利用电子健康记录数据预测尿脓毒症的机器学习。

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000896
Varuni Sarwal, Nadav Rakocz, Georgina Dominique, Jeffrey N Chiang, A Lenore Ackerman
{"title":"利用电子健康记录数据预测尿脓毒症的机器学习。","authors":"Varuni Sarwal, Nadav Rakocz, Georgina Dominique, Jeffrey N Chiang, A Lenore Ackerman","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urosepsis, a medical condition resulting from the progression of urinary tract infection (UTI), is a leading cause of death in the US. Urosepsis occurs due to complicated UTI and constitutes ~25% of sepsis cases. Early prediction of urosepsis is critical in providing personalized care, reducing diagnostic uncertainty, lowering mortality rates. While machine learning (ML) techniques have the potential to aid healthcare professionals in identifying risk factors and recommending treatment options, no study has been developed to predict the development of urosepsis in patients with a suspected UTI in outpatient settings. We develop and evaluate ML models in predicting hospital admission and urosepsis diagnosis for patients with an outpatient UTI encounter, leveraging de-identified electronic health records sourced from UCLA. Inclusion criteria included a positive diagnosis of urinary tract infection indicated by ICD-10 code N30/N93.0 and positive bacteria result via urinalysis in an ambulatory setting. W extracted demographic information, urinalysis findings, and antibiotics prescribed for each instance of UTI. Reencounters we defined as encounters within seven days of the initial UTI. Reencounters were considered urosepsis-related if matching positive blood and urine cultures were found with a sepsis ICD-10 code of A41/R78/R65. ML models were trained and evaluated on two tasks: prediction of a reencounter leading to hospitalization, prediction of Urosepsis. Model performances were stratified by ethnicities. Random forest models achieved significant improvement over baseline performance (APR = 0.004), with APR = 0.15 for reencounters and 0.31 for urosepsis prediction. While these APR values reflect the challenge of predicting rare events (0.4% prevalence), they represent meaningful predictive power for clinical risk stratification. We computed Shapley values to interpret model predictions and found patient age, sex, and urinary WBC-count were the top three predictive features. Our study has the potential to assist clinicians in the identification of high-risk patients, informed decisions about antibiotic prescription and improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 7","pages":"e0000896"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning for the prediction of urosepsis using electronic health record data.\",\"authors\":\"Varuni Sarwal, Nadav Rakocz, Georgina Dominique, Jeffrey N Chiang, A Lenore Ackerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urosepsis, a medical condition resulting from the progression of urinary tract infection (UTI), is a leading cause of death in the US. Urosepsis occurs due to complicated UTI and constitutes ~25% of sepsis cases. Early prediction of urosepsis is critical in providing personalized care, reducing diagnostic uncertainty, lowering mortality rates. While machine learning (ML) techniques have the potential to aid healthcare professionals in identifying risk factors and recommending treatment options, no study has been developed to predict the development of urosepsis in patients with a suspected UTI in outpatient settings. We develop and evaluate ML models in predicting hospital admission and urosepsis diagnosis for patients with an outpatient UTI encounter, leveraging de-identified electronic health records sourced from UCLA. Inclusion criteria included a positive diagnosis of urinary tract infection indicated by ICD-10 code N30/N93.0 and positive bacteria result via urinalysis in an ambulatory setting. W extracted demographic information, urinalysis findings, and antibiotics prescribed for each instance of UTI. Reencounters we defined as encounters within seven days of the initial UTI. Reencounters were considered urosepsis-related if matching positive blood and urine cultures were found with a sepsis ICD-10 code of A41/R78/R65. ML models were trained and evaluated on two tasks: prediction of a reencounter leading to hospitalization, prediction of Urosepsis. Model performances were stratified by ethnicities. Random forest models achieved significant improvement over baseline performance (APR = 0.004), with APR = 0.15 for reencounters and 0.31 for urosepsis prediction. While these APR values reflect the challenge of predicting rare events (0.4% prevalence), they represent meaningful predictive power for clinical risk stratification. We computed Shapley values to interpret model predictions and found patient age, sex, and urinary WBC-count were the top three predictive features. Our study has the potential to assist clinicians in the identification of high-risk patients, informed decisions about antibiotic prescription and improving patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"e0000896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿脓毒症是一种由尿路感染(UTI)进展引起的疾病,是美国主要的死亡原因。尿脓毒症是由复杂的尿路感染引起的,占脓毒症病例的25%。尿脓毒症的早期预测对于提供个性化护理,减少诊断的不确定性,降低死亡率至关重要。虽然机器学习(ML)技术有可能帮助医疗保健专业人员识别风险因素并推荐治疗方案,但尚未开展研究来预测门诊疑似尿路感染患者的尿脓毒症的发展。利用来自加州大学洛杉矶分校的去识别电子健康记录,我们开发并评估了ML模型在预测门诊尿路感染患者住院和尿脓毒症诊断方面的作用。纳入标准为ICD-10代码N30/N93.0诊断为尿路感染阳性,门诊尿检结果为细菌阳性。W提取了人口统计信息、尿液分析结果和每个尿路感染病例的抗生素处方。我们将再次遭遇定义为首次UTI后7天内的遭遇。如果发现血液和尿液培养符合败血症ICD-10代码A41/R78/R65,则认为与尿毒有关。ML模型在两项任务上进行训练和评估:预测再次遭遇导致住院,预测尿脓毒症。模特表演按种族分层。随机森林模型比基线性能有显著改善(APR = 0.004),预测尿脓毒症的APR = 0.15,预测尿脓毒症的APR为0.31。虽然这些APR值反映了预测罕见事件的挑战(0.4%的患病率),但它们代表了临床风险分层的有意义的预测能力。我们计算Shapley值来解释模型预测,发现患者的年龄、性别和尿白细胞计数是最重要的三个预测特征。我们的研究有可能帮助临床医生识别高危患者,对抗生素处方做出明智的决定,并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine learning for the prediction of urosepsis using electronic health record data.

