fit4手术:一项随机对照试验,旨在评估卵巢癌减脂手术前康复的可行性

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jason N. Silberman , Annella Benjamin , Payton Solk , Daniela Matei , Raanan Alter , Emily Hinchcliff , Dario Roque , Jenna Marcus , Edward Tanner , June M. McKoy , Ann Marie Flores , Masha Kocherginsky , Siobhan Phillips , Emma Barber
{"title":"fit4手术:一项随机对照试验,旨在评估卵巢癌减脂手术前康复的可行性","authors":"Jason N. Silberman ,&nbsp;Annella Benjamin ,&nbsp;Payton Solk ,&nbsp;Daniela Matei ,&nbsp;Raanan Alter ,&nbsp;Emily Hinchcliff ,&nbsp;Dario Roque ,&nbsp;Jenna Marcus ,&nbsp;Edward Tanner ,&nbsp;June M. McKoy ,&nbsp;Ann Marie Flores ,&nbsp;Masha Kocherginsky ,&nbsp;Siobhan Phillips ,&nbsp;Emma Barber","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.06.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the feasibility of enrolling women with ovarian cancer in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a home-based, patient-tailored physical activity prehabilitation program (Fit4Surgery, F4S) and assess adherence while estimating effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), frailty, and physical function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty patients aged ≥60 with ovarian cancer, scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, were randomized 2:1 to Fit4Surgery or educational control. The intervention group received a Fitbit, access to the F4S app, and weekly coaching calls. Controls received educational calls and access to the Cancer.Net app. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as &gt;80 % evaluability and adherence. Daily steps and PROs were compared using paired <em>t</em>-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 74 patients approached, 32 consented and 30 were randomized. Average age was 69.7 years (range 60–81). Ninety percent of patients completed both baseline and pre-surgical assessments. Patients wore their FitBit on 94 % of days, attended 97 % of coaching calls, and engaged with the F4S app on 80 % of days. Patients reached personal step goals on 49 % of days, while 77.8 % of patients increased their daily steps over the intervention, with an average increase of 1804 steps per day (37 % increase, <em>p</em> = 0.01). Patient-reported physical function (<em>p</em> = 0.09) and frailty-related metrics, including energy levels (p = 0.01) and weekly walks (<em>p</em> = 0.02) improved in the F4S group, while no differences were detected in surgical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Fit4Surgery was feasible with high engagement and adherence. Patients demonstrated increased daily step count and positive trends in PROs, frailty, and physical function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"199 ","pages":"Pages 116-123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fit4Surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of prehabilitation prior to debulking surgery for ovarian cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jason N. Silberman ,&nbsp;Annella Benjamin ,&nbsp;Payton Solk ,&nbsp;Daniela Matei ,&nbsp;Raanan Alter ,&nbsp;Emily Hinchcliff ,&nbsp;Dario Roque ,&nbsp;Jenna Marcus ,&nbsp;Edward Tanner ,&nbsp;June M. McKoy ,&nbsp;Ann Marie Flores ,&nbsp;Masha Kocherginsky ,&nbsp;Siobhan Phillips ,&nbsp;Emma Barber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.06.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the feasibility of enrolling women with ovarian cancer in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a home-based, patient-tailored physical activity prehabilitation program (Fit4Surgery, F4S) and assess adherence while estimating effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), frailty, and physical function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty patients aged ≥60 with ovarian cancer, scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, were randomized 2:1 to Fit4Surgery or educational control. The intervention group received a Fitbit, access to the F4S app, and weekly coaching calls. Controls received educational calls and access to the Cancer.Net app. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as &gt;80 % evaluability and adherence. Daily steps and PROs were compared using paired <em>t</em>-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 74 patients approached, 32 consented and 30 were randomized. Average age was 69.7 years (range 60–81). Ninety percent of patients completed both baseline and pre-surgical assessments. Patients wore their FitBit on 94 % of days, attended 97 % of coaching calls, and engaged with the F4S app on 80 % of days. Patients reached personal step goals on 49 % of days, while 77.8 % of patients increased their daily steps over the intervention, with an average increase of 1804 steps per day (37 % increase, <em>p</em> = 0.01). Patient-reported physical function (<em>p</em> = 0.09) and frailty-related metrics, including energy levels (p = 0.01) and weekly walks (<em>p</em> = 0.02) improved in the F4S group, while no differences were detected in surgical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Fit4Surgery was feasible with high engagement and adherence. Patients demonstrated increased daily step count and positive trends in PROs, frailty, and physical function.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 116-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825008960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825008960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估将卵巢癌女性纳入一项以家庭为基础、患者量身定制的身体活动预康复计划(Fit4Surgery, F4S)的随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,并评估依从性,同时评估对患者报告的结局(PROs)、虚弱和身体功能的影响。方法30例年龄≥60岁、计划行新辅助化疗和手术的卵巢癌患者,按2:1随机分为fit4手术组和教育对照组。干预组获得了Fitbit, F4S应用程序的访问权限,以及每周的指导电话。控制组接到教育电话并进入巨蟹座。主要结局是可行性,定义为80%的可评估性和依从性。使用配对t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验比较每日步数和PROs。结果74例患者中,32例同意,30例随机分组。平均年龄69.7岁(60-81岁)。90%的患者完成了基线和术前评估。患者佩戴FitBit的天数占94%,参加97%的辅导电话,使用F4S应用的天数占80%。患者达到个人步数目标的天数为49%,而77.8%的患者在干预期间增加了每日步数,平均每天增加1804步(增加37%,p = 0.01)。患者报告的身体功能(p = 0.09)和虚弱相关指标,包括能量水平(p = 0.01)和每周步行(p = 0.02)在F4S组得到改善,而手术结果没有发现差异。结论fit4手术是可行的,手术配合度高,依从性好。患者表现出每日步数增加和PROs、虚弱和身体功能的积极趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fit4Surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of prehabilitation prior to debulking surgery for ovarian cancer

Objectives

To assess the feasibility of enrolling women with ovarian cancer in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a home-based, patient-tailored physical activity prehabilitation program (Fit4Surgery, F4S) and assess adherence while estimating effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), frailty, and physical function.

Methods

Thirty patients aged ≥60 with ovarian cancer, scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, were randomized 2:1 to Fit4Surgery or educational control. The intervention group received a Fitbit, access to the F4S app, and weekly coaching calls. Controls received educational calls and access to the Cancer.Net app. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as >80 % evaluability and adherence. Daily steps and PROs were compared using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

Results

Of 74 patients approached, 32 consented and 30 were randomized. Average age was 69.7 years (range 60–81). Ninety percent of patients completed both baseline and pre-surgical assessments. Patients wore their FitBit on 94 % of days, attended 97 % of coaching calls, and engaged with the F4S app on 80 % of days. Patients reached personal step goals on 49 % of days, while 77.8 % of patients increased their daily steps over the intervention, with an average increase of 1804 steps per day (37 % increase, p = 0.01). Patient-reported physical function (p = 0.09) and frailty-related metrics, including energy levels (p = 0.01) and weekly walks (p = 0.02) improved in the F4S group, while no differences were detected in surgical outcomes.

Conclusions

Fit4Surgery was feasible with high engagement and adherence. Patients demonstrated increased daily step count and positive trends in PROs, frailty, and physical function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信