临床-实验-临床教学模式在牙科专科人才培养中的应用。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dan Wu, Qinghua Zheng, Bingbing Sun, Xian Liu, Jing Yang
{"title":"临床-实验-临床教学模式在牙科专科人才培养中的应用。","authors":"Dan Wu, Qinghua Zheng, Bingbing Sun, Xian Liu, Jing Yang","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dental education faces challenges in terms of integrating theory and practice. This study aimed to integrate online virtual simulation, three-dimensional (3D)-printed models, and hands-on training to develop a clinical-experimental-clinical (CEC) teaching model based on third-molar pericoronitis and tooth extraction and to evaluate its application in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) specialist training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 67 OMFS students and 22 surgeons from the West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University. Patients with third-molar pericoronitis were selected, and their cases were integrated into an online virtual simulation platform for students to practice tooth extraction procedures. Additionally, a 3D-printed model was used for offline training. The effectiveness of CEC was assessed through postoperative reviews and a questionnaire survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 80% of students considered CEC well-designed, and almost 90% were satisfied with its consistency with theoretical courses. A majority (80.6%) believed it improved clinical skills, and 86.57% agreed it enhanced theoretical understanding. Over 80% supported its expansion to other dental courses. Compared to traditional teaching, 83.58% found CEC facilitated repeated learning. Most teachers agreed it improved students' theoretical knowledge (95.45%), clinical skills (90.9%), and confidence (86.37%). While 50% found it easy to implement, 31.82% felt it required technical support. Despite some challenges, 77.25% of teachers preferred the CEC model over traditional methods and supported its broader application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CEC teaching model effectively enhanced OMFS students' practical skills and clinical competence, demonstrating its potential for broader application in specialist training in dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":"e13991"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Clinical-Experimental-Clinical Teaching Model for Specialist Training in Dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Wu, Qinghua Zheng, Bingbing Sun, Xian Liu, Jing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dental education faces challenges in terms of integrating theory and practice. This study aimed to integrate online virtual simulation, three-dimensional (3D)-printed models, and hands-on training to develop a clinical-experimental-clinical (CEC) teaching model based on third-molar pericoronitis and tooth extraction and to evaluate its application in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) specialist training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 67 OMFS students and 22 surgeons from the West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University. Patients with third-molar pericoronitis were selected, and their cases were integrated into an online virtual simulation platform for students to practice tooth extraction procedures. Additionally, a 3D-printed model was used for offline training. The effectiveness of CEC was assessed through postoperative reviews and a questionnaire survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 80% of students considered CEC well-designed, and almost 90% were satisfied with its consistency with theoretical courses. A majority (80.6%) believed it improved clinical skills, and 86.57% agreed it enhanced theoretical understanding. Over 80% supported its expansion to other dental courses. Compared to traditional teaching, 83.58% found CEC facilitated repeated learning. Most teachers agreed it improved students' theoretical knowledge (95.45%), clinical skills (90.9%), and confidence (86.37%). While 50% found it easy to implement, 31.82% felt it required technical support. Despite some challenges, 77.25% of teachers preferred the CEC model over traditional methods and supported its broader application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CEC teaching model effectively enhanced OMFS students' practical skills and clinical competence, demonstrating its potential for broader application in specialist training in dentistry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:口腔教育面临着理论与实践相结合的挑战。本研究旨在将在线虚拟仿真、三维打印模型和实践训练相结合,建立基于第三磨牙冠周炎和拔牙的临床-实验-临床(CEC)教学模式,并评估其在口腔颌面外科(OMFS)专科培训中的应用。方法:本研究招募了来自四川大学华西口腔医学院的67名OMFS学生和22名外科医生。选择患有第三磨牙冠周炎的患者,并将其病例整合到在线虚拟模拟平台中,供学生练习拔牙程序。此外,还使用3d打印模型进行线下培训。通过术后回顾和问卷调查评估CEC的有效性。结果:近80%的学生认为CEC设计良好,近90%的学生对其与理论课程的一致性感到满意。大多数人(80.6%)认为它提高了临床技能,86.57%的人认为它提高了理论认识。超过八成支持将课程扩展至其他牙科课程。与传统教学相比,83.58%的学生认为CEC有利于重复学习。大多数教师认为提高了学生的理论知识(95.45%)、临床技能(90.9%)和信心(86.37%)。50%的人认为它很容易实现,31.82%的人认为它需要技术支持。尽管存在一些挑战,77.25%的教师更喜欢CEC模式,并支持其更广泛的应用。结论:CEC教学模式有效提高了OMFS学生的实践技能和临床能力,在牙科专科培训中具有广阔的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Clinical-Experimental-Clinical Teaching Model for Specialist Training in Dentistry.

Objectives: Dental education faces challenges in terms of integrating theory and practice. This study aimed to integrate online virtual simulation, three-dimensional (3D)-printed models, and hands-on training to develop a clinical-experimental-clinical (CEC) teaching model based on third-molar pericoronitis and tooth extraction and to evaluate its application in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) specialist training.

Methods: The study enrolled 67 OMFS students and 22 surgeons from the West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University. Patients with third-molar pericoronitis were selected, and their cases were integrated into an online virtual simulation platform for students to practice tooth extraction procedures. Additionally, a 3D-printed model was used for offline training. The effectiveness of CEC was assessed through postoperative reviews and a questionnaire survey.

Results: Nearly 80% of students considered CEC well-designed, and almost 90% were satisfied with its consistency with theoretical courses. A majority (80.6%) believed it improved clinical skills, and 86.57% agreed it enhanced theoretical understanding. Over 80% supported its expansion to other dental courses. Compared to traditional teaching, 83.58% found CEC facilitated repeated learning. Most teachers agreed it improved students' theoretical knowledge (95.45%), clinical skills (90.9%), and confidence (86.37%). While 50% found it easy to implement, 31.82% felt it required technical support. Despite some challenges, 77.25% of teachers preferred the CEC model over traditional methods and supported its broader application.

Conclusions: The CEC teaching model effectively enhanced OMFS students' practical skills and clinical competence, demonstrating its potential for broader application in specialist training in dentistry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信