Machine learning for the prediction of urosepsis using electronic health record data.

Machine learning for the prediction of urosepsis using electronic health record data.

Machine learning for the prediction of urosepsis using electronic health record data.

Urosepsis, a medical condition resulting from the progression of urinary tract infection (UTI), is a leading cause of death in the US. Urosepsis occurs due to complicated UTI and constitutes ~25% of sepsis cases. Early prediction of urosepsis is critical in providing personalized care, reducing diagnostic uncertainty, lowering mortality rates. While machine learning (ML) techniques have the potential to aid healthcare professionals in identifying risk factors and recommending treatment options, no study has been developed to predict the development of urosepsis in patients with a suspected UTI in outpatient settings. We develop and evaluate ML models in predicting hospital admission and urosepsis diagnosis for patients with an outpatient UTI encounter, leveraging de-identified electronic health records sourced from UCLA. Inclusion criteria included a positive diagnosis of urinary tract infection indicated by ICD-10 code N30/N93.0 and positive bacteria result via urinalysis in an ambulatory setting. W extracted demographic information, urinalysis findings, and antibiotics prescribed for each instance of UTI. Reencounters we defined as encounters within seven days of the initial UTI. Reencounters were considered urosepsis-related if matching positive blood and urine cultures were found with a sepsis ICD-10 code of A41/R78/R65. ML models were trained and evaluated on two tasks: prediction of a reencounter leading to hospitalization, prediction of Urosepsis. Model performances were stratified by ethnicities. Random forest models achieved significant improvement over baseline performance (APR = 0.004), with APR = 0.15 for reencounters and 0.31 for urosepsis prediction. While these APR values reflect the challenge of predicting rare events (0.4% prevalence), they represent meaningful predictive power for clinical risk stratification. We computed Shapley values to interpret model predictions and found patient age, sex, and urinary WBC-count were the top three predictive features. Our study has the potential to assist clinicians in the identification of high-risk patients, informed decisions about antibiotic prescription and improving patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信