CsA + AVA或CsA + AVA治疗。84例纳入的患者中,42例采用ATG + CsA + AVA治疗,42例采用CsA + AVA治疗。中位随访13(0.3 ~ 17)个月,ATG + CsA + AVA组3、6、12个月及随访结束时的客观缓解率(orr)分别为53.7%、65.9%、80.6%、71.4%,CsA + AVA组61.9%、73.2%、77.4%、64.3%(任意时间点P >; 0.05)。3个月ORR是6个月完全缓解率的独立预测因子(P = 0.019)。ATG + CsA + AVA组患者不良事件发生率高于CsA + AVA组(64.3% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.009)。两组间复发率(P = 0.667)、死亡率(P = 1.000)和克隆进化(P = 1.000)具有可比性。在新诊断为SAA的老年人中,与ATG + CsA + AVA联合治疗相比,CsA + AVA联合治疗获得了相当的疗效和更高的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy versus cyclosporine combined with avatrombopag in older adults with severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter prospective study

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy versus cyclosporine combined with avatrombopag in older adults with severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter prospective study

This trial compared antithymocyte globulin (ATG) + cyclosporine A (CsA) + avatrombopag (AVA) and CsA + AVA in older adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). The patients were randomized to receive either ATG + CsA + AVA or CsA + AVA. Of 84 included patients, 42 were treated with ATG + CsA + AVA and 42 with CsA + AVA. With a median follow-up of 13 (0.3–17) months, the objective response rates (ORRs) at 3, 6, and 12 months and the end of follow-up were 53.7%, 65.9%, 80.6%, and 71.4% in the ATG + CsA + AVA group and 61.9%, 73.2%, 77.4%, and 64.3% in the CsA + AVA group, respectively (P > 0.05 at any time point). Three-month ORR was an independent predictor of 6-month complete response rates (P = 0.019). Patients in the ATG + CsA + AVA group showed a higher incidence of adverse events than those in the CsA + AVA group (64.3% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.009). The rates of relapse (P = 0.667), mortality (P = 1.000) and clonal evolution (P = 1.000) were comparable between the groups. The combination of CsA + AVA achieved comparable efficacy with superior safety compared to the combination of ATG + CsA + AVA in older adults newly diagnosed with SAA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信