综合初级保健参与的障碍和促进因素:护理团队成员和护理人员的趋同和不同观点。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Chimereodo Okoroji, Lindsay Poole, Jesslyn Jamison, Donna Armentrout, Angela Pereyra Monero, Jennifer A Mautone, Ariel A Williamson
{"title":"综合初级保健参与的障碍和促进因素:护理团队成员和护理人员的趋同和不同观点。","authors":"Chimereodo Okoroji, Lindsay Poole, Jesslyn Jamison, Donna Armentrout, Angela Pereyra Monero, Jennifer A Mautone, Ariel A Williamson","doi":"10.1037/fsh0001003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated primary care (IPC) can improve access to behavioral health (BH) care, reduce stigma, and facilitate early intervention. However, few studies have examined key informants' perceptions of IPC engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We qualitatively identified convergent and divergent perspectives of care team members and caregivers on pediatric IPC-related engagement barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvements.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Care team members (<i>N</i> = 48, 98.3% female, 72.9% non-Hispanic/Latine White) and caregivers (<i>N</i> = 10, 100% female, 10.0%. Asian, 30.0% Black/African American, 60.0% non-Hispanic/Latine White) completed semistructured interviews on IPC engagement in a large pediatric primary care network. Thematic analysis was used to iteratively identify patterns of meaning, as well as convergent and divergent themes across informant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Convergent barriers included stigma, prolonged wait times, limited BH knowledge, difficulty navigating services, and limited BH provider availability. Whereas care team members identified more family-related barriers (e.g., beliefs, experiences), caregivers identified divergent barriers such as limited childcare. Perceived engagement facilitators converged across groups and mostly pertained to systems-related factors such as the colocation of services. Converging recommendations included additional behavioral clinicians and support staff, provision of psychoeducational resources, and expanding IPC services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although key informant groups similarly perceived many IPC benefits, including increased BH access, there are continued patient/family barriers to IPC engagement, with divergence in care team members' versus caregivers' views about the nature of these barriers. Findings suggest a need for systems-level changes to address these barriers and highlight the importance of including the unique perspectives of care team members and caregivers in future research examining IPC effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to and facilitators of integrated primary care engagement: Convergent and divergent perspectives of care team members and caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Chimereodo Okoroji, Lindsay Poole, Jesslyn Jamison, Donna Armentrout, Angela Pereyra Monero, Jennifer A Mautone, Ariel A Williamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0001003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated primary care (IPC) can improve access to behavioral health (BH) care, reduce stigma, and facilitate early intervention. However, few studies have examined key informants' perceptions of IPC engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We qualitatively identified convergent and divergent perspectives of care team members and caregivers on pediatric IPC-related engagement barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvements.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Care team members (<i>N</i> = 48, 98.3% female, 72.9% non-Hispanic/Latine White) and caregivers (<i>N</i> = 10, 100% female, 10.0%. Asian, 30.0% Black/African American, 60.0% non-Hispanic/Latine White) completed semistructured interviews on IPC engagement in a large pediatric primary care network. Thematic analysis was used to iteratively identify patterns of meaning, as well as convergent and divergent themes across informant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Convergent barriers included stigma, prolonged wait times, limited BH knowledge, difficulty navigating services, and limited BH provider availability. Whereas care team members identified more family-related barriers (e.g., beliefs, experiences), caregivers identified divergent barriers such as limited childcare. Perceived engagement facilitators converged across groups and mostly pertained to systems-related factors such as the colocation of services. Converging recommendations included additional behavioral clinicians and support staff, provision of psychoeducational resources, and expanding IPC services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although key informant groups similarly perceived many IPC benefits, including increased BH access, there are continued patient/family barriers to IPC engagement, with divergence in care team members' versus caregivers' views about the nature of these barriers. Findings suggest a need for systems-level changes to address these barriers and highlight the importance of including the unique perspectives of care team members and caregivers in future research examining IPC effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0001003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0001003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:综合初级保健(IPC)可以改善获得行为卫生(BH)保健的机会,减少耻辱感,并促进早期干预。然而,很少有研究调查了关键信息提供者对IPC参与的看法。目的:我们定性地确定了护理团队成员和护理人员对儿科ipc相关参与障碍、促进因素和改进建议的趋同和分歧观点。方法:护理团队成员(N = 48,女性98.3%,非西班牙裔/拉丁裔白人72.9%)和护理人员(N = 10,女性100%,10.0%)。亚洲人(30.0%黑人/非裔美国人,60.0%非西班牙裔/拉丁裔白人)完成了关于IPC参与大型儿科初级保健网络的半结构化访谈。主题分析用于反复识别意义模式,以及跨信息群体的趋同和不同主题。结果:会聚障碍包括耻辱、延长等待时间、有限的BH知识、难以导航服务和有限的BH提供者可用性。虽然护理团队成员确定了更多与家庭有关的障碍(例如,信仰,经历),但护理人员确定了不同的障碍,例如有限的托儿服务。感知到的参与促进因素跨群体融合,主要涉及系统相关因素,如服务的托管。一致的建议包括增加行为临床医生和支持人员、提供心理教育资源和扩大IPC服务。结论:尽管关键信息者群体同样认为IPC有许多好处,包括增加了进入BH的机会,但患者/家庭参与IPC的障碍仍然存在,护理团队成员和护理人员对这些障碍的性质的看法存在分歧。研究结果表明,需要进行系统层面的改革,以解决这些障碍,并强调在未来研究IPC有效性时,包括护理团队成员和护理人员的独特观点的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to and facilitators of integrated primary care engagement: Convergent and divergent perspectives of care team members and caregivers.

Background: Integrated primary care (IPC) can improve access to behavioral health (BH) care, reduce stigma, and facilitate early intervention. However, few studies have examined key informants' perceptions of IPC engagement.

Objective: We qualitatively identified convergent and divergent perspectives of care team members and caregivers on pediatric IPC-related engagement barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvements.

Method: Care team members (N = 48, 98.3% female, 72.9% non-Hispanic/Latine White) and caregivers (N = 10, 100% female, 10.0%. Asian, 30.0% Black/African American, 60.0% non-Hispanic/Latine White) completed semistructured interviews on IPC engagement in a large pediatric primary care network. Thematic analysis was used to iteratively identify patterns of meaning, as well as convergent and divergent themes across informant groups.

Results: Convergent barriers included stigma, prolonged wait times, limited BH knowledge, difficulty navigating services, and limited BH provider availability. Whereas care team members identified more family-related barriers (e.g., beliefs, experiences), caregivers identified divergent barriers such as limited childcare. Perceived engagement facilitators converged across groups and mostly pertained to systems-related factors such as the colocation of services. Converging recommendations included additional behavioral clinicians and support staff, provision of psychoeducational resources, and expanding IPC services.

Conclusion: Although key informant groups similarly perceived many IPC benefits, including increased BH access, there are continued patient/family barriers to IPC engagement, with divergence in care team members' versus caregivers' views about the nature of these barriers. Findings suggest a need for systems-level changes to address these barriers and highlight the importance of including the unique perspectives of care team members and caregivers in future research examining IPC effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信