放牧动物行为分类算法与开源可穿戴传感器的比较

IF 5.7 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
B.R. dos Reis , S. Sujani , D.R. Fuka , Z.M. Easton , R.R. White
{"title":"放牧动物行为分类算法与开源可穿戴传感器的比较","authors":"B.R. dos Reis ,&nbsp;S. Sujani ,&nbsp;D.R. Fuka ,&nbsp;Z.M. Easton ,&nbsp;R.R. White","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.101133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Behavioral monitoring for pasture-based production has the potential to improve the efficiency of livestock operations without increasing labor costs. The application of technologies for remotely monitoring animal behavior has expanded rapidly in the last decade, especially in confinement operations. However, automated systems for extensive operations are limited by the interrelated challenges of power use and data transmission. The objective of this study was to explore behavioral classification techniques suitable for using an open-source wearable sensor system deployed on extensively grazed cows. Behavior classification analyses leveraged simple approaches (analysis of variance and logistic regression), as well as more complex machine learning algorithms (support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF)) to better understand the trade-offs between classification approach complexity and accuracy. Behavioral observations were conducted by two independent observers at the field. Algorithms were used to classify four behaviors: grazing, lying, standing, and walking using data aggregated across either 1-second or 1-minute intervals. Algorithms were also compared under situations assuming continuous monitoring compared with periodic snapshots of data representing a scenario where the sensor was only activated every 3 or 5 s. Grazing was the most accurately (93 %) classified behavior followed by laying (92 %) when a 1-minute timestep was used to train the RF model. At both timesteps, SVM and RF were capable of distinguishing among behaviors with improved accuracy compared with simplistic approaches. Similar accuracies were found when evaluating the RF model on the 3 and 5-second iteration, indicating power saving may be achieved by periodic, rather than continuous sampling. As microprocessors continue to advance in terms of their capacity to execute machine learning algorithms, these approaches may help improve the usability of inertial measurement unit sensors for behavioral monitoring in extensive production systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101133"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison among grazing animal behavior classification algorithms for use with open-source wearable sensors\",\"authors\":\"B.R. dos Reis ,&nbsp;S. Sujani ,&nbsp;D.R. Fuka ,&nbsp;Z.M. Easton ,&nbsp;R.R. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atech.2025.101133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Behavioral monitoring for pasture-based production has the potential to improve the efficiency of livestock operations without increasing labor costs. The application of technologies for remotely monitoring animal behavior has expanded rapidly in the last decade, especially in confinement operations. However, automated systems for extensive operations are limited by the interrelated challenges of power use and data transmission. The objective of this study was to explore behavioral classification techniques suitable for using an open-source wearable sensor system deployed on extensively grazed cows. Behavior classification analyses leveraged simple approaches (analysis of variance and logistic regression), as well as more complex machine learning algorithms (support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF)) to better understand the trade-offs between classification approach complexity and accuracy. Behavioral observations were conducted by two independent observers at the field. Algorithms were used to classify four behaviors: grazing, lying, standing, and walking using data aggregated across either 1-second or 1-minute intervals. Algorithms were also compared under situations assuming continuous monitoring compared with periodic snapshots of data representing a scenario where the sensor was only activated every 3 or 5 s. Grazing was the most accurately (93 %) classified behavior followed by laying (92 %) when a 1-minute timestep was used to train the RF model. At both timesteps, SVM and RF were capable of distinguishing among behaviors with improved accuracy compared with simplistic approaches. Similar accuracies were found when evaluating the RF model on the 3 and 5-second iteration, indicating power saving may be achieved by periodic, rather than continuous sampling. As microprocessors continue to advance in terms of their capacity to execute machine learning algorithms, these approaches may help improve the usability of inertial measurement unit sensors for behavioral monitoring in extensive production systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552500365X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552500365X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对牧场生产进行行为监测有可能在不增加劳动力成本的情况下提高畜牧业经营效率。在过去十年中,远程监测动物行为的技术应用迅速扩大,特别是在禁闭操作中。然而,广泛操作的自动化系统受到电力使用和数据传输相关挑战的限制。本研究的目的是探索适用于广泛放牧奶牛使用的开源可穿戴传感器系统的行为分类技术。行为分类分析利用简单的方法(方差分析和逻辑回归)以及更复杂的机器学习算法(支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF))来更好地理解分类方法复杂性和准确性之间的权衡。行为观察是由两名独立观察员在现场进行的。使用算法对四种行为进行分类:放牧、躺卧、站立和行走,这些行为的收集时间间隔为1秒或1分钟。还比较了假设连续监测的情况下的算法与代表传感器每3或5秒激活一次的周期性数据快照的情况下的算法。当使用1分钟的时间步长来训练RF模型时,放牧是最准确的分类行为(93%),其次是产卵(92%)。在这两个时间步长,SVM和RF都能够区分行为,与简单的方法相比,准确率更高。在3秒和5秒迭代上评估RF模型时发现了类似的精度,这表明可以通过周期性采样而不是连续采样来实现节能。随着微处理器在执行机器学习算法方面的能力不断提高,这些方法可能有助于提高惯性测量单元传感器在广泛生产系统中行为监测的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison among grazing animal behavior classification algorithms for use with open-source wearable sensors
Behavioral monitoring for pasture-based production has the potential to improve the efficiency of livestock operations without increasing labor costs. The application of technologies for remotely monitoring animal behavior has expanded rapidly in the last decade, especially in confinement operations. However, automated systems for extensive operations are limited by the interrelated challenges of power use and data transmission. The objective of this study was to explore behavioral classification techniques suitable for using an open-source wearable sensor system deployed on extensively grazed cows. Behavior classification analyses leveraged simple approaches (analysis of variance and logistic regression), as well as more complex machine learning algorithms (support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF)) to better understand the trade-offs between classification approach complexity and accuracy. Behavioral observations were conducted by two independent observers at the field. Algorithms were used to classify four behaviors: grazing, lying, standing, and walking using data aggregated across either 1-second or 1-minute intervals. Algorithms were also compared under situations assuming continuous monitoring compared with periodic snapshots of data representing a scenario where the sensor was only activated every 3 or 5 s. Grazing was the most accurately (93 %) classified behavior followed by laying (92 %) when a 1-minute timestep was used to train the RF model. At both timesteps, SVM and RF were capable of distinguishing among behaviors with improved accuracy compared with simplistic approaches. Similar accuracies were found when evaluating the RF model on the 3 and 5-second iteration, indicating power saving may be achieved by periodic, rather than continuous sampling. As microprocessors continue to advance in terms of their capacity to execute machine learning algorithms, these approaches may help improve the usability of inertial measurement unit sensors for behavioral monitoring in extensive production systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信