2015年至2023年美国成人心血管疾病患者的医疗保健可及性和风险因素控制

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tracy T Makuvire, Zara Latif, Sierra Atwater, Mansi K Shah, Jose Lopez, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Nasrien E Ibrahim
{"title":"2015年至2023年美国成人心血管疾病患者的医疗保健可及性和风险因素控制","authors":"Tracy T Makuvire, Zara Latif, Sierra Atwater, Mansi K Shah, Jose Lopez, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Nasrien E Ibrahim","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted multiple dimensions of care for adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its associated risk factors. We investigated the changes in health access, disease awareness, treatment, and control among adults with CVD or CVD risk factors after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from January 2015 to August 2023 of a civilian adult US population aged ≥20 years. We assessed independent measures of the management of hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), and diabetes (DM) among participants and health access post-COVID-19. Treatment was defined as a positive response to medical therapy. Control was defined as values that achieved recommended targets of hemoglobin A1C <7.0%, mean systolic blood pressure (BP) <130 mmHg, and total cholesterol <150 mg/dL and/or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <70 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 14,354 adults (unweighted) with CVD or CVD risk factors pre and post COVID-19. Compared to pre-COVID-19, high risk adults had higher diastolic BP (73 vs. 76 mmHg, p<0.001), and greater awareness of high cholesterol (63% vs. 66%, p=0.03) and prediabetes (24% vs. 27%, p=0.01) in post-COVID-19 period. However, fewer reported treatments for HTN (89% vs. 80%, p < 0.001) and HLD (50% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Among adults with CVD risk factors only, adjusted analyses showed declines in HTN awareness (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98, p=0.02) and treatment (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.42, p<0.001), with unchanged BP control. Across all high-risk adults, DM treatment increased (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.96, p<0.001), while glycemic control worsened (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p=0.023). Overall health access improved post-pandemic (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10-2.14, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In this high-risk population, health care access improved post-pandemic, but changes in risk factor control were inconsistent. Despite declines in BP awareness and treatment among individuals with CVD or risk factors, overall BP control improved. In contrast, glycemic control worsened despite increased diabetes treatment. These findings highlight a disconnect between patient reported treatment and effective disease control, raising concern for emerging gaps in CVD risk management in the post-pandemic era.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care Access and Risk Factor Control in US adults with Cardiovascular Disease from 2015 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy T Makuvire, Zara Latif, Sierra Atwater, Mansi K Shah, Jose Lopez, Ersilia M DeFilippis, Nasrien E Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.06.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted multiple dimensions of care for adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its associated risk factors. We investigated the changes in health access, disease awareness, treatment, and control among adults with CVD or CVD risk factors after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from January 2015 to August 2023 of a civilian adult US population aged ≥20 years. We assessed independent measures of the management of hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), and diabetes (DM) among participants and health access post-COVID-19. Treatment was defined as a positive response to medical therapy. Control was defined as values that achieved recommended targets of hemoglobin A1C <7.0%, mean systolic blood pressure (BP) <130 mmHg, and total cholesterol <150 mg/dL and/or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <70 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 14,354 adults (unweighted) with CVD or CVD risk factors pre and post COVID-19. Compared to pre-COVID-19, high risk adults had higher diastolic BP (73 vs. 76 mmHg, p<0.001), and greater awareness of high cholesterol (63% vs. 66%, p=0.03) and prediabetes (24% vs. 27%, p=0.01) in post-COVID-19 period. However, fewer reported treatments for HTN (89% vs. 80%, p < 0.001) and HLD (50% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Among adults with CVD risk factors only, adjusted analyses showed declines in HTN awareness (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98, p=0.02) and treatment (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.42, p<0.001), with unchanged BP control. Across all high-risk adults, DM treatment increased (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.96, p<0.001), while glycemic control worsened (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p=0.023). Overall health access improved post-pandemic (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10-2.14, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In this high-risk population, health care access improved post-pandemic, but changes in risk factor control were inconsistent. Despite declines in BP awareness and treatment among individuals with CVD or risk factors, overall BP control improved. In contrast, glycemic control worsened despite increased diabetes treatment. These findings highlight a disconnect between patient reported treatment and effective disease control, raising concern for emerging gaps in CVD risk management in the post-pandemic era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.06.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.06.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行严重破坏了成人心血管疾病(CVD)及其相关危险因素的多个维度的护理。我们调查了大流行后患有心血管疾病或心血管疾病危险因素的成年人在健康获取、疾病意识、治疗和控制方面的变化。方法:我们分析了2015年1月至2023年8月美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)数据,该数据来自年龄≥20岁的美国成年平民。我们评估了参与者中高血压(HTN)、高脂血症(HLD)和糖尿病(DM)的管理和covid -19后健康获取的独立措施。治疗被定义为对药物治疗的积极反应。结果:我们分析了14354名在COVID-19之前和之后患有心血管疾病或心血管疾病危险因素的成年人(未加权)。与covid -19前相比,高危成人的舒张压更高(73对76 mmHg)。结论及相关性:在这一高危人群中,大流行后医疗保健可及性得到改善,但危险因素控制的变化不一致。尽管有心血管疾病或危险因素的个体对血压的认知和治疗有所下降,但总体血压控制有所改善。相比之下,尽管增加了糖尿病治疗,血糖控制却恶化了。这些发现突出了患者报告的治疗与有效的疾病控制之间的脱节,引起了人们对大流行后时代心血管疾病风险管理出现差距的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Care Access and Risk Factor Control in US adults with Cardiovascular Disease from 2015 to 2023.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted multiple dimensions of care for adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its associated risk factors. We investigated the changes in health access, disease awareness, treatment, and control among adults with CVD or CVD risk factors after the pandemic.

Methods: We analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from January 2015 to August 2023 of a civilian adult US population aged ≥20 years. We assessed independent measures of the management of hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), and diabetes (DM) among participants and health access post-COVID-19. Treatment was defined as a positive response to medical therapy. Control was defined as values that achieved recommended targets of hemoglobin A1C <7.0%, mean systolic blood pressure (BP) <130 mmHg, and total cholesterol <150 mg/dL and/or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <70 mg/dL.

Results: We analyzed 14,354 adults (unweighted) with CVD or CVD risk factors pre and post COVID-19. Compared to pre-COVID-19, high risk adults had higher diastolic BP (73 vs. 76 mmHg, p<0.001), and greater awareness of high cholesterol (63% vs. 66%, p=0.03) and prediabetes (24% vs. 27%, p=0.01) in post-COVID-19 period. However, fewer reported treatments for HTN (89% vs. 80%, p < 0.001) and HLD (50% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Among adults with CVD risk factors only, adjusted analyses showed declines in HTN awareness (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98, p=0.02) and treatment (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.42, p<0.001), with unchanged BP control. Across all high-risk adults, DM treatment increased (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.96, p<0.001), while glycemic control worsened (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p=0.023). Overall health access improved post-pandemic (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10-2.14, p=0.01).

Conclusion and relevance: In this high-risk population, health care access improved post-pandemic, but changes in risk factor control were inconsistent. Despite declines in BP awareness and treatment among individuals with CVD or risk factors, overall BP control improved. In contrast, glycemic control worsened despite increased diabetes treatment. These findings highlight a disconnect between patient reported treatment and effective disease control, raising concern for emerging gaps in CVD risk management in the post-pandemic era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信