在门诊开始使用氯氮平:一项检查成本效益、可行性和安全性的回顾性研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Jarrad Paul, Bolanle Ayeni, Rinaldo Ienco, Flavie Waters, Sunny Varghese, Thinh Nguyen, Gordon Shymko
{"title":"在门诊开始使用氯氮平:一项检查成本效益、可行性和安全性的回顾性研究。","authors":"Jarrad Paul, Bolanle Ayeni, Rinaldo Ienco, Flavie Waters, Sunny Varghese, Thinh Nguyen, Gordon Shymko","doi":"10.1177/10398562251358132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimEvidence supporting an outpatient initiation model for clozapine is lacking and would add to prescriber, service and consumer confidence in the safety and benefits of this approach. Our study aims to determine whether outpatient initiation and titration of clozapine is feasible, safe and cost-effective in Australia.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 27 consumers aged 18-65 admitted to our service between 2007 and 2019 for day initiation and outpatient titration of clozapine. We collected demographic and clinical data from medical records including diagnosis, adverse drug reactions, hospitalisations and adherence. We compared costs over the initial fortnight of initiating clozapine through our outpatient model versus an inpatient admission for schizophrenia of equivalent duration using local standardised costing data.ResultsWe demonstrated that the cost differential between our model for clozapine initiation in the outpatient setting versus an inpatient admission was $24421.96 per patient over the first fortnight. Adherence, side effects and safety, including access to hospitalisation as needed, were comparable to prior studies.ConclusionsClozapine initiation in an outpatient setting is likely to produce significant cost savings whilst being feasible and safe. There were no appreciable effects on treatment adherence or adverse drug reactions. Limitations include a small sample size and retrospective methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251358132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initiating clozapine in the outpatient setting: A retrospective study examining the cost-effectiveness, feasibility and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Jarrad Paul, Bolanle Ayeni, Rinaldo Ienco, Flavie Waters, Sunny Varghese, Thinh Nguyen, Gordon Shymko\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10398562251358132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AimEvidence supporting an outpatient initiation model for clozapine is lacking and would add to prescriber, service and consumer confidence in the safety and benefits of this approach. Our study aims to determine whether outpatient initiation and titration of clozapine is feasible, safe and cost-effective in Australia.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 27 consumers aged 18-65 admitted to our service between 2007 and 2019 for day initiation and outpatient titration of clozapine. We collected demographic and clinical data from medical records including diagnosis, adverse drug reactions, hospitalisations and adherence. We compared costs over the initial fortnight of initiating clozapine through our outpatient model versus an inpatient admission for schizophrenia of equivalent duration using local standardised costing data.ResultsWe demonstrated that the cost differential between our model for clozapine initiation in the outpatient setting versus an inpatient admission was $24421.96 per patient over the first fortnight. Adherence, side effects and safety, including access to hospitalisation as needed, were comparable to prior studies.ConclusionsClozapine initiation in an outpatient setting is likely to produce significant cost savings whilst being feasible and safe. There were no appreciable effects on treatment adherence or adverse drug reactions. Limitations include a small sample size and retrospective methodology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10398562251358132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251358132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251358132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的缺乏支持氯氮平门诊起始模型的证据,这将增加处方者、服务和消费者对该方法安全性和益处的信心。我们的研究旨在确定门诊开始和滴定氯氮平在澳大利亚是否可行、安全且具有成本效益。方法回顾性选取2007年至2019年间入院的27名年龄在18-65岁之间的消费者,进行氯氮平的日间起始和门诊滴定。我们从医疗记录中收集了人口统计和临床数据,包括诊断、药物不良反应、住院和依从性。我们使用当地标准化的成本数据,比较了通过门诊模型开始使用氯氮平的最初两周的成本与同等持续时间的精神分裂症住院患者的成本。结果我们证明,在前两周,我们的模型中门诊氯氮平开始治疗与住院治疗的成本差异为每位患者24421.96美元。依从性、副作用和安全性,包括根据需要住院治疗,与先前的研究相当。结论氯氮平在门诊开始使用是可行和安全的,可能产生显著的成本节约。对治疗依从性或药物不良反应没有明显影响。局限性包括样本量小和回顾性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initiating clozapine in the outpatient setting: A retrospective study examining the cost-effectiveness, feasibility and safety.

AimEvidence supporting an outpatient initiation model for clozapine is lacking and would add to prescriber, service and consumer confidence in the safety and benefits of this approach. Our study aims to determine whether outpatient initiation and titration of clozapine is feasible, safe and cost-effective in Australia.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 27 consumers aged 18-65 admitted to our service between 2007 and 2019 for day initiation and outpatient titration of clozapine. We collected demographic and clinical data from medical records including diagnosis, adverse drug reactions, hospitalisations and adherence. We compared costs over the initial fortnight of initiating clozapine through our outpatient model versus an inpatient admission for schizophrenia of equivalent duration using local standardised costing data.ResultsWe demonstrated that the cost differential between our model for clozapine initiation in the outpatient setting versus an inpatient admission was $24421.96 per patient over the first fortnight. Adherence, side effects and safety, including access to hospitalisation as needed, were comparable to prior studies.ConclusionsClozapine initiation in an outpatient setting is likely to produce significant cost savings whilst being feasible and safe. There were no appreciable effects on treatment adherence or adverse drug reactions. Limitations include a small sample size and retrospective methodology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